5 Things You Never Knew About the $2 Bill

Author Timothy Ott
March 6, 2025

Love it?

Without question, the $2 bill is the black sheep of the U.S. currency family. Despite being a small enough denomination to fairly easily acquire, the “Tom” — nicknamed for its portrait of Thomas Jefferson — rarely surfaces in day-to-day transactions. In fact, many folks erroneously believe the $2 note to be out of circulation, with some cashiers even refusing to accept these unfamiliar bills.

Make no mistake, the $2 bill is very real and remains in regular circulation, albeit at a smaller volume compared to commonly found denominations such as $1s and $20s. But while the Tom lacks the everyday presence of the others, it also sports a more intriguing backstory than its brethren bills. Here are five fun facts about the not-so-terrible $2.

Credit: Art-Studio/ Alamy Stock Photo

Six Types of $2 Bills Have Appeared Since 1862

Not counting the $2 denominations that appeared with the Continental Currency notes that funded the American Revolution, there have been six categories of $2 bills issued by the U.S. federal government. These are: United States Notes, which initially featured Alexander Hamilton in 1862 before switching to Jefferson seven years later; National Bank Notes, which circulated during the Reconstruction years and are known as the “Lazy Deuce” for their horizontal digits; Silver Certificates, which featured a series of elaborate vignettes during their mid-1880s to mid-1920s run; Treasury Coin Notes, which featured Union General James B. McPherson and were only printed in the 1890s; Federal Reserve Bank Notes, which displayed the USS New York battleship and received an even briefer run after World War I; and Federal Reserve Notes, which appeared in 1976 to celebrate the United States bicentennial after the $2 bill had been discontinued for a decade due to its low usage.

What Was the First Submarine Journey? 

Author Tony Dunnell
March 6, 2025

Love it?

Submarines have come a long way in the last century. During World War I, their effectiveness became truly apparent, with German U-boats sinking more than 5,000 Allied ships, forever changing the nature of war at sea. Since then, submarine technology has advanced greatly, and today they perform a wide variety of tasks in our seas and oceans. 

Civilian submarines engage in exploration, marine science, salvage operations, and the construction and maintenance of underwater infrastructure. In the military arena, meanwhile, submarines prowl the oceans undetected, capable in some cases of staying submerged for months at a time. Military submarines offer a range of capabilities, whether it’s reconnaissance, the covert insertion of special forces, silently attacking enemy surface ships, or — in the case of the most advanced nuclear submarines — strategic nuclear deterrence. 

The use of submarines, however, predates World War I by longer than we might imagine. For many centuries, inventors and visionaries have conceived of vessels capable of moving underwater. These early ideas, ranging from theoretical designs to actual working prototypes, represent crucial steps in maritime technology. Here, we look at three submarine journeys that represent firsts of their kind, from the ancient world to the first use of a submarine in combat. 

Credit: Classic Image/ Alamy Stock Photo

Alexander the Great’s Legendary Submarine

It’s hard to say with certainty when the first submarine journey occurred, partly because of how, exactly, we define a submarine. If simply defined as a submersible craft used for warfare, it could be argued that the earliest documented case dates all the way back to Alexander the Great. According to Aristotle’s work Problemata, Alexander, or at least his divers, descended into the depths during the siege of Tyre in 332 BCE, possibly to destroy the city’s underwater defenses. Written works and paintings over the years have told legendary stories of Alexander exploring the sea in what could be described as a diving bell, bathysphere, or rudimentary submarine. But like many tales involving Alexander the Great, the story has been embellished over the centuries.

The U.S. Presidents’ Favorite Books

Author Tony Dunnell
March 6, 2025

Love it?

In 1771, George Washington wrote, “I conceive a knowledge of books is the basis upon which other knowledge is to be built.” He was the first of many United States presidents who appreciated books and valued the power of reading. Throughout American history, presidents have found solace, inspiration, and intellectual stimulation in the pages of books both classic and contemporary, from famed historical works to novels that reveal the nature of the human experience. 

Not all presidents, of course, have been voracious readers, but in large part the leaders of the United States have furthered their knowledge with books. Here are some of the U.S. presidents’ favorite reads. 

Credit: Photo 12/ Universal Images Group via Getty Images 

George Washington

Washington collected more than 1,200 publications over the course of his lifetime, and it’s hard to say for sure which book he valued the most. We know he read classics of fiction such as Don Quixote and The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy, as well as books about politics, warfare, and other practical matters. 

One subject particularly close to the first president’s heart was agriculture. When asked to make an educated guess about Washington’s favorite book, historian Kevin Butterfield, executive director of the Fred W. Smith National Library for the Study of George Washington, named the English translation of Henri Louis Duhamel du Monceau’s Éléments d’agriculture (variously translated as The Elements of Agriculture or A Practical Treatise of Husbandry). 

How the Hundred Days Offensive Ended World War I

Author Timothy Ott
February 27, 2025

Love it?

For many people, the enduring image of World War I is that of infantry troops bunkered down in a trench somewhere along the hazy battlefield of the war’s Western Front. Indeed, while stagnant trench warfare was the norm for a large chunk of the conflict in Europe, it was the transition to a mobile phase of the war in 1918 that brought about its fairly sudden conclusion, with the success of a rapidly moving offensive across late summer and early autumn that year. Here’s a look at how the Hundred Days Offensive ensured victory for the Allied forces.

Credit: ullstein bild Dtl./ ullstein bild via Getty Images 

The German Spring Offensive Failed To End the War

Following Russia’s exit from the war in late 1917, German General Erich Ludendorff funneled troops to the Western Front for what became known as the Spring Offensives. Beginning with Operation Michael on March 21, 1918, the German army launched four major attacks by mid-June that brought it within 55 miles of Paris but failed to deliver a knockout blow.

