What If Dewey Had Defeated Truman in 1948?

Author Tony Dunnell
August 22, 2025

Love it?

On the evening of November 2, 1948, America’s newsrooms confidently prepared for what seemed inevitable: Thomas E. Dewey’s victory over Harry S. Truman in the U.S. presidential election. Radio commentators and pollsters had spent weeks predicting the Republican governor’s triumph. The media’s certainty was so complete that some newspapers even went to press before final results were tallied, and on November 3, the Chicago Daily Tribune famously ran with the headline “DEWEY DEFEATS TRUMAN.” Yet, in one of the greatest upsets in American political history, Truman defied the odds, winning 303 electoral votes to Dewey’s 189. 

The photograph of a grinning Truman holding up the erroneous Tribune headline became an iconic symbol of journalistic overconfidence. But what if the media had been right? How might things be different if Dewey had actually won the presidency in 1948?

Credit: Keystone/ Hulton Archive via Getty Images

A Difference of Style

With Truman’s victory, the Democrats retained the White House and took control of the Senate and the House of Representatives. But if the pollsters had been correct and the Republican candidate had won, the most obvious and immediate difference in the White House may have been one of character.   

In an interview with History Facts, historian A.J. Baime — author of The Accidental President: Harry S. Truman and the Four Months That Changed the World — pointed out how a Dewey presidency would have brought a fundamentally different personality to the White House. According to Baime, Truman was a comparatively down-to-earth, plain-speaking individual who drank bourbon, loved poker, and represented “the greatest manifestation of the common American man.” Dewey, on the other hand, had a stiffer demeanor and came across as more distant in public — a man, Baime said, who “drank gin and spoke in platitudes, in a deep baritone trained singing voice.” 

Dewey played bridge and used his sharp, analytical mind to ponder issues of wider society rather than connect with the individual voter. While he was admired by many for his intelligence and integrity, he did not have Truman’s warmth — and this obvious difference of style, Baime said, “meant something to the American people and still means something to the American people.” It’s hard to say how these personality differences may have altered U.S. history, though. Dewey’s potentially more measured, deliberate approach to communication might have provided steadier leadership during times of crisis, but he may have lacked the populist appeal of Truman that resonated with ordinary Americans.

Why Was the Battle of the Alamo Important?

Author Paul Chang
August 12, 2025

Love it?

In February 1836, an outnumbered band of Texan independence fighters faced a Mexican army in what would become one of the most storied conflicts in American history: the Battle of the Alamo. Although they lost the battle, the Texan fighters’ final stand became a historic symbol of resistance and freedom, immortalized in the famous battle cry, “Remember the Alamo!” Here’s a look back at why this fascinating battle was important — militarily, politically, and symbolically.

Credit: Chronicle/ Alamy Stock Photo 

Rising Tensions in Texas

After winning independence from Spain in 1821, Mexico allowed pioneers from the expanding United States to settle in the northern Tejas region of Mexico that eventually became the state of Texas. Over the next decade, these “Texians,” as they were known at the time, enjoyed a relative degree of autonomy far from Mexico’s capital. 

However, as the number of settlers grew, the Mexican government responded by prohibiting U.S. immigration and imposing tariffs on the Texas settlers, causing tensions to escalate. This eventually boiled over into armed clashes between the settlers and the Mexican government with the Battle of Velasco in 1832 — a prelude to the brewing Texas Revolution.

Against this backdrop, the Texas settlers believed that Antonio López de Santa Anna — a celebrated general vying for the Mexican presidency — backed their continued autonomy due to his Federalist campaign platform, which supported a division between federal and local governance. However, upon winning the presidency in 1833, Santa Anna did an about-face and abolished the Mexican Constitution of 1824, which had enshrined the Federalist system, seeking to centralize power as a military dictator. This was the straw that broke the camel’s back: On October 2, 1835, tensions reached a breaking point and the Texas Revolution began in earnest with the Battle of Gonzales. The revolutionaries won their first fight, but the quest for independence was just beginning — and the stage for the Battle of the Alamo was set.

