Why Do We Clink Glasses When Toasting?

Author Tony Dunnell
April 9, 2026

Love it?

Few social rituals are as widespread or instinctive as clinking glasses after a toast. At weddings, dinners, and bars and pubs around the world, we reach across the table, touch glasses with a satisfying clink and a quick “cheers,” and take a sip. But where does this custom actually come from? Let’s take a look at the origins of this familiar custom, and try to sort the myth from reality.  

Credit: © Heritage Images—Hulton Archive/Getty Images 

The Poison Theory

The most common origin story goes something like this: In medieval times, clinking cups or glasses hard enough would cause liquid to slosh and spill from one vessel into another, so if your drinking companion had poisoned your cup, they’d be consuming poison too. As such, the clinking was a way to show that no drinks had been spiked, whether with belladonna, hemlock, arsenic, mercury, or any other common toxin — poison being a popular way of eliminating one’s rivals in the Middle Ages, especially among the nobility. 

Despite being widely repeated, this theory doesn’t make much sense if you think about it — and, indeed, it’s almost certainly not true. Both Snopes and Ripley’s have debunked the theory, concluding that all versions of this explanation are false. The logistics alone are problematic. Even if a cup or glass were filled to the brim — which in many cases it would not be — most of the clinking spillage would land on the floor, not in your companion’s cup. And if some drops of ale- or wine-diluted poison did enter, would it be enough to cause much harm? Perhaps not. 

What’s more, as Snopes points out, the practice of toasting to someone’s health dates back to the ancient world at least — well before individual glasses were common. In those times, everyone typically drank using shared vessels, rather than carrying around their own glass or cup. Producing your own private drinking vessel at a communal table would likely raise suspicion, rather than guard against it. 

7 Foods People Used To Think Were Healthy

Author Kristina Wright
April 9, 2026

Love it?

If you grew up in the 1950s, ’60s, or ’70s, you might remember starting the day with a bowl of frosted cereal and a glass of orange juice, followed by a sandwich on soft white bread for lunch. At the time, packaging and advertisements emphasized that these foods were nutritionally balanced, vitamin-enriched, and backed by modern science.

Many foods promoted as “healthy” in decades past rose to prominence during specific cultural moments: the post-World War II convenience boom, the rise of industrial food processing, and the low-fat movement of the 1970s and ’80s. In each case, marketing often outpaced scientific understanding. Looking back at these former “health foods” reveals how dramatically nutrition advice and public perception can shift over time — and how easily the label of “healthy” can be shaped by trends, rather than evidence.

Credit: © Chaloner Woods—Hulton Archive/Getty Images 

Margarine

Margarine surged in popularity beginning in the 1940s and especially through the 1960s and ’70s, when concerns about heart disease began to enter public consciousness. As early as the ’50s, public health messaging increasingly warned against saturated fats, and margarine — made from vegetable oils — was positioned as the modern, healthier alternative to butter.

Advertising leaned heavily on nutrition science. Packaging and print ads used phrases such as “heart-healthy,” “cholesterol-conscious,” and “made from pure vegetable oils.” Some campaigns featured endorsements from doctors or referenced emerging research about cholesterol, even when that research was still developing or incomplete. Margarine was presented not just as a butter substitute but as a proactive choice for protecting one’s heart.

What consumers didn’t realize was that many early margarines were produced through partial hydrogenation, creating trans fats. These fats were later found to raise LDL (“bad”) cholesterol and lower HDL (“good”) cholesterol — essentially the opposite of what the marketing promised. The widespread use of margarine as a health food was based on a simplified understanding of fat and heart disease, combined with persuasive messaging that emphasized innovation over long-term evidence.

The Weirdest Jobs From the Middle Ages

Author Timothy Ott
April 9, 2026

Love it?

Falling between the heyday of the Western Roman Empire and the onset of the Renaissance, the Middle Ages have an unflattering reputation as something of a backward epoch of human civilization. Wars raged across Europe, serfs toiled in backbreaking service to feudal lords, and diseases wiped out villages with little hope of preventing the next outbreak.

While the negative connotations may not be entirely fair, few would dispute that medieval citizens lived in more primitive conditions than their modern counterparts, and that the day-to-day necessities for survival were markedly different. As such, the era produced certain professions that filled important needs of the time but seem quite unusual in hindsight. Here are six of the strangest.

