The Best Historical Movies on Netflix

  • Scene from “The Pale Blue Eye”
Scene from “The Pale Blue Eye”
Credit: FlixPix/ Alamy Stock Photo
Author Michael Nordine
July 6, 2026

Love it?

Endlessly scrolling through Netflix without being able to decide what to watch is an all-too-common problem, but it’s easier to solve if you have a specific genre in mind. And while most of the history dramas streaming on the platform aren’t exactly historical themselves (as Netflix’s catalog is known to skew toward newer films), that doesn’t mean they aren’t worth watching. Here are five of the best, which tell stories ranging from complex biographies to a single day in World War I.

Credit: © 1993 Universal Pictures 

Schindler’s List

Steven Spielberg finally won Best Picture and Director for this wrenching World War II drama about Oskar Schindler, who is credited with saving the lives of more than 1,000 Jews during the Holocaust by employing them in his enamelware and ammunition factories. Schindler’s List won seven of the 12 Oscars for which it was nominated, with Liam Neeson’s performance as Schindler and Ralph Fiennes as SS officer Amon Göth among the nominations. It is widely considered one of the greatest films of all time

Credit: © Photo 12/Alamy 

Grave of the Fireflies

Elsewhere in the canon of heartbreaking World War II pictures, writer/director Isao Takahata’s animated classic might just be the saddest movie ever made. If this story of two orphaned Japanese brothers struggling to survive the final months of the war is notorious for how hard it can be to watch, it’s even more famous for how essential it is to witness. A deeply humane addition to Japan’s Studio Ghibli catalog, any viewing of Grave of the Fireflies is best accompanied by a box of tissues.

Credit: FlixPix/ Alamy Stock Photo

All Quiet on the Western Front 

Even if you’ve read Erich Maria Remarque’s classic World War I novel or seen its prior two film adaptations, you might not be prepared for 2022’s All Quiet on the Western Front. The film follows a fresh-faced German soldier whose idealistic view of the conflict is immediately (and tragically) shattered by the realities of trench warfare in a losing battle. It was nominated for nine Academy Awards, including Best Picture, and the four it won (most notably Best International Feature) place it alongside Ingmar Bergman’s Fanny and Alexander, Ang Lee’s Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, and Bong Joon-ho’s Parasite as one of the most-awarded foreign-language films in Oscars history.

Credit: FlixPix/ Alamy Stock Photo

The Pale Blue Eye

“What if there were a murder mystery at West Point in which a young cadet by the name of Edgar Allan Poe plays a pivotal role?” This might not be a question you’ve asked yourself, but the answer can be found in 2022’s The Pale Blue Eye. The movie stars Christian Bale as a grief-stricken detective asked to come out of retirement to investigate said case, and Harry Melling as Poe, the latter all but unrecognizable from his time playing Dudley Dursley in the Harry Potter movies. If you’ve followed his post-Potter career, which includes scene-stealing turns in everything from The Ballad of Buster Scruggs to The Queen’s Gambit, you’ll be unsurprised to learn that Melling is once again great here. Those familiar with director Scott Cooper’s previous work (namely Crazy Heart and Hostiles) will be equally unsurprised by The Pale Blue Eye’s grimmer moments, but the film’s evocative air is what makes it so memorable.

5 Historical Movies That Got It Wrong

  • Russell Crowe in “Gladiator,” 2000
Russell Crowe in “Gladiator,” 2000
Credit: AJ Pics/ Alamy Stock Photo
Author Michael Nordine
June 26, 2026

Love it?

Movies about history aren’t always known for their historical accuracy, which isn’t really a problem unless you’re basing all your knowledge of Napoleon on Napoleon. Some are especially egregious in their departures from the historical record, however, and the tension between fact and fiction can make for a confusing experience. Here are five historical movies that got the facts wrong.

For similar articles, subscribe to our sister brand Movie Brief, brought to you by our resident film critic Michael Nordine. You’ll receive a weekly review and recommendation of a new movie, whether in theaters or available to stream, as well as a list of 25 must-see movies when you first sign up.

Credit: Maximum Film/ Alamy Stock Photo

Braveheart

Braveheart was a massive success, grossing $200 million and winning four Academy Awards, including Best Picture and Best Director. If Most Historically Inaccurate Picture were a category, it would have won five. Mel Gibson’s 1995 epic about Scottish independence leader William Wallace is notorious for the many creative liberties it took, so much so that its Wikipedia article features an entire “historical inaccuracy” section with seven different subsections. For one thing, Wallace wasn’t born a poor farmer — he belonged to the lesser nobility — and the wife whose execution spurs his rebellion in the film might not have even existed.