Who Was John Hancock?

Author Timothy Ott
August 12, 2025

Love it?

The apparent one-hit wonder of the U.S. Founding Fathers, John Hancock is largely known today solely for inscribing the first and largest signature at the bottom the Declaration of Independence — an act that resulted in his name becoming a synonym for the legally identifying scribbles we apply to checks and other important forms today.

It may seem curious that Hancock’s name stands front and center among the signatures on this most cherished document of American history, ahead of far more famous founders such as Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, or Benjamin Franklin. Yet Hancock was very much a leading man of his time. His reputation rendered him worthy of the handwritten flourish that placed him first among the luminaries who called for independence on July 4, 1776, even if his memory has all but vanished beyond the contours of that famous signature.

Credit: MPI/ Archive Photos via Getty Images 

Rise to Wealth and Prominence

As described in Brooke Barbier’s biography King Hancock, John Hancock was born on January 23, 1737, in Braintree, Massachusetts, the son and grandson of Harvard College-groomed ministers (also both named John). Hancock likely would have headed down a similar career path, but his life took a sharp turn after his father died in 1744, and he was sent to live with his wealthy uncle, Thomas, in the large port city of Boston.

A largely mediocre student — although he proved adept at penmanship — Hancock went to work for his uncle’s import-export business after graduating from Harvard in 1754. He became a partner after a stint overseas in London in the early 1760s, and then inherited the firm following Thomas’ death in 1764. As befitting a man who then ranked among the wealthiest in Boston, Hancock was named a city selectman in 1765, before earning election to the Massachusetts House of Representatives the following year.

His rising social and political clout came at a time of increasing tensions toward the British Parliament, with many Bostonians frustrated by the taxes imposed by the Sugar Act of 1764 and the Stamp Act of 1765. A merchant with strong business ties to London, Hancock did not share the rebellious viewpoints harbored by local firebrands such as Samuel Adams and James Otis. Nevertheless, he joined a network of merchants who agreed to stop importing British goods as long as the Stamp Act remained in effect, an endeavor that proved successful with the act’s repeal in 1766.

Hancock’s shift toward resistance leader continued following a new round of import duties with the passage of the Townshend Acts in 1767. Drawing suspicions of smuggling from the local customs board, Hancock was celebrated for ejecting a pair of prying customs officials from one of the ships. Another of his vessels was seized two months later, and he was arrested in the fall of 1768 for smuggling, before getting the charges dropped the following spring with the help of lawyer and childhood friend John Adams.

Meanwhile, Hancock was among the group of assemblymen who helped draft the widely distributed “Circular Letter” that argued against the Townshend Acts, and he was also among the majority that voted to reject British demands to retract the letter. Two years later, following the violence of the Boston Massacre on March 5, 1770, Hancock chaired a committee that demanded the removal of British soldiers from Boston, and he agreed to oversee their safe and orderly withdrawal via the harbor.

Does the Thumbs-Up Sign Come From Gladiator Fights? 

Author Tony Dunnell
August 5, 2025

Love it?

The thumbs-up sign is one of the most instantly and universally recognized symbols of approval in modern Western culture. This ubiquitous gesture appears in everyday acknowledgments between friends and colleagues, in emojis across social media, and in numerous TV shows and movies, with famous fictional proponents including “The Fonz,” Borat, and Arnold Schwarzenegger’s T-800 in Terminator 2: Judgment Day.

Despite this popularity, a fair amount of confusion and misinformation surrounds the origin of the thumbs-up sign. Most notably, many people believe the gesture has its origins in ancient Roman gladiator fights, where spectators supposedly used a thumbs-up to spare defeated fighters and a thumbs-down to condemn them to death. This narrative has been reinforced by popular culture — particularly the 2000 Academy Award-winning movie Gladiator. The historical reality, however, is not nearly as clear cut as Hollywood would have us believe. 

