Which U.S. Presidents Were Multilingual?

Author Nicole Villeneuve
July 6, 2026

Love it?

English has always been the dominant language of United States presidents, but many have also spoken other languages. Some presidents were well versed in classical tongues such as Latin and Greek — a standard component of education in colonial America for those who could access it — while others spoke languages such as French, German, and even Mandarin to varying degrees. 

More than half of the 45 people who have served as POTUS (across 47 presidencies) are known to have spoken only one language: English. While determining fluency and proficiency can be difficult, 16 U.S. presidents are considered multilingual, meaning they spoke or competently understood three or more languages. Another five presidents were proficient enough in two languages to be considered bilingual. Here’s the full list of America’s most linguistically gifted commanders in chief.

Multilingual

Credit: GL Archive/ Alamy Stock Photo

John Quincy Adams: English, French, Dutch, German, Latin, Spanish, Greek, Italian, Russian

John Quincy Adams, the sixth president of the United States and also the eldest son of President John Adams, was proficient in many languages. At 10 years old, he accompanied his father to France during the American Revolutionary War. While in Europe, Adams attended schools and became fluent in Dutch, German, and French. He was so skilled at the latter that at age 14, he joined diplomat Francis Dana in Russia as a secretary and translator for the French language commonly spoken by the Russian aristocracy. According to the Adams Presidential Center, the younger Adams also spoke Greek, Italian, Latin, Russian, and Spanish.

6 Photos That Bring the Roaring ’20s to Life

Author Mark DeJoy
July 6, 2026

Love it?

The 1920s were a transformative decade: A convergence of economic prosperity, technological and industrial advancements, and flourishing artistic movements led to a cultural transition from the reserved social mores of previous eras to a modern age. In the United States, the decade became known as the “Roaring ’20s” because it was a time of exuberance, optimism, and rapid social change. Here are six photographs that capture the spirit of the era.

Credit: Bettmann via Getty Images 

Olympic Athletes

The 1924 Olympic Games in Paris were a pivotal moment for the event, as the Olympics reached a heightened level of popularity. Forty-four countries participated, and there was so much interest that more than a thousand journalists traveled to Paris to report on the Games. 

The U.S. swim teams dominated the swimming events, winning nine gold medals out of a possible 11, and 19 medals in total. This circa-1927 photograph depicts Olympic swimmer Harold Kruger in the midst of performing a series of irreverent stunt dives at an Olympic Pool in Long Beach, New York. Beginning with the release of the Leica camera in 1925, advancements in camera technology enabled capturing more kinetic images such as this one, as faster 35 mm film and shutter speeds could eliminate the motion blur that would’ve been present in previous years. 

Was Lady Godiva Real?

Author Tony Dunnell
July 6, 2026

Love it?

Britain is a land of countless myths and legends, including King Arthur and the Knights of the Round Table, Robin Hood and his band of Merry Men, and King Canute commanding the tide not to rise. Many of these staples of British folklore mix fact and fiction, blurring actual historical realities and often leaving readers somewhat confused as to which parts are based on truth. 

The legend of Lady Godiva is no exception. It’s a compelling tale of noble sacrifice and protest that has captivated the public imagination for centuries. And it’s a tale that blends historical fact with creative embellishment, which has led historians to debate what exactly happened. The most pertinent question, of course, regards our central character, Lady Godiva. Was she real? Did she actually exist? And if she did, did she ride naked through the streets of Coventry? Let’s take a look at this enduring legend and sort the facts from the fiction. 

Credit: Apic/ Hulton Archive via Getty Images 

Lady Godiva’s Naked Horseback Ride

According to popular legend, Lady Godiva, an 11th-century Anglo-Saxon noblewoman, was disturbed by the heavy taxation that her powerful husband, Leofric, ​​Earl of Mercia, had imposed on the citizens of Coventry, England. She repeatedly pleaded with him to reduce this burden on the townspeople. After numerous refusals, Leofric finally agreed to lower the taxes but only if his wife accepted what he considered an impossible condition: She would have to ride through the streets of Coventry in the nude. 

Lady Godiva called her husband’s bluff and took up his challenge. She issued a proclamation that all citizens must remain indoors with their windows shuttered on the appointed day. She then mounted her horse, naked save for her famously long hair, which covered her body as she rode through the silent streets of Coventry. Impressed by his wife’s bravery and devotion to her people, Leofric kept his promise and abolished the oppressive taxes.

Later versions of the legend introduced another character who has endured to this day, and whose name has become a common expression in the English language: Peeping Tom. Tom, according to folklore, was a tailor who, unlike his fellow townsfolk, couldn’t resist looking at the beautiful Lady Godiva as she rode by his window. For this violation, he was allegedly struck blind instantly — a divine punishment for disrespecting Godiva’s noble sacrifice. 