John O’Farrell, author of An Utterly Impartial History of Britain, has cheekily observed that the film “couldn’t have been more off the mark if a plasticine dog was added to the cast and it was retitled William Wallace and Gromit.” Two other Gibson movies — The Patriot, in which he starred, and Apocalypto, which he directed — likewise have little historical basis.

7 Essential Films About World War I

  • Scene from “All Quiet on the Western Front”
Scene from "All Quiet on the Western Front"
Credit: © 1930 Universal Pictures
Author Michael Nordine
May 20, 2026

Love it?

The conflict dubbed the “war to end all wars” didn’t actually end all wars, of course, but it did inspire countless works of art. Among them are a lot of great movies, which, like World War I itself, tend to get overlooked while more attention is given to the Second World War. That’s a shame, as there’s no shortage of films illuminating the world-altering conflict of the early 20th century and putting a human face on it. Here are seven essential movies about World War I.

Credit: © 2019 Dreamworks Pictures

1917 (2019)

To say that 1917 is most memorable for its cinematography isn’t to damn it with faint praise. Presented as though it unfolds in just two continuous takes by masterful cinematographer Roger Deakins, the movie’s visuals lend an immediacy to every excruciating moment. Director Sam Mendes, who previously helmed American Beauty and Skyfall, based the film — which follows two British soldiers racing to tell a fellow battalion that it’s walking into a trap — on stories his veteran grandfather told him. 

Deakins won his second Oscar for his work on the film, which received a total of 10 nominations, including Best Picture and Best Director. The plot is thrilling in its simplicity: Above all else, 1917 is about how fraught each moment of this conflict was. Sometimes surviving another day is victory enough.

6 Historical Dramas Competing for Oscar Glory

  • Scene from “Hamnet”
Scene from “Hamnet”
Credit: © 2025 Hera Pictures/Neal Street Productions/Amblin Entertainment/Book of Shadows/Amblin Partners/Focus Features/Universal Pictures
Author Michael Nordine
March 4, 2026

Love it?

“Oscar bait” and “period piece” aren’t exactly synonymous, but there’s certainly a lot of overlap. Biopics and historical dramas tend to feature prominently throughout awards season, and this year has been no exception. 

Only four of the 10 Best Picture nominees at the 2026 Oscars take place in the present day (Bugonia, F1, One Battle After Another, and Sentimental Value), while two are set in the past but aren’t exactly historical (Guillermo del Toro’s take on Frankenstein and Ryan Coogler’s superlative vampire flick Sinners). 

The historical dramas nominated for an Academy Award this year, including but not limited to Best Picture, take place everywhere from 16th-century England to 1970s Brazil and tell an equally wide range of stories. Here are all six of them.

Credit: © FlixPix/Alamy 

Blue Moon

You might not know Lorenz Hart by name, but you’ve almost certainly heard his music. The famed lyricist is the wordsmith behind “My Funny Valentine,” “Manhattan,” and “Blue Moon,” among many other tunes; he disliked being known for the last of these, which is part of why Richard Linklater cheekily named his biopic about Hart after the classic song. 

Ethan Hawke earned a Best Actor nomination for his portrayal of Hart, while screenwriter Robert Kaplow is up for Best Original Screenplay. The entire movie unfolds over one night in 1943 as Hart is forced to endure the success of Oklahoma!, which his former writing partner Richard Rodgers wrote with Oscar Hammerstein II — a development our protagonist doesn’t exactly greet with joy for his longtime friend and collaborator.

5 Things Movies Get Wrong About the Medieval Era

  • Scene from “Tristan & Isolde”
Scene from “Tristan & Isolde”
Credit: Moviestore Collection Ltd/ Alamy
Author Michael Nordine
February 19, 2026

Love it?

There’s a reason you’ve never heard Nicole Kidman say, “We come to this place for a history lesson,” in her AMC commercials. Movies don’t have the best track record when it comes to historical accuracy, especially where the Middle Ages are concerned. Some dubious medieval tropes show up more than others, of course, and these are five of the biggest offenders.