Credit: Universal History Archive/ Universal Images Group via Getty Images

Rat Catcher

Although the widespread belief that rats were the main carriers of the bubonic plague has largely been debunked, these critters nevertheless did spread disease in medieval urban centers and otherwise proved legitimate pests by feasting on food supplies. Thus gave rise to the era’s version of the exterminator, the rat catcher. 

Known to travel from town to town with a few of their rodent victims suspended from a stick, skilled rat catchers deployed methods that included setting traps in infested areas and unleashing dogs or ferrets on their quick-footed targets. It’s worth noting that while rat catchers were in demand in the Middle Ages, the profession reached its pinnacle in the crowded streets of Victorian London, with practitioners such as Jack Black achieving renown for their prowess in the field.

6 Popular Foods That Came From the Military

Author Tony Dunnell
April 9, 2026

Love it?

War is full of logistical challenges, one of the major concerns — in conflicts both ancient and modern — being how to feed the armies doing the fighting. Whether it’s Roman legionaries, British Redcoats, or modern infantry, soldiers have always needed a reliable supply of food to maintain both their energy levels and morale. As the old saying goes, “An army marches on its stomach.” 

Military rations have existed since at least the time of ancient Rome, when soldiers received 2 pounds of bread a day, sometimes with meat, olive oil, and wine. Today, U.S. troops are provided with MREs — “Meals, Ready-to-Eat” — which are carefully tested, formulated, and packaged rations designed to sustain soldiers during training and military operations. These MREs have a shelf life of three years and can survive being dropped from an aircraft. But not every soldier is a fan of these pouches of food, which they sometimes refer to as “Meals, Rarely Edible” or “Meals Rejected by the Enemy.” 

While modern MREs don’t often come with glowing reviews, some foods created specifically for soldiers — or adopted and popularized by the military — have become beloved by the civilian population. Here are six foods that managed to find their way from the ration pack to supermarket shelves across America. 

Credit: Kristoffer Tripplaar/ Alamy Stock Photo

M&Ms

In the 1930s, Forrest Mars Sr. (the son of Mars founder Franklin Clarence Mars) was traveling in Europe. According to confectionary legend, it was during this time that Forrest Mars observed soldiers eating chocolate pellets surrounded by a sugar shell during the Spanish Civil War. Inspired, he took the concept back to the United States where, in 1941, M&Ms were born. 

With World War II already underway, M&Ms were initially made specifically for the U.S. military, providing an ideal way for soldiers to carry energy-rich chocolate in tropical climates without it melting. In 1947, the candy was made available to the public, and its popularity has never waned since. 

7 Facts About the Earliest Humans on Earth

Author Sarah Anne Lloyd
April 9, 2026

Love it?

Recorded human history is just a tiny blip on the temporal radar. The Pyramids of Giza were built around 2500 BCE, but 4,500 years ago seems like yesterday when you compare it to the 300,000 years our species, Homo sapiens, has been around. Since our earliest ancestors didn’t leave as much behind, we know very little about how they lived.

“Human,” however, is a genus, not a species, and the history of humanity includes much more than sapiens. With new genetic research, we’re learning more about our ancestry all the time — but much of what we learn just raises even more questions. How closely related are we to Neanderthals? When did humans start making art? What were our ancestors’ day-to-day lives like? Pique your curiosity with these seven facts about the very earliest humans on Earth.

Photo credit: Peter Hermes Furian/ Shutterstock

The Earliest Homo Sapiens Were From Africa

Scientists first theorized in the 19th century that humans originated in Africa, and modern genetic science has largely confirmed that to be the case, though researchers are still working to determine the exact geography. Scientists also disagree on when and how humans dispersed. One early theory suggested that our Homo sapiens ancestors started to leave Africa around 60,000 years ago. Most non-African humans today can trace their origins back to a large exodus around that time, but smaller migrations may have started much earlier. Fossil evidence shows that groups of foragers arrived in Asia around 120,000 years ago, and brought skills such as deep-sea fishing and cave art with them. Other fossil discoveries, including a 210,000-year-old skull found in Greece, suggest some humans left Africa even earlier.

Photo credit: Bettmann via Getty Images

Early Human Species Mated With One Another Frequently

Homo sapiens, Neanderthals, and Denisovans — the latter of which is an early human species discovered in 2008 — share a common ancestor, Homo heidelbergensis. This species also probably came from Africa, but had reached modern-day Israel more than 700,000 years ago. It has been theorized that when one group of Homo heidelbergensis left Africa more than 400,000 years ago, some moved west to Europe and evolved into Neanderthals; others moved east to Asia and became Denisovans. Those who stayed in Africa evolved into Homo sapiens.

