Why Are U.S. Presidents Called ‘Commanders in Chief’? 

Author Tony Dunnell
July 9, 2025

Love it?

One of the U.S. president’s most significant roles is serving as commander in chief, the top authority over all branches of the United States military. But where does this title come from, and what exactly does it entail? 

Credit: Douglas Sacha/ Moment via Getty Images 

Constitutional Origins 

The Founding Fathers used the term “commander in chief” when drafting Article II, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution. It states: “The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States.” In other words, as well as being the supreme governor of the affairs of the country, the president is also given ultimate control over the nation’s armed forces. 

This wasn’t a new concept when the founders included it. Historical precedents for the role go back at least as far as the kings and emperors of ancient Rome, who held imperium, meaning supreme executive power in the Roman state, including both military and judicial authority. 

The title itself predates the Constitution by decades. It was introduced in England by King Charles I in 1639, and the current king, Charles III, is still known as commander in chief. The title was also used in British military tradition to describe the highest-ranking military officer in a particular theater or region. The British general William Howe, for example, was given the rank of commander in chief during the American Revolutionary War. 

What’s the Difference Between a President and a Prime Minister?

Author Nicole Villeneuve
June 30, 2025

Love it?

Governments have played a crucial role in human history for thousands of years. Their structure has evolved significantly over time, and while modern political systems vary, many countries now are led by either a president or a prime minister. Though the core roles of these high-ranking officials are fundamentally similar, there are several distinctions between the two positions, including the types of governments they represent, how they are elected, how long they keep their title, and their specific powers.

Credit: Bettmann via Getty Images

Head of State vs. Head of Government

A president is almost always the head of state as well as the head of government — not only do they participate in policymaking, but they also may oversee the military and represent the nation diplomatically. A prime minister, meanwhile, is typically the head of government, and while they’re often the most recognizable figurehead of a country, a separate individual serves as the head of state.  

In a parliamentary system, the prime minister works closely with the legislative body, Parliament, and must maintain its confidence to stay in power. In constitutional monarchies, such as Canada, the U.K., and Japan, the PM leads Parliament while the head of state may be a king, queen, or emperor. Other countries have both a president and a prime minister. For instance, in parliamentary republics such as Finland and India, a president serves as the head of state and a prime minister governs. A semi-presidential system, such as in France, also has both a president and a prime minister, but the president typically holds significant power. 

In countries where the president is also the head of government, such as the U.S., the role includes several executive duties: enacting and enforcing the laws created by Congress, negotiating treaties, appointing Cabinet members and judges, and deploying military forces. A prime minister, meanwhile, also leads their country’s government, overseeing the federal agenda, directing policy development and decisions, and choosing Cabinet members who will carry out the work. Even though a PM is not an official head of state, they often undertake diplomatic functions as a prominent representative of the country.

5 of the Most Famous Telegrams in History

Author Timothy Ott
June 30, 2025

Love it?

Although it still exists, the telegraph has been all but forgotten in a world dominated by instant digital messaging, relegated to the archives of 20th-century institutions alongside the corner phone booth and the horse and buggy. Yet there was a time when this form of communication was the best and most efficient way to deliver a message across significant distances. Western Union, the largest provider of the service, logged more than 200 million telegrams sent in its peak year of 1929.

Given the telegraph’s popularity, it’s not surprising that numerous important messages from the past two centuries traveled by way of telegram, some of which inspired notable changes to global events while others provided appropriate commentary to historic moments as they unfurled. Here are five such transmissions that have proved to possess staying power even as the technology that provided them has largely been pushed aside.

Credit: Bettmann via Getty Images 

Samuel Morse’s Test Message From the U.S. Capitol

On May 24, 1844, some 12 years after he set about devising a way to transmit information by way of an electrical current, Samuel F.B. Morse prepared to showcase his perfected invention before an influential audience in the U.S. Capitol. Morse transmitted the words “What hath God wrought” — a message inspired by the Bible, suggested by the patent commissioner’s daughter — over a copper wire that followed the B&O Railroad line nearly 40 miles to a Baltimore station. There, his assistant Alfred Vail received the message and replied with the same phrase from a second machine. 

This wasn’t the first example of a working telegraph. Inventors William F. Cooke and Charles Wheatstone had unveiled their version in the United Kingdom in 1837, and Morse and his team had previously conducted demonstrations across shorter distances. However, this particular showing, colored by a message hinting at divine intervention, has endured as the impetus for the rapid spread of this novel communication system over the following decade.

What Did Gas Cost in the 1950s?

Author Mark DeJoy
June 30, 2025

Love it?