Credit: Bettmann via Getty Images 

The Problem With Pollice Verso

It’s true that there’s a link between thumb gestures and gladiator fights in ancient Rome, but we don’t know exactly how the gesture was used. At the heart of the historical debate is the Latin phrase pollice verso, meaning “with a turned thumb.” This phrase appears in ancient Roman literature, including in connection with gladiatorial contests, but its exact meaning remains unclear to historians. We don’t know whether pollice verso referred to a thumb being turned up, turned down, held horizontally, or concealed inside the hand to indicate positive or negative opinions — or, in the arena, to signal whether a gladiator was spared or killed. 

The ambiguity of ancient sources has allowed later interpreters to project their own meaning onto the gesture. The most significant example of this in the modern era is Jean-Léon Gérôme’s 1872 painting “Pollice Verso.” The painting brilliantly captures the power and drama of a gladiatorial contest, with one gladiator standing above his fallen opponent, who, lying stricken on the ground, raises two fingers to plead for mercy. In the stands of the Colosseum, Roman spectators, including an animated group of vestal virgins, signal death for the defeated gladiator with a thumbs-down gesture. The painting greatly popularized the idea that a thumbs-up signaled life, and a thumbs-down signaled death for a defeated gladiator.

It didn’t take long, however, for scholars to highlight the painting’s lack of a solid historical foundation in its portrayal of the gladiatorial contest. In 1879, a 26-page pamphlet titled Pollice Verso: To the Lovers of Truth in Classic Art, This Is Most Respectfully Addressed presented evidence against the historical accuracy of the thumb gestures in Gérôme’s painting.

What Was the Antebellum Period?

Author Nicole Villeneuve
July 30, 2025

Love it?

In the years before the Civil War, the United States was rapidly expanding geographically, economically, and politically. This era, roughly spanning from the end of the War of 1812 (which lasted until 1815) to the start of the Civil War in 1861, is often called the “antebellum” era, after the Latin term for “before the war.” 

The term “antebellum” is also used more specifically in reference to the American South during this time, describing an idealized vision of plantation life and grand, columned estates that has been popularized by films such as Gone With the Wind. But the term has long been controversial, seen as a romanticization of a society built on slavery and racial oppression. In 2020, country band Lady Antebellum said that a newfound perspective on the “injustices, inequality, and biases Black women and men have always faced and continue to face everyday” prompted them to change their name to Lady A. 

More broadly, the term refers to any period preceding a war, but it’s most often used in reference to the decades leading up to the U.S. Civil War. During this time period, the tension between reform and resistance reached a tipping point, setting the stage for the one of the largest conflicts in American history.

Credit: Bettmann via Getty Images 

A Nation Divided

One of the key issues leading up to the Civil War was whether slavery should be allowed to continue in the United States, and if so, where. While the Northern states were slowly moving toward abolition, the South’s economy was deeply tied to enslaved labor. Cotton production was booming, and it depended on the forced labor of millions of Black Americans.

Over the course of the 19th century, Congress passed a series of compromises to try to navigate these growing divisions. In 1820, the Missouri Compromise admitted Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free one in order to maintain the balance. The Compromise of 1850 let California join as a free state but included a harsh law requiring the return of people who escaped slavery. And in 1854, the Kansas-Nebraska Act allowed residents in those territories to decide the issue for themselves. 

These were ultimately attempts to maintain a delicate political balance and avoid Southern threats of secession, which were fueled by fears that the federal government would override state decisions. But they merely delayed conflict, and in some cases, these compromises actually highlighted how unstable the political climate had become: In the 1850s, a period of violent clashes known as Bleeding Kansas erupted between the opposing sides. 

5 of the Most Famous Dresses in History

Author Tony Dunnell
July 23, 2025

Love it?

Rose Bertin, an 18th-century French dressmaker often referred to as the world’s first fashion designer, once told her most famous client, Queen Marie Antoinette, “There is nothing new except what has been forgotten.” 