Why Were They Called the ‘Dark Ages’?

Author Tony Dunnell
July 6, 2026

Love it?

The term “Dark Ages” conjures images of a bleak, backward world, a period of human history marked by ignorance, barbarity, and intellectual stagnation. The term is typically used to refer to the era spanning roughly from the fifth to 10th centuries, but at times has referred to the entire Middle Ages, from the fall of the Western Roman Empire in 476 CE all the way to the beginning of Europe’s Renaissance in the 15th century. 

But were these centuries really so dark? Was the period — sandwiched between the advanced societies of classical antiquity and the cultural rebirth of the Renaissance — truly one of stark cultural regression? The reality of the “Dark Ages” is far more nuanced and complex than this pejorative label would suggest, and the term perhaps reveals more about the perspectives of later historians than the actual lived experiences of medieval people.

Credit: WorldPhotos/ Alamy Stock Photo

Who Called Them the “Dark Ages”?

The concept of the “Dark Ages,” if not the term itself, is associated with one name more than any other: Francis Petrarch, a 14th-century Italian scholar, poet, and humanist who was regarded as the greatest scholar of his time. He saw classical antiquity as an age of light due to its cultural achievements, while what followed — including the time in which he lived — was an age of darkness. “This sleep of forgetfulness will not last for ever,” he wrote. “When the darkness has been dispersed, our descendants can come again in the former pure radiance.” 

Petrarch was so influential in his time that the humanist attitudes of 15th-century Italy — attitudes that led directly to the Renaissance — would not have been possible without him. It’s no surprise, then, that his concept of a long dark age took hold in both popular and academic circles, and remained a potent and widely accepted idea for centuries to come. 

It’s worth noting that historians have also used the term “Dark Ages” to refer to something more specific and less pejorative. In his work Annales Ecclesiastici, the Italian cardinal Caesar Baronius (1538-1607) coined the term “Dark Ages,” albeit in its Latin form, saeculum obscurum. But Baronius was using the term to refer specifically to the scarcity of written documents around the 10th and 11th centuries relative to earlier periods. 

This was not a moral judgment, but a statement of fact: There were indeed fewer written records from this period. The Romans were excellent record keepers, so when the empire fell there was a notable decline in historical texts and documents for several hundred years afterward. The Early Middle Ages have been seen by historians as “dark” simply because it’s difficult to know what happened.  

The Best Historical Movies on Netflix

Author Michael Nordine
July 6, 2026

Love it?

Endlessly scrolling through Netflix without being able to decide what to watch is an all-too-common problem, but it’s easier to solve if you have a specific genre in mind. And while most of the history dramas streaming on the platform aren’t exactly historical themselves (as Netflix’s catalog is known to skew toward newer films), that doesn’t mean they aren’t worth watching. Here are five of the best, which tell stories ranging from complex biographies to a single day in World War I.

Credit: © 1993 Universal Pictures 

Schindler’s List

Steven Spielberg finally won Best Picture and Director for this wrenching World War II drama about Oskar Schindler, who is credited with saving the lives of more than 1,000 Jews during the Holocaust by employing them in his enamelware and ammunition factories. Schindler’s List won seven of the 12 Oscars for which it was nominated, with Liam Neeson’s performance as Schindler and Ralph Fiennes as SS officer Amon Göth among the nominations. It is widely considered one of the greatest films of all time

Credit: © Photo 12/Alamy 

Grave of the Fireflies

Elsewhere in the canon of heartbreaking World War II pictures, writer/director Isao Takahata’s animated classic might just be the saddest movie ever made. If this story of two orphaned Japanese brothers struggling to survive the final months of the war is notorious for how hard it can be to watch, it’s even more famous for how essential it is to witness. A deeply humane addition to Japan’s Studio Ghibli catalog, any viewing of Grave of the Fireflies is best accompanied by a box of tissues.

Credit: FlixPix/ Alamy Stock Photo

All Quiet on the Western Front 

Even if you’ve read Erich Maria Remarque’s classic World War I novel or seen its prior two film adaptations, you might not be prepared for 2022’s All Quiet on the Western Front. The film follows a fresh-faced German soldier whose idealistic view of the conflict is immediately (and tragically) shattered by the realities of trench warfare in a losing battle. It was nominated for nine Academy Awards, including Best Picture, and the four it won (most notably Best International Feature) place it alongside Ingmar Bergman’s Fanny and Alexander, Ang Lee’s Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, and Bong Joon-ho’s Parasite as one of the most-awarded foreign-language films in Oscars history.