When Homo sapiens eventually left Africa, they encountered Neanderthals and Denisovans and started reproducing, and Denisovans and Neanderthals mated with one another, too. Those two species are now extinct, but they live on in modern human DNA, which contains a significant amount of both — most non-Africans are between 1% and 4% Neanderthal, and many people with Southeast Asian and Pacific Island heritage are up to 5% Denisovan. Recent research shows that people of African descent have some Neanderthal DNA, too, likely a result of back-and-forth migration.

7 Types of Furniture You Never See Anymore

Author Kristina Wright
April 2, 2026

Love it?

Furniture isn’t just about form and function — it’s a reflection of how we live. As technology evolves and lifestyles shift, pieces that were once considered household essentials can quietly fade into obscurity. From furniture designed around now-outdated technology to those that catered to social customs of another era, many former decor staples have all but disappeared from modern homes. 

If you’ve ever tried to fit a heavy television into a hulking TV cabinet or spent an hour at the “gossip bench” catching up with an old friend, you’re not alone. These once-popular furnishings tell the story of how we used to live. A few may linger in basements, guest rooms, or antique shops, quietly reminding us of how much things have changed. Here are seven kinds of furniture that were once common but are now rarely seen. How many have you owned?

Credit: Denver Post via Getty Images 

Waterbeds

Popular in the 1970s and ’80s, waterbeds promised a futuristic sleep experience with their wavelike motion and adjustable temperature. Though patented in California in the late 1960s, the concept had already rippled through science fiction — sci-fi author Robert Heinlein described similar beds in his novels years earlier, imagining them as ideal for both comfort and hygiene.

Once marketed as both cutting-edge and sexy, waterbeds quickly gained popularity, peaking in 1987 when they accounted for nearly 20% of all mattress sales in the U.S. One memorable slogan captured the era’s enthusiasm: “Two things are better on a waterbed. One of them is sleep.” But the charm faded as waterbeds’ drawbacks mounted: heavy frames, tricky maintenance, awkward moves, and a constant risk of leaks. Though rarely seen today, waterbeds remain a quirky relic of a bygone era — a ripple in sleep history that once made big waves.

The Most Popular Baby Name Every Year of the Last Century

Author Kristina Wright
April 2, 2026

Love it?

Over the past hundred years, baby-naming trends have largely been shaped by family traditions and popular culture. Classic names such as Mary, John, Betty, and James often appear repeatedly in family trees, passed down out of respect for previous generations and a desire to keep family legacies alive. By the latter half of the 20th century, parents found baby name inspiration in popular culture, including films, theater, and music. The name Jennifer, for instance, began its climb in the U.S. thanks to the George Bernard Shaw play The Doctor’s Dilemma, which debuted on Broadway in 1927. Today, Olivia and Liam are the reigning favorites, and it’s likely only a matter of time before names that are already in the top 10 — such as Mia, Mateo, Evelyn, and Elijah — claim the No. 1 spots.Here is a fascinating look at the most popular girls’ and boys’ names of the last century, based on data collected by the U.S. Social Security Administration from Social Security card applications.

Credit: Topical Press Agency/ Hulton Royals Collection via Getty Images

1924 to 1929

1924: Mary, Robert
1925: Mary, Robert
1926: Mary, Robert
1927: Mary, Robert
1928: Mary, Robert
1929: Mary, Robert

The “Roaring ’20s” brought new cultural, economic, and sexual freedoms for women, but the most popular female names of the Greatest Generation — those born between 1901 and 1927 — didn’t reflect this newfound sense of liberation. Mary remained the most popular girls’ name from 1924 to 1929, just as it had since 1900. A biblical name that appears in both the Old and New Testaments, Mary is the anglicized form of Maria and originated from the Hebrew Miryam. In 1924, the name Robert, favored by European royalty and nobility in the Middle Ages,” replaced John, another common biblical name, as the most popular boys’ name, ending John’s decades-long place at the top of the list.

How Many Children Did Each President Have?

Author Tony Dunnell
April 2, 2026

Love it?