The 1950s were a transformative decade for transportation in the United States. Factors such as postwar prosperity, suburban living, and a decline in public transit led to a major increase in car ownership. At the start of the decade, approximately half of Americans owned an automobile; by 1960, nearly 75% of Americans owned at least one car, and many owned two. It was the golden age of the automobile.

Of course, a car can’t go anywhere without gasoline, so what did this trend mean for the price of gas? When we look back at the past, we tend to see lower prices and feel a sense of nostalgia for more affordable times. But vintage prices can be tricky; simply looking at a raw retail price from 70 years ago doesn’t tell the whole story. Let’s look at the numbers when adjusted for inflation to find the average cost of gas throughout the 1950s.

Credit: George Marks/ Hulton Archive via Getty Images

1950-1952

According to the U.S. Department of Energy, the national average for the cost of gasoline remained steady for the first three years of the 1950s at $0.27 per gallon. That low price might sound practically idyllic, but the average household income at the time was $3,300 per year. Adjusted for inflation, $0.27 in 1950 equates to about $3.52/gallon in today’s dollars. Nowadays, the median household income is $74,580

Why Do We Call Them ‘Ivy League’ Schools?

Author Kristina Wright
June 30, 2025

Love it?

“Ivy League” is a term that evokes images of the hallowed vine-covered walls of some of the most elite educational institutions in the world. The Northeastern United States is home to the eight private research colleges and universities that make up the  Ivy League, including Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island; Columbia University in New York City; Cornell University in Ithaca, New York; Dartmouth College in Hanover, New Hampshire; Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts; University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Princeton University in Princeton, New Jersey; and Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut. 

Of this group of exclusive schools, all but Cornell University, which was founded in 1865, are also colonial colleges — the nine institutions of higher education that were chartered before the United States was founded. The other two colonial colleges, Rutgers University in New Jersey and the College of William & Mary in Virginia, are public universities, which excludes them from the Ivy League.

Everyone has an idea of what having an Ivy League education means, but what, exactly, is the origin of the name itself? Here’s how this group of prestigious institutions came to be called the Ivy League.

Little-Known Facts About the Declaration of Independence

Author Timothy Ott
June 30, 2025

Love it?

It’s perhaps the most famous document in American history — the collection of fighting words that formally severed ties with the British Empire and launched a precocious new nation into existence. But while some of its features are familiar to the public, including a few phrases from the preamble and the conspicuous signature of John Hancock, many details surrounding the Declaration of Independence are little known beyond historians of the subject. 

Not unlike the esteemed local monuments that are ignored by longtime residents of New York City, Paris, or Rome, the Declaration of Independence is acknowledged for its importance but can be easily overlooked as a background accessory to daily existence. To help fill in the blanks, here are six facts about this illustrious founding document, which set the United States of America into motion back in that eventful summer of 1776.

Credit: Bettmann via Getty Images 

Thomas Jefferson Became Its Author Due to His Reputation as a Writer

By the time the Second Continental Congress convened in May 1776, Thomas Jefferson had not yet achieved the legendary status he enjoys today as an inner-circle founding father. Yet the quiet, 33-year-old lawyer and member of the Virginia House of Burgesses had already earned renown for penning the pamphlet A Summary View of the Rights of British America (1774), which laid bare many of the grievances against government abuses of power that resurfaced in the Declaration of Independence. 

Jefferson also eloquently defended the colonists’ cause early in the American Revolution as a co-author of The Causes and Necessity of Taking Up Arms (1775). As a result, he was a logical choice to join the Committee of Five tasked with crafting a Declaration of Independence in June 1776. According to the later recollections of fellow committee member John Adams, Jefferson suggested that Adams undertake the first draft, but the latter pushed the responsibility back to his younger colleague on the grounds that “I had a great Opinion of the Elegance of his pen and none at all of my own.”

5 Things You Never Knew About U.S. Currency

Author Mark DeJoy
June 30, 2025

Love it?

Tracing the development of a nation’s currency can provide a unique glimpse into the nation itself. But currency is complicated — its history often defies a simple straight-line narrative, and there are countless technicalities along the way that threaten to glaze over the eyes of anyone without a degree in economics. So let’s take a look at some of the most interesting moments in the history of U.S. currency, and leave the rest to the economists.

Credit: Ivy Close Images/ Alamy Stock Photo

The First National Bills Were Called “Continentals”

The first national paper currency for what would become the United States of America was issued by the Continental Congress in 1775. Known as Continental currency, it was intended as a way to fund the Revolutionary War. Though the currency started strong, a lack of adequate revenue sources (and mismanagement by the government) resulted in its quick depreciation. To make matters worse, Great Britain counterfeited the 1777 and 1778 issues of Continental currency in an act of wartime economic sabotage, and did so to such an extent that Congress was forced to recall both printings. As the currency’s value continued to plummet, Congress stopped printing new Continentals altogether in 1779; though the bills continued to circulate, they were worth only 1% of their face value by 1781.