Credit: FlixPix/ Alamy Stock Photo

The Pale Blue Eye

“What if there were a murder mystery at West Point in which a young cadet by the name of Edgar Allan Poe plays a pivotal role?” This might not be a question you’ve asked yourself, but the answer can be found in 2022’s The Pale Blue Eye. The movie stars Christian Bale as a grief-stricken detective asked to come out of retirement to investigate said case, and Harry Melling as Poe, the latter all but unrecognizable from his time playing Dudley Dursley in the Harry Potter movies. If you’ve followed his post-Potter career, which includes scene-stealing turns in everything from The Ballad of Buster Scruggs to The Queen’s Gambit, you’ll be unsurprised to learn that Melling is once again great here. Those familiar with director Scott Cooper’s previous work (namely Crazy Heart and Hostiles) will be equally unsurprised by The Pale Blue Eye’s grimmer moments, but the film’s evocative air is what makes it so memorable.

The Year That Changed American Shopping

Author Tony Dunnell
July 1, 2026

Love it?

In 1962, while Americans anxiously followed escalating Cold War tensions, witnessed the violent racial integration of the University of Mississippi, and mourned the tragic death of Marilyn Monroe, a quiet but monumental shift was occurring in the way people shopped. 

In the space of just seven months, three retail chains opened their very first stores: Kmart, Target, and Walmart. 

Before this, the retail landscape consisted of department stores, five-and-dime variety stores, hardware specialists, supermarkets, and mom and pop stores — all of which would face a new reckoning with the arrival of these giant retailers.

Of course, they weren’t the only companies to see how suburbanization, a booming middle class, and widespread car ownership had opened up new retail opportunities. Woolco (owned by the F.W. Woolworth Company) and Meijer (Thrifty Acres) also opened in 1962, along with a handful of other discount retailers. But it was Kmart, Target, and Walmart that managed to outlast the competition. 

At the time, however, perhaps none of them could have foreseen quite how much they would change the retail landscape — and, together, permanently alter the way Americans shopped, spent, and lived.

Credit: © American Stock Archive—Archive Photos/Getty Images 

The Store That Set the Pace

Kmart was first out of the gate. On March 1, 1962, the S.S. Kresge Company — a long-established chain of five-and-dime variety stores founded in Detroit in 1899 — opened its first full-sized, 80,000-square-foot discount store in Garden City, Michigan. It was the brainchild of Kresge President Harry Cunningham, who had spent years studying the emerging discount retail model before deciding to go all in. 

The discount model itself was not a brand-new invention, but Kmart revolutionized how it was scaled, operated, and marketed. The company was able to undercut traditional retail stores through extreme supply chain efficiency, high-volume sales, and centralized distribution.

The results were swift and staggering. Seventeen additional Kmart stores opened before the year was out, and the company continued its aggressive expansion, opening an average of 85 stores per year over the next two decades. For about 30 years, Kmart was one of the clear front-runners among American discount retailers, reaching its peak in 1994 when it operated more than 2,400 stores globally and employed some 350,000 people. 

But Kmart’s dominance eventually faded. Increased competition from Walmart and Target, combined with a series of poor strategic decisions in the 1990s, sent the company into bankruptcy in January 2002. It merged with Sears in 2005 and has since dwindled to near extinction, with only a handful of remaining stores. But for several decades, the blue light special — Kmart’s iconic flash sale — was about as American as apple pie.

Why Do We Cross Our Fingers for Luck?

Author Bess Lovejoy
June 30, 2026

Love it?

Crossing your fingers for luck is one of the most familiar gestures in the English-speaking world. We nervously do it before a big moment, ask friends to keep their fingers crossed for a specific outcome, and use the crossed fingers emoji as a shorthand for hope. But where did the custom come from? How did looping our middle finger over our index finger become a symbol of good luck and hopefulness?

Credit: © Zebrik/Dreamstime.com

Crossing Fingers Once Required a Friend

Today, crossing your fingers is a solitary act. Historically, however, it was a social ritual. One widely cited origin theory traces the custom to pre-Christian Europe, where the shape of a cross was believed to possess special power. According to this interpretation, the point where two lines intersected was seen as a place where beneficial spirits gathered. A wish made upon a cross could become anchored at that intersection until it came true.

Originally, making the gesture of a cross required two people. One person would make a wish while another crossed their index finger over the wish-maker’s finger, forming a small cross. The second participant effectively lent support to the wish, helping guide it toward fulfillment.

Over time, the ritual became simpler. Instead of requiring a partner, people began creating the symbol themselves, first by crossing the index fingers of both hands and eventually by crossing the index and middle fingers of one hand. The modern gesture may be the descendant of this much older cooperative custom.

What Life Was Really Like in 1776

Author History Facts Team
June 30, 2026

Love it?

As America marked its 250th birthday, you likely heard plenty about the Declaration of Independence, the Founding Fathers, and the birth of a nation. But what was everyday life like for ordinary Americans? 

Throughout the week, we explored what the country looked, sounded, tasted, and felt like in 1776 — a world very different from our own. In case you missed our special anniversary series, here’s a look back at what life was really like in the year the United States was born. 