In 1789, George Washington became the first president of the United States. Since then, 44 other individuals have served as commander in chief, each leaving a political legacy to be analyzed and judged in the course of time. But their legacies are not only political — they’re also familial. The number of children each president had is often overlooked, but on a personal level, few things could be more important. And in two cases, presidential children — John Quincy Adams and George W. Bush — went on to become presidents themselves, combining the familial with the political.   

With that in mind, here’s a look at how many children each U.S. president had. For the sake of clarity, this list is ordered by the total number of known biological children only. Fostered and legally adopted children are noted but not counted in the total due to various factors, including legal adoption not existing in the United States until 1851. George Washington, for example, had no biological children but did raise Martha Washington’s two children from a previous marriage (as well as her four grandchildren and several nieces and nephews), but they were not legally adopted. 

From the five presidents (including Washington) with no known biological children to the commander in chief with the most kids at 15, here’s a list of all the U.S. presidents in order of the number of children born to them.

Credit: Hulton Archive via Getty Images 

No Children

Five presidents fathered no known biological children. In some cases, this was likely due to infertility caused by medical issues, such as the tuberculosis infection Washington suffered before he was married. James Buchanan, meanwhile, remains the only U.S. president who never married. 

George Washington: 0 (2 stepchildren)
James Madison: 0 (1 stepchild)
Andrew Jackson: 0 (1 unofficially adopted child)
James K. Polk: 0 
James Buchanan: 0

What WWII Soldiers Carried in Their Pockets

Author Tony Dunnell
April 2, 2026

Love it?

World War II was one of history’s largest conflicts, spanning continents and engulfing nations from 1939 to 1945. In total, 127.2 million personnel were mobilized for war on all sides, with 70 million of those people fighting in the armed forces of the Allied or Axis nations. 

These numbers give us an idea of the vast scale of the war, but they don’t tell us anything about the soldiers themselves. If we zoom in to ground level and look at the daily lives of these individuals, we get a far more intimate picture of the war and those who fought it. Here, we move in even closer, to examine what the average enlisted U.S. soldier carried in the pockets of their service uniform. 

Some of these items were practical necessities, while others were highly personal. Whether they were reminders of home or just small comforts amid the chaos, these objects reveal much about the daily lives of World War II soldiers and the human experience of war. 

Credit: REVdoc/ Alamy Stock Photo

Photos of Home

Few pocket items held more emotional significance than photographs from home. These were often small, wallet-sized photos of spouses, significant others, children, or parents. The photos would be tucked into a pocket and carried into the field, providing crucial psychological support during the most difficult moments of the war. Having such a personal item helped a soldier to maintain their sense of individuality in the otherwise homogenizing environment of military life, in which group identification was strongly promoted. Remembering home by looking at a photo was also a reminder of what a soldier was fighting for. 

One other fascinating way that soldiers carried their photos was underneath a clear plexiglass strip they attached to the grips of their pistols — a form of weapon customization known as a sweetheart grip. 

The Way People Slept 300 Years Ago Would Horrify You

Author Bess Lovejoy
April 2, 2026

Love it?

Today, it’s common to complain of a lack of sleep; in some circles, it’s almost a badge of honor. Work and family obligations, not to mention endless digital distractions, often cut into our shut-eye. It’s easy to assume that we’re more poorly rested than our ancestors, who surely slumbered deeply and peacefully without all those glowing screens — right? Well, wrong.

Credit: © Buyenlarge—Archive Photos/Getty Images

Good Night — and Good Luck With the Bugs

The first problem was the beasts, both big and small. Before climbing into bed, families often conducted a nightly hunt for fleas, lice, and bedbugs, combing through bedding in a somewhat futile attempt to reduce the itching to come. Straw mattresses and shared blankets were ideal habitats for parasites, and the presence of dogs and livestock only made things worse. 

And we’re not kidding when we say livestock. In many rural households, animals were brought indoors at night for warmth and protection from predators and theft. Chickens, goats, and even cows might share the same space — along with all the noise, smells, and bugs they carried. (Speaking of smells, some families in East Anglia reportedly placed lumps of cow dung at the foot of the bed to ward off gnats, a solution that likely traded one problem for another.)

Even without animals, nighttime was anything but peaceful. Poor insulation meant drafts crept through walls and floors; open chimneys carried in soot and smells; chamber pots added their own aroma. From outside came the sounds of barking dogs, croaking frogs, and passing carts. Inside, every cough, snore, and shift of a bedmate was impossible to ignore.