During Prohibition, grape juice had “warnings” describing how to ferment it into wine.

Author Michael Nordine
July 23, 2025

Love it?

To say that Prohibition didn’t put an end to the “manufacture, sale, or transportation of intoxicating liquors” would be putting it lightly. Before the 18th Amendment was finally repealed by the 21st Amendment, the Volstead Act was the law of the land and bootlegging could land you in serious trouble. Yet many people took creative approaches to skirting that law, including vintners. Some winemakers used concentrated grape juice to make “wine bricks” that they were quick to clarify should definitely not be used for alcoholic consumption. To drive this point home, some such juices even came with “warnings.”

“Do not place the liquid in this jug and put it away in the cupboard for twenty-one days,” read one particularly unsubtle store sign, “because then it would turn into wine.” The packaging of a brand called Vino Sano advised consumers to “avoid the use of any kind of yeast, raisins, etc., otherwise fermentation sets in.” The many upstanding citizens who purchased wine bricks surely heeded that warning and enjoyed their alcohol-free grape beverage. On the other hand, because it wasn’t technically illegal to drink during Prohibition — only to manufacture, sell, or transport liquor — anyone who purchased grape juice and accidentally left it in a jug for three weeks could imbibe the resulting concoction without fear.

The ancient Tangut script had more than 6,000 symbols.

Author Rachel Gresh
February 27, 2024

Love it?

While traveling in Asia during the early 20th century, Russian linguist Nikolai Aleksandrovich Nevsky became fascinated by an extinct Sino-Tibetan language called “Tangut.” It was the language of the Tangut Empire, or Xi Xia (meaning “Western Xia”), a kingdom in modern-day northwestern China that declared its independence from China in 1038 and developed its own language. This short-lived dynasty was wiped out by the expanding Mongol Empire in 1227, less than two centuries after its establishment, and its language was nearly lost to history. 

Nevsky is credited with renewing interest in the Tangut script 700 years after the fall of the empire. In the late 1920s, he completed his first two manuals, which deciphered around 500 Tangut characters into Tibetan phonetic glosses (or notations). Thanks to Nevsky and other contributors in the field, some ancient Tangut scripts have been translated over the last 100 years, yet the Tangut language is still considered one of the most difficult in the world to decipher. 

Although it was modeled after the Chinese writing system, there are few similarities in their actual characters, and native Chinese readers cannot decipher Tangut. There are also no known native speakers, and because the Tangut script is a logographic writing system, each of its 6,000 complex characters represents an individual word without relating to pronunciation. By comparison, other scripts with logographic elements have far fewer characters, such as the 700 Egyptian hieroglyphs and 800 characters in the Maya writing system. Both of these scripts also contain some phonetic signs that represent syllables, allowing them to use fewer characters, and making them easier to decipher than the Tangut language. 

Ben Franklin thought the bald eagle had “bad moral character.”

Author Darren Orf
February 22, 2024

Love it?

The majestic bald eagle has been a symbol of the U.S. for as long as the country has existed; the imposing raptor first appeared on Massachusetts currency back in 1776. Yet not all Americans were fans of the bird of prey. In fact, arguably the most famous celebrity of the colonial era, Benjamin Franklin, was quite the opposite. In a letter addressed to his daughter and dated January 26, 1784, Franklin referred to the bald eagle as a “Bird of bad moral Character,” who “does not get his living honestly.” Philadelphia’s favorite son much preferred North America’s other avian native — the wild turkey — whom he called a “Bird of Courage.”

So why the anti-eagle sentiment? While it’s true that eagles do steal food from other birds, it’s likely a myth that Franklin wanted the turkey to be the national bird. Rather, the founding father’s words were actually maligning a particular institution that used the eagle on its seal. The Society of the Cincinnati, which formed in 1783 (and eventually supplied the name for the U.S. city), was a hereditary patriotic organization, meaning only sons of officers in the American Revolution could enter its ranks. According to Franklin, an organization based on family or heritage was uncomfortably similar to Britain’s status-driven culture, to which he believed American ideals were diametrically opposed. 

Comic books were once considered a national threat.

Author Nicole Villeneuve
July 15, 2025

Love it?

In the mid-20th century, comic books came under fire in the United States. Though the medium started out as reprinted collections of popular newspaper strips in the 1930s, it quickly grew into a diverse and wildly popular original art form. By the 1940s, original comics filled newsstands across the country; in 1948, 80 million to 100 million comic books were being sold in the U.S. each month. This was far from a niche hobby; comic books were mass entertainment for a range of ages (though primarily children), covering everything from superhero adventures and Westerns to genres such as horror, romance, sci-fi, and war stories.

Across the country, some church groups and parent organizations began expressing concerns that comics glorified violence and led to delinquency. Public comic book burnings began in the late 1940s as a protest. The concern reached fever pitch in 1954 with the publication of psychiatrist Fredric Wertham’s Seduction of the Innocent, which argued that comic books were a major cause of juvenile crime. Though widely publicized at the time, Wertham’s reporting was later found to be deeply flawed, often misrepresenting research to support his claims.