Some gowns, however, steadfastly defy the passage of time and refuse to be forgotten. They are destined to remain fresh in the public consciousness, no matter how many years pass or how many trends come and go. Such dresses have transcended mere fashion to become enduring symbols of power or romance, tragedy or transformation, capturing moments in history in finely crafted fabric and thread. 

Here’s a look at five iconic gowns from history, from the elaborate wardrobes of prerevolutionary France to the heights of Hollywood royalty. 

Credit: The Picture Art Collection/ Alamy Stock Photo

Marie Antoinette’s Court Dresses

Marie Antoinette was the epitome of excess in prerevolutionary France. Her name became synonymous with profligacy, promiscuity, and the decline of moral authority within the French monarchy, and her legendary quote, “Let them eat cake,” is widely known even today — despite there being no evidence that she ever uttered the words. 

The French queen’s reputation for frivolity was only heightened by her magnificent court gowns. There was no holding back when it came to her dresses, which were often constructed using panniers — hoop skirts that added volume around the hips — giving her gowns impressively impractical width. Combined with luxurious silk garments, large box pleats, bodices, ribbons, bows, frills, and jewelry, the finished look was nothing short of glorious — and, for the increasingly irate revolutionaries, entirely inappropriate. Today we can still admire the splendor of Antoinette’s court dresses in various contemporary portraits, perhaps none more iconic than “Marie Antoinette in Court Dress” by French painter Elisabeth Louise Vigée Le Brun. 

Who Founded Each of the 13 Original Colonies?

Author Tony Dunnell
July 22, 2025

Love it?

At the start of the 17th century, three colonial powers — France, Spain, and England — were competing for dominion in North America. Despite arriving later than their rivals, it was the British who finally took control. Within a century and a half, they had created 13 flourishing colonies on the Atlantic coast — the same 13 colonies that eventually broke away from British rule during the American Revolutionary War. 

Each of these colonies was established for distinct reasons, reflecting the religious beliefs, economic interests, or social ethics of their founders. Here’s a look at who founded each of America’s original 13 colonies.

Credit: MPI/ Archive Photos via Getty Images 

Virginia 

Virginia was founded by the Virginia Company of London, which was chartered by Britain’s King James I. The company set sail from England with three ships in 1606 and arrived the following year with 104 people. On May 13, 1607, the company established Jamestown — named after the king — as its first settlement, which became the first permanent English settlement in North America.

Credit: Design Pics Editorial/ Universal Images Group via Getty Images 

Massachusetts

Two key events led to Massachusetts’ foundation. The first was the creation of Plymouth Colony, established in 1620 by the Pilgrims, a group of 100 or so people who set sail from England on the Mayflower in search of religious freedom. A decade later, the larger Massachusetts Bay Colony was founded by the Massachusetts Bay Company, which had obtained a charter from King Charles I. Later, in 1691, Plymouth Colony was merged into Massachusetts Bay.

Our 50 Funniest Facts About History

Author Bennett Kleinman
July 15, 2025

Love it?

For all of the somber and mundane events that have occurred throughout human history, others are absurd enough to make you laugh out loud. This includes amusing tales such as one of history’s greatest generals getting attacked by rabbits, bizarre phobias and famous fallouts, and the strange bathroom habits of one U.S. president. So, if you’re looking to broaden your knowledge and have a good chuckle in the process, read on for 50 of the funniest facts we’ve featured on History Facts.

Credit: Nastasic/ DigitalVision Vectors via Getty Images 

1. Napoleon was attacked (and defeated) by a horde of rabbits.

In one of history’s most shocking upsets, the emperor of the French was attacked by a horde of fluffy bunnies. The coup took place in July 1807 as Napoleon and his coterie celebrated a victory with a traditional rabbit hunt. Rather than run away, however, the bunnies began swarming Napoleon and his men. Though amusing at first, the situation quickly overwhelmed some of Europe’s foremost military strategists.