What’s the Real Story of Isaac Newton and the Apple?

Author Tony Dunnell
June 30, 2025

Love it?

It’s one of the most iconic images in scientific history: Isaac Newton is sitting beneath an apple tree when a piece of falling fruit hits him on the head, sparking his revolutionary theory of universal gravitation. The tale has been told in countless textbooks and popular accounts, and has become a metaphor for “eureka” moments and the process of scientific discovery in general. 

But did an apple actually fall on Newton’s head? Or is this account a fanciful fiction that attached itself to the story of Newton’s brilliant scientific and mathematical insights? Here, we take a closer look at the well-known tale of Newton and the falling apple, and the truth behind one of history’s greatest scientific discoveries. 

Credit: Universal History Archive/ Universal Images Group via Getty Images 

The Story of the Falling Apple

You’re probably familiar with the basic tale of Newton and the apple tree. The story typically has a young Newton sitting beneath an apple tree in the gardens of Woolsthorpe Manor, his childhood home, which he happened to be visiting in 1666. Then, suddenly, an apple falls from the tree, hitting Newton square on the head and triggering his moment of inspiration. (Here the teller of the tale may insert a shout of “Aha!” or “Eureka!”) In this moment, Newton comes to the magnificent realization that the force that made the apple fall is the very same force that keeps the moon and planets in their orbits. And with this, his theory of universal gravitation is born. 

5 Military Strategies That Shouldn’t Have Worked But Did

Author Tony Dunnell
June 18, 2025

Love it?

History shows us that strategy in warfare can be far more important than superior numbers or technology. Indeed, some ingenious, unconventional, and seemingly foolhardy strategies have produced unexpected victories. 

Military doctrine, both ancient and modern, typically emphasizes principles such as concentrating force, securing flanks, and choosing the right terrain and weather conditions for the task at hand. But some of history’s most remarkable successes came from deliberately violating these established rules. 

We all know the story of the Trojan horse, in which Greek soldiers took the city of Troy — after a futile 10-year siege — by hiding in a giant horse supposedly left as an offering to the goddess Athena. While this famously left-field strategy is probably a myth, there are other wartime tactics that seemed destined for failure yet managed to achieve unlikely success.

Here, we look at five military strategies that shouldn’t have worked but did — maneuvers that succeeded precisely because they were so unexpected that their opponents had no contingency plans to counter them. 

Credit: Bettmann via Getty Images 

Hannibal’s Alpine Crossing 

In 218 BCE, during the Second Punic War, the Carthaginian general Hannibal was determined to take the fight directly to the Roman Republic. Defying all conventional military wisdom, Hannibal decided to make a surprise attack into Northern Italy — but to do so, he would have to march his massive army across the Alps. The plan was near suicidal. Hannibal’s forces included 70,000 men, 20,000 horses, and 37 war elephants, all totally unsuited for crossing one of Europe’s most formidable mountain ranges. 

It could have gone down as one of history’s greatest military disasters. Treacherous mountain passes, freezing temperatures, and potential ambushes by local tribes all conspired against Hannibal and his men — hundreds of whom died on the march — and yet the bulk of the force managed to cross the Alps in just 16 days. Rome never expected an attack from the north, and it was the audacity of Hannibal’s strategy that allowed him to establish a foothold in Northern Italy, from which he proceeded to attack the Romans on their own territory for the next 15 years. Hannibal crossing the Alps remains one of the most famous and celebrated achievements of any military force in ancient warfare. 

Why Do We Have Summer Vacation?

Author Nicole Villeneuve
June 18, 2025

Love it?

Summer vacation has been an integral part of American family life for more than a hundred years. This season of leisure is primarily due to one thing: School’s out. But why is there no school in summer? You may assume it’s a holdover from the country’s agrarian days, when children were required to help out on the family farm. But the summer vacation we know today actually had more to do with urban health concerns and public policy than with hay bales or cornfields. Here’s a look at the origin of summer vacation.

Credit: Peter Righteous/ Alamy Stock Photo

The Days of Sporadic Schooling

In the early 1800s, there was nothing even close to a standard school calendar in the United States. Communities ran schools as best suited their needs or abilities, leading to a very loose patchwork of local schedules. Rural schools were typically open in winter and summer in order to accommodate busy farm seasons that required planting in the spring and harvesting in the fall. (That said, even in the summertime there was plenty of farm work to do, and school attendance was often low.) City schools worked differently. Many operated almost year-round, taking only a short break each quarter. And the inconsistencies didn’t end there: Even within a single county, schools were extremely localized and their operational calendars could be starkly different.