Credit: 20th Century-Fox/ Archive Photos via Getty Images

Prima Nocta

In one of Braveheart’s most upsettingly memorable scenes, Edward Longshanks invokes prima nocta (Latin for “first night”): the right of a feudal lord to sleep with any female subject he so desires, especially on her wedding night. Not only does Hollywood often get the name wrong — it’s more accurately known as either droit du seigneur (“right of the lord”) or jus primae noctis (“right of the first night”) — but the practice most likely never existed. Braveheart is (in)famous for its historical inaccuracies, few of which have seeped into the collective imagination quite like this one. The tradition has been referenced in everything from Avengers: Age of Ultron to The Office, always as prima nocta — a sign that the writers in question first heard of it from Braveheart rather than any historical source.

7 ‘Historical’ Movies That Got It Wrong

  • “The Last Samurai,” movie 2003
“The Last Samurai,” movie 2003
Credit: Collection Christophel/ Alamy Stock Photo
Author Michael Nordine
January 13, 2026

Love it?

Depending on whom you ask, historical accuracy isn’t always necessary when it comes to making a good historical movie. Some filmmakers consider it important, but not as important as telling a compelling story; others dismiss the notion entirely. The movies on this list belong in the latter category and have been widely criticized by historians as a result — though many of them proved quite popular with audiences despite (or perhaps because of) their deviations from the historical record.

Credit: PictureLux / The Hollywood Archive/ Alamy Stock Photo 

300 (2007)

At its core, 300 is based on the genuinely amazing true story of roughly 7,000 Greek warriors (including 300 Spartans) holding off somewhere between 70,000 and 300,000 Persian soldiers at the Battle of Thermopylae. Given that it’s a Zack Snyder adaptation of a graphic novel by Sin City author Frank Miller, however, the verisimilitude ends there. Not that 300, with its mythical creatures and saturated color palette, was ever pretending to be the least bit realistic. So deeply silly that it can’t help being a bit charming here and there, the movie spawned a less successful sequel and at least one memorable scene that was quoted endlessly throughout the rest of 2007 and beyond.

The Best Historical Movies of 2025

  • Scene from the film “Hamnet”
Scene from the film “Hamnet”
Credit: Entertainment Pictures/ Alamy Stock Photo
Author Michael Nordine
December 11, 2025

Love it?

Nothing brings history alive quite like movies, which have the power to shape our understanding of the past as no other medium can. Some of this year’s best movies were works of historical fiction that both depicted actual events from the past and also speculated on others that might have occurred, using varying degrees of creative license to offer new takes on timeless subjects. Here’s a rundown of 2025’s most compelling historical cinema, offering fresh perspectives on the famous and forgotten events of yesteryear. 

Credit: BFA/ Alamy Stock Photo 

Hamnet

Though based on a work of fiction, Hamnet is about one of history’s most celebrated figures: William Shakespeare, whose son Hamnet is the namesake of Maggie O’Farrell’s widely acclaimed novel. Hamnet Shakespeare died at the tender age of 11, leading to centuries of speculation as to what effect that tragedy had on his father’s work — especially his magnum opus Hamlet, the title of which is far from a coincidence in this powerful film by Oscar-winning Nomadland director Chloé Zhao. A pair of devastating performances by Paul Mescal as the Bard and Jessie Buckley as his wife Anne (nicknamed Agnes) will get most of the attention throughout awards season, but young Jacobi Jupe is nothing short of princely as Hamnet himself.

The Biggest Movie the Year You Were Born

  • “Star Wars: Episode IV,” 1977
“Star Wars: Episode IV,” 1977
Credit: Allstar Picture Library Limited/ Alamy Stock Photo
Author Kristina Wright
October 29, 2025

Love it?

There’s nothing quite like the magic of movies to capture a moment in time. Every era of American history has its unforgettable films that stayed with us, and looking back at the biggest movies of each decade gives us a chance to remember the stories, stars, and cultural moments that defined generations.

This list spotlights the films that topped the domestic box office in the U.S. and Canada from the 1920s to the 2020s, revealing what audiences lined up to see each year. Because many movies continued to earn through long theatrical runs and later rereleases, each title on the list reflects the top-earning film in the year it was released. And while reliable box-office tracking dates back only to 1977, earlier titles on the list are based on the best available studio records and industry estimates.

So grab your popcorn, settle in, and take a trip through more than a century of movie history to rediscover the biggest film the year you were born.