2. Andrew Jackson’s parrot was kicked out of his funeral for swearing.

It’s odd enough that President Andrew Jackson had an African grey parrot named Poll, and stranger still that the bird was kicked out of Jackson’s funeral for foul language. As one attendee observed, “Before the sermon and while the crowd was gathering, a wicked parrot that was a household pet got excited and commenced swearing so loud and long as to disturb the people and had to be carried from the house.”

What Were TV Test Cards For?

Author Kristina Wright
July 15, 2025

Love it?

If you grew up in the U.S. before 24-hour television programming, you might remember falling asleep to the sound of the national anthem or waking up to the eerie tone of a test pattern. Local stations typically signed off late at night — often with patriotic imagery and music — before going dark or switching to a test card. Early risers or insomniacs who turned on the TV were thus greeted by screens filled with color bars or geometric patterns accompanied by a high-pitched tone, holding the airwaves until regular programming resumed at dawn.

These static images, known as test cards or test patterns, weren’t just placeholders. They were created as calibration tools for engineers — and unintentionally became enduring symbols of a bygone broadcast era. Here’s a look back at TV before 24/7 programming changed the way we watched the tube.

Credit: Bettmann via Getty Images 

Programming Didn’t Always Run All Night

In the early decades of American television, viewers typically had access to only three to five local stations, and programming didn’t operate around the clock. In 1950, four networks — ABC, CBS, DuMont (which folded in 1955), and NBC — were producing just 90 hours of programming a week combined. Within a decade, the three remaining networks were producing about that much programming individually — about 12 to 13 hours per day.

Rather than broadcast dead air outside of programming hours, many stations displayed test cards. These images helped technicians adjust transmission quality and allowed viewers to fine-tune their analog sets. In the age of “rabbit ears” and vertical hold, achieving clear reception took a little finessing at home. Test cards served as visual guideposts, helping viewers align antennas and tweak picture settings to reduce flicker, ghosting, or image roll.

Was Homer a Real Person?

Author Bess Lovejoy
July 9, 2025

Love it?

For centuries, people have pondered one of the most enduring mysteries in literature: Was Homer, the legendary author of the Iliad and the Odyssey, a real person? Or is “Homer” simply the name we’ve given to a sprawling oral tradition, shaped and reshaped over time? The short answer is: No one knows for certain. But the long answer — rooted in a rich blend of linguistic clues, ancient traditions, and the remarkable staying power of two epic poems — is far more interesting. Here’s a look at the fascinating history and enduring legacy of Homer.

Credit: history_docu_photo/ Alamy Stock Photo

The Singular Homer

If Homer was indeed a real person, he likely lived around the eighth or ninth century BCE, possibly in Ionia, a region on the western coast of modern-day Turkey. Many ancient writers depicted him as a blind bard — much like the character Demodocus in the Odyssey — and tradition often claimed he was illiterate and his epic poems were passed down orally. His name first appears in the written record in the seventh century BCE, and several Greek cities, especially those in Ionia, claimed him as a native son.

There is no surviving contemporary biography, but ancient Greeks believed someone named Homer composed — or at least shaped — the Iliad and the Odyssey. These epics, delivered orally in a highly stylized and formulaic language, show what could be signs of a single organizing mind. Repetitive phrases like “rosy-fingered dawn” and “swift-footed Achilles” suggest a poet well versed in the techniques of oral storytelling, using set expressions to maintain rhythm and fluency in performance. 

Still, not everyone has been convinced that one poet alone could have composed both the Iliad and the Odyssey. Even in antiquity, scholars noted that the two poems differ in style and subject: One is martial and tragic, the other picaresque and magical. Aristotle famously proposed that the Odyssey was the work of Homer’s old age. Others have suggested that the poems were built up over time by many voices, with Homer serving as the principal architect — or perhaps just the most famous name attached.