Credit: History Facts

What Americans Ate in 1776 

In 1776, the newly declared independent United States didn’t have a national cuisine. In fact, it barely had a national identity. What Americans did have was a diet shaped by a remarkable mix of influences.

Credit: History Facts

How Americans Dressed in 1776 

The year 1776 was one of the most consequential in American history, marking the birth of a new nation. Yet amid the debates and battles, everyday life continued — and with it, the business of deciding what to wear. 

Credit: History Facts

Why America Doesn’t Use the Metric System

America’s relationship with measurement is not exactly as straight as a ruler — indeed, the current measurement mix is far from metric-free. So how did we get here?

Credit: History Facts

Did Colonial Americans Sound British? 

Did the likes of George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, and Abigail Adams sound like King George III, William Wordsworth, and Jane Austen?

Credit: History Facts

What America Looked Like in 1776, in 5 Images 

These centuries-old images provide a visual record that helps bring the world of 1776 into focus, painting a picture of city streets, family kitchens, Indigenous diplomacy, and a society on the cusp of becoming something entirely new.

Love these kinds of stories? We have plenty more.

Why Americans Spell English Words Differently

Who Was the Funniest Founding Father?

7 Things You Forgot Happened During the Revolutionary War

5 Common Items From Colonial America You’ve Never Heard Of

7 Myths About the American Revolution

A Day in the Life of a Settler in Colonial America

7 Little-Known Facts About America’s Founding Fathers

5 Historical Movies That Got It Wrong

Author Michael Nordine
June 26, 2026

Love it?

Movies about history aren’t always known for their historical accuracy, which isn’t really a problem unless you’re basing all your knowledge of Napoleon on Napoleon. Some are especially egregious in their departures from the historical record, however, and the tension between fact and fiction can make for a confusing experience. Here are five historical movies that got the facts wrong.

For similar articles, subscribe to our sister brand Movie Brief, brought to you by our resident film critic Michael Nordine. You’ll receive a weekly review and recommendation of a new movie, whether in theaters or available to stream, as well as a list of 25 must-see movies when you first sign up.

Credit: Maximum Film/ Alamy Stock Photo

Braveheart

Braveheart was a massive success, grossing $200 million and winning four Academy Awards, including Best Picture and Best Director. If Most Historically Inaccurate Picture were a category, it would have won five. Mel Gibson’s 1995 epic about Scottish independence leader William Wallace is notorious for the many creative liberties it took, so much so that its Wikipedia article features an entire “historical inaccuracy” section with seven different subsections. For one thing, Wallace wasn’t born a poor farmer — he belonged to the lesser nobility — and the wife whose execution spurs his rebellion in the film might not have even existed.

John O’Farrell, author of An Utterly Impartial History of Britain, has cheekily observed that the film “couldn’t have been more off the mark if a plasticine dog was added to the cast and it was retitled William Wallace and Gromit.” Two other Gibson movies — The Patriot, in which he starred, and Apocalypto, which he directed — likewise have little historical basis.

Did Colonial Americans Sound British?

Author Tony Dunnell
June 26, 2026

Love it?

In the 17th century, the population of the American colonies was largely British, and English — while certainly not the only tongue spoken — became the predominant language throughout what is now the eastern U.S. 

It raises the question: Did early Americans speak with a British accent? And did the likes of George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, and Abigail Adams sound like King George III, William Wordsworth, and Jane Austen? 

The answer is almost certainly no — but why? Here’s a look at when British and American accents began to diverge, resulting in distinct ways of speaking on either side of the Atlantic. 

Credit: © Bettmann Archive/Getty Images 

American English Is Born

Britain has always been, and still is, extraordinarily rich in accents, despite being about the same size as the state of Oregon. You only have to travel a few hours for the accent and often the dialect to change in very notable ways. Back in colonial times, as now, someone from London sounded quite different from a person from Yorkshire, Devon, or Liverpool — and accents were even more distinct among England, Scotland, Wales, and Ireland. 

But as soon as settlers from different regions of Britain began landing in the American colonies and started mixing with each other more than they did back in Britain, something known as dialect leveling began to take place. Dialect leveling is a phenomenon that occurs when a variety of different ways of speaking come into contact with one another, and the features that are most common — including accent and pronunciation — tend to overtake others. The outcome is a leveling or smoothing out of differences, eliminating distinct regional or social linguistic elements and creating a more standardized form. 

In America, the process was quick. Within a generation, Americans born in settlements such as Jamestown in the early 1600s were already speaking differently than their parents. And it wasn’t only the British mixing with one another. These early colonists came into contact with other European settlers speaking Dutch, Swedish, French, and Spanish, as well as Indigenous languages and, later, the languages of enslaved Africans — all of which contributed to the creation of early American English.