Credit: George Rinhart/ Corbis Historical via Getty Images 

1920s

The 1920s cemented Hollywood’s status as the world’s movie capital and transformed film into the decade’s defining form of entertainment. Audiences loved films such as The Ten Commandments and The Big Parade, while matinee idols including Douglas Fairbanks, Rudolph Valentino, and Clara Bow captured the glamour and energy of the Jazz Age. By decade’s end, cinema itself was transformed — 1927’s The Jazz Singer introduced synchronized sound, marking the birth of the “talkie” and forever changing the way audiences experienced the movies.

1920 – Way Down East
1921 – The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse
1922 – Robin Hood
1923 – The Ten Commandments
1924 – The Sea Hawk
1925 – The Big Parade
1926 – What Price Glory?
1927 – The Jazz Singer
1928 – The Singing Fool
1929 – The Broadway Melody

5 Strange Rules From Hollywood’s Hays Code

  • Actors on set, 1937
Actors on set, 1937
Credit: Archive Photos via Getty Images
Author Nicole Villeneuve
September 24, 2025

Love it?

The golden age of Hollywood was an era of glamorous stars and timeless films, but behind the sparkle was a somewhat less romantic reality. From 1934 until the late 1960s, films were subject to strict moral scrutiny and censorship under the Motion Picture Production Code, better known as the Hays Code.

Named for politician Will H. Hays, who served as president of the Motion Picture Producers and Distributors of America, the set of rules was born from scandal. A series of high-profile controversies in the 1920s convinced the public that Hollywood was reckless, immoral, and a dangerous influence on the general public. Fearing government censorship, Hollywood studios opted to police themselves instead. 

On paper, the Hays Code guidelines promised protection for impressionable viewers. In practice, this meant a long list of oddly specific rules primarily targeting crime, profanity, or anything sexual in nature, many of which reflected social anxieties of the era but seem outlandish and outdated today. Here are five of the strangest rules from Hollywood’s Hays Code days. 

Credit: H. Armstrong Roberts/ClassicStock/ Archive Photos via Getty Images 

No “Raspberry” Sounds

It’s a sound most of us associate with children or silly teasing, but in 1930s Hollywood, making a “raspberry” sound was forbidden. The juvenile act of placing one’s tongue between the lips and blowing (also known at the time as the “Bronx cheer”) was deemed a “vulgar expression” and listed under the Hays Code’s profanity section. Other gestures of mockery were flagged as well, such as using the middle finger.

Of course, the rules didn’t just forbid gestures. Many words were also considered profane, including “cripes,” “lousy,” and “damn.” In fact, one of the most famous lines from 1939’s Gone With the Wind — “Frankly, my dear, I don’t give a damn” — almost didn’t make it past censors the Production Code Administration office, who ultimately allowed the line due to its literary roots. 

6 Retro Photos From Hollywood’s Golden Age

  • Marilyn Monroe dancing, 1954
Marilyn Monroe dancing, 1954
Credit: Bettmann via Getty Images
Author Timothy Ott
September 11, 2025

Love it?

Spanning from roughly the 1920s to the early ’60s, Hollywood’s golden age begat some of film’s most glamorous stars, classic quotes, and enduring scenes. Indeed, this era of moviemaking from the greater Los Angeles area was a time when the very idea of “Hollywood” as an idealized alternate reality was crystalized in the public consciousness.

While we now know that life wasn’t always so rosy behind the red carpet photo shoots and studio gates, that concept of old, glamorous Hollywood retains a strong emotional pull as a place where dreams were realized. Here’s a look at six photos that capture some of the defining faces, events, and achievements of the era.

Credit: Album/ Alamy Stock Photo 

King Kong Movie Poster

Promotional posters have been around since the inception of the motion picture industry, with full-color prints noting the leading men, women, and, in this case, creatures to be seen in the project being highlighted. King Kong (1933), of course, was a landmark film of its era, thanks in part to production techniques that included the pioneering usage of stop-motion photography and creation of an original score. 

While the movie’s promotional material effectively showcased the terrible power of its titular monster without being particularly groundbreaking, American film posters soon exhibited more innovative styles of collage and minimalism. And unlike the largely anonymous artists of the early 20th century, illustrators such as Bill Gold and Saul Bass enjoyed acclaim for their work in this particular field during the golden age of Hollywood.