The outcry that followed led to Senate hearings and, eventually, the creation of the Comics Code Authority (CCA), a self-governed body that publishers used as a censorship guide to stay in the good books of distributors and newsstands. Under the code, scenes of violence, horror, and anything deemed morally questionable were heavily edited or banned altogether. The backlash reshaped the comic book industry for decades: Superheroes such as Batman, originally dark and gritty, were toned down to seem more wholesome, and entire publishers went out of business. The CCA had a decent hold on the industry until the 1970s, when specialty comic book stores started popping up. Direct relationships were established with publishers, bypassing most distributors, and eventually, the code was dropped, allowing the comic book industry to resume its expansive storytelling.

John Hancock’s house just went up for sale.

Author Bennett Kleinman
July 25, 2025

Love it?

Though 10 Marshall Street may not be as famous an address as 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, this three-story Boston home still holds an important place in American history. The residence was built and owned by founding father John Hancock, and it recently went up for sale for the first time in decades. The real estate listing describes the home as the “last extant property associated with [Hancock] in Boston” and the “only vernacular structure dating to the mid-1700s to survive in central Boston.” According to Boston city archaeologist Joseph Bagley, it’s also the 27th oldest house in the city. And it’s one of a few surviving homes in Massachusetts associated with a U.S. founding father, along with John Adams’ birthplace (built in 1681) and residence (built in 1731), which are part of a national historical park in Quincy, Massachusetts.

John Hancock — famous for being the first person to sign the Declaration of Independence — inherited the lot at 10 Marshall Street in the 1760s, and built the house in 1767. However, the 5,748-square-foot home is referred to as the Ebenezer Hancock House, named after John Hancock’s brother who lived there. Ebenezer later assumed the role of deputy paymaster general for the Continental Army and set up an office in the home where regimental commanders came to pick up soldiers’ wages during the American Revolutionary War. In 1778, France’s Louis XVI gifted 2 million silver crowns to the United States in support of the war effort, which were stored in this very building.

In 1785, John Hancock sold the property to a glass merchant, who later sold it to a shoe dealer in 1798. For the next 165 years, the building operated as a shoe store before it was left vacant and then acquired by the law firm Swartz & Swartz in 1976. While the current asking price isn’t publicly known, the property was assessed at $1.65 million in June 2025.

A 15-year-old invented Braille.

Author Sarah Anne Lloyd
July 15, 2025

Love it?

Braille is a set of tactile symbols designed for reading that’s used all over the world by blind and visually impaired people; letters and symbols are represented by different configurations of a grid of six raised dots. One could easily assume that such a widely accepted system was drafted by someone with a wealth of experience, but inventor and namesake Louis Braille was just 15 years old at the time, a student at the Institution Royale des Jeunes Aveugles (Roayl Institute for Blind Youth) in Paris.

Young Braille, who lost his sight in an early childhood accident, didn’t build the system from scratch. French inventor Charles Barbier had a keen interest in shorthand, and spent a lot of time developing alternate notation methods that didn’t require traditional writing. In 1815, he published a collection of methods for tactile reading, including a series of raised bumps in a 12-dot grid. Barbier had visually impaired people in mind when he designed this method, but as a sighted person, he couldn’t fully test it on his own.

When Braille first enrolled at the Royal Institute for Blind Youth in 1819, students learned to read raised cursive letters, which were not only difficult to read but very rarely taught kids to write. But in 1821, the school started using Barbier’s system, which was much easier to both read and write. Braille, who had firsthand experience with the system and knew how to improve it for visually impaired people, started developing his own version. His six-dot system, invented in 1824, was easier to read under a single fingertip, and could be adapted for math and music. He published his method in 1829, when he was 20 years old.

Walt Disney didn’t draw Mickey Mouse.

Author Michael Nordine
February 22, 2024

Love it?

Despite essentially being synonymous with his most famous character, Walt Disney didn’t draw Mickey Mouse. The iconic cartoon rodent was actually designed by Disney’s best friend, animator Ub Iwerks, in 1928. Indeed, A Mouse Divided: How Ub Iwerks Became Forgotten, and Walt Disney Became Uncle Walt author Jeff Ryan described Mickey as “basically the child of two dads.” The pair worked together for decades, and Iwerks created effects for such Disney classics as Mary Poppins and Sleeping Beauty, in addition to helping develop theme park attractions such as “It’s a Small World.” But he rarely received much credit for his contributions to the company, especially in comparison to its namesake. That began to change when his granddaughter Leslie Iwerks directed the 2000 documentary The Hand Behind the Mouse: The Ub Iwerks Story, but even today, Iwerks remains relatively unknown.

For the first 20 years of Mickey Mouse’s existence, Disney voiced the character himself. The world was introduced to Mickey in the 1928 animated short Steamboat Willie, though Disney produced two previous shorts featuring Mickey that same year, Plane Crazy and The Gallopin’ Gaucho, which weren’t picked up by distributors. Steamboat Willie was the first of these to feature sound, though Mickey didn’t utter his first actual words (“Hot dog!”) until the following year’s The Karnival Kid. Disney last lent his vocal talents to The Mickey Mouse Club between 1955 and 1958, though 2013’s Get a Horse! patched together previous recordings to once again feature him as the voice of the famous cartoon mouse.

In 1835, “The New York Sun” claimed life had been discovered on the moon.

Author Sarah Anne Lloyd
February 22, 2024

Love it?

When The New York Sun started publishing in 1833, the paper was just a penny per edition, making it popular with New York’s less affluent residents. Just a year later, it had the highest circulation of any newspaper in the United States. Unfortunately for its many readers, it had a tumultuous relationship with the truth. The most notorious incident was 1835’s “Great Moon Hoax,” a six-part series, supposedly written by someone named Andrew Grant with the Edinburgh Journal of Science, that claimed that life had been found on the moon.

The first article, published on August 25 that year, reported that the famous astronomer John Herschel had made a number of startling discoveries about the moon and distant planets after hauling a 7-ton telescope from England to the Cape of Good Hope, the southern tip of Africa. Herschel had actually set up a telescope in South Africa (though it was not quite that large), which both gave the story a sheen of truth and left the astronomer conveniently unavailable to deny the report. The next day, the Sun reported that Herschel had discovered stunning Earth-like landscapes; brown quadrupeds resembling small bison; a playful, single-horned, goatlike species; birds similar to cranes and pelicans; and some sort of spherical amphibian. The day after that, it was larger bison, more birds, and miniature zebras.

The descriptions only got more extravagant as the series stretched on, and the story started to lose credibility, although at one point a team of Yale scientists came to New York in search of the original Edinburgh Journal articles. On day four, when the Sun described short, hairy humanoid bipeds with batlike wings engaged in animated conversations, more readers and newspapers started to cry hoax. The paper acknowledged the fabrication in mid-September, admitting that the Edinburgh Journal had ceased publication already and Grant was a fictional character. Perhaps surprisingly, the incident didn’t hurt the paper — readership skyrocketed during the moon hoax week and the Sun continued publishing until 1950.

Caesar salad isn’t named after Julius Caesar.

Author Bennett Kleinman
February 22, 2024

Love it?

It would be easy to assume that the Caesar salad got its moniker from the famous Roman statesman of the same name, but the classic appetizer actually has no connection to Julius Caesar. Instead, it was named after an Italian American restaurateur and chef named Caesar Cardini. Cardini opened his first restaurant in California in 1919, one year before the onset of Prohibition. In the 1920s, he expanded across the border so that he could legally serve alcohol, opening a new eatery called Caesar’s in Tijuana, Mexico. It was at this restaurant that the recipe for Caesar salad was invented, and while the exact origin of the dish is debated, what’s certain is that Cardini claimed responsibility and marketed the salad under his name. 

According to Cardini’s daughter, Rosa, the original Caesar salad was improvised on a busy Fourth of July weekend in 1924. After running out of other ingredients, the story goes, Cardini gathered anything available — romaine lettuce, olive oil, egg, croutons, Worcestershire sauce, and Parmesan — and instructed his chefs to mix it together tableside for added showmanship. Others say the salad was created by Cardini’s brother, Alessandro, in an effort to impress a group of airmen dining at Caesar’s. And some argue that it was actually a restaurant employee named Livio Santini who came up with the salad, basing it on his mother’s recipe. Whatever the truth may be, Cardini moved back to Los Angeles and opened a shop in 1938 to sell bottles of his popular namesake salad dressing. 

The U.S. once had a political party called the “Know-Nothings.”

Author Timothy Ott
July 9, 2025

Love it?

Of all the political parties that have surfaced over the years, the Know-Nothings would seemingly rank somewhere between the Polish Beer-Lovers’ Party and the Canadian Extreme Wrestling Party as a tongue-in-cheek entity with a silly name. But there was nothing funny about this organization, which tapped into xenophobic fears en route to emerging as a major American political force in the 1850s. 

The Know-Nothings sprung from the nativist groups that organized in the United States in response to a rising tide of Catholic immigrants in the early 19th century. Officially working under the banner of the American Party, the Know-Nothings got their nickname from a membership-wide refusal to answer questions about the organization’s secret meetings. 

Publicly, the American Party espoused a platform that included a 21-year naturalization period for immigrants, the deportation of foreign-born criminals, the purging of Catholics from public office, and mandatory reading of Protestant versions of the Bible in schools. Coming of age at a time when the Whig Party was splintering over the combustible issue of slavery, the Know-Nothings rapidly gained adherents among those drawn to their populist messaging. The party swelled to an estimated 1 million members by the mid-1850s, with eight governors and as many as 53 members of Congress among its ranks. In 1856, the party even had its own presidential candidate in the form of ex-Oval Office resident Millard Fillmore. 

But that (losing) presidential campaign turned out to be the swan song for the Know-Nothings, as the relentless focus on immigration took a back seat among a populace that literally was coming to blows over the issue of slavery. Those in favor of maintaining the practice began drifting toward the Democrats, while many of those opposed found their way to another newly formed party, the Republicans. By 1860, the remaining Know-Nothings had coalesced with former Whigs under the Constitutional Union Party, another political faction doomed to a short life with the Civil War looming.