The Germans struck again near the French city of Reims on July 15, commencing the Second Battle of the Marne. However, they were unable to split the French army as intended, and instead were driven back when the Allies launched a counterattack three days later.

At a conference of Allied leaders on July 24, Supreme Allied Commander Ferdinand Foch outlined plans for a rapid-fire series of strikes against the exhausted and stretched-out German army. These attacks formed what later became known as the Hundred Days Offensive. 

5 Astonishing Facts About the Berlin Airlift

Author Tony Dunnell
February 26, 2025

Love it?

The Berlin Airlift, one of the most remarkable humanitarian and logistical operations in history, was a product of the brewing Cold War tensions in the aftermath of World War II. Germany was divided into four zones of occupation: three controlled by each of the Western Allied powers (the United States, the United Kingdom, and France) and a fourth controlled by the Soviet Union. The German capital city, Berlin, which lay inside the Soviet zone, was itself divided into four zones of occupation between the Western Allies and the Soviets. 

It was almost inevitable, then, that war-ravaged Berlin would become a focal point of the burgeoning Cold War. Tensions reached a peak in March 1948, when the Allied powers decided to unite their occupation zones into a single economic unit and introduced a new currency, the Deutsche Mark, in West Germany.

The Soviets were not impressed. Joseph Stalin wanted Germany to remain weak and unthreatening, serving as a buffer between the Soviet Union and the West. He did not want to see the Allies help Germany rebuild its economy, nor did he want the U.S. supplying goods to Germany in what would be a sure sign to the communists that America’s capitalist economy was flourishing. 

So, on June 24, the Soviets cut off all land access to West Berlin — which was located far within Soviet-controlled East Germany — in what became known as the Berlin Blockade. In response, the Allies launched the Berlin Airlift, ferrying supplies into the capital city by plane. Here are five facts about that historic feat, from the incredible logistics involved to the heartwarming efforts of the “candy bomber.” 

Credit: Roger Goodwin/ Alamy Stock Photo

West Berlin Needed At Least 4,500 Tons of Supplies Daily 

With the land blockade in place, the only way the Allies could access Berlin was via three narrow, 20-mile-wide air corridors over East Germany into West Berlin. Allied planners calculated that in order to keep the more than 2 million inhabitants of West Berlin alive, the city required a minimum of 4,500 tons of supplies daily, including 1,534 tons of food and 3,475 tons of coal for electricity and heating. Without supplies, West Berlin only had enough food for 36 days, after which the citizens would begin to starve.

Many people, including the Soviets, thought supplying the city would be an impossible task, forcing the Allies to abandon West Berlin and leave it under communist control. But the Allies were undeterred. The airlift went ahead, and by the autumn of 1948, the Allies were delivering more than 5,000 tons of food, coal, and other supplies every day — a figure that grew to 8,893 tons per day by the end of April 1949. 

Why Do Actors Sound So Different in Old Movies?

Author Michael Nordine
February 20, 2025

Love it?

Despite their differences, the United States and England have a lot in common. A “special relationship” has bound the countries together since at least 1946, when Winston Churchill coined the phrase after the Allied victory in World War II. For evidence of the similarities, one need look no further than the movies of that era. Actors such as Cary Grant, Katharine Hepburn, and other luminaries of Hollywood’s golden age — which peaked in the 1930s and ’40s — spoke in a way that was common at the time but now seems a relic of the age. 

Technology was a factor: Sound recording wasn’t as advanced as it is today, with companies such as Western Electric promising “noiseless recording” that might not sound fully noiseless to 21st-century ears. And many actors of the era began their careers on the stage and had been trained to deliver lines in a way that likewise sounds old-fashioned. Most distinctive of all, however, was the accent. It sounded like a fusion of American English and British English, hence its name: the transatlantic accent.

Credit: Archive Photos/ Moviepix via Getty Images

Also known as the mid-Atlantic accent, this affected manner of speech wasn’t actually a cinematic invention. It has its roots in the Northeastern U.S. elite accent, which can be traced back to wealthy New Englanders of the late 19th century. That accent is itself based on Received Pronunciation (RP) — often considered the “standard” British accent and also known as the Queen’s English, Oxford English, or BBC English. As such, the transatlantic voice is closer to accents in New York, Boston, or Philadelphia than those heard in Chicago, Dallas, or Los Angeles. 

Americans who were taught to adopt this accent, often in elocution class at private schools, were told it was the “proper” way to speak, and because it sounded formal it became common among actors taking on serious roles — first onstage and then on-screen. Here is an example of the accent in The Philadelphia Story, a classic among classics, starring Grant and Hepburn:

A few of the accent’s trademarks can be heard in that scene, namely the dropped “r” sounds (“mothah” rather than “mother), also known as a non-rhotic accent; an emphasis on the hard “t” (“writah” rather than “writer”); and stretching certain vowels (“dance” becomes “dahnce”), which is called a short-a split

The transatlantic accent is also associated with the kind of back-and-forth, rapid-fire delivery often seen in screwball comedies such as His Girl Friday, starring Grant alongside Rosalind Russell. Another practitioner was Orson Welles, who used it in arguably the most acclaimed film of all time: Citizen Kane, the masterpiece he co-wrote, produced, directed, and starred in as the title character. Beginning in the 1930s, actors working within the Hollywood studio system were actively encouraged to do likewise.

Why Are Historical Doors So Large?

Author Kristina Wright
February 20, 2025

Love it?

When visiting a historic site — whether an ancient or medieval castle, cathedral, or statehouse — you may have noticed an eye-catching detail about the architecture: doors that are far larger than those found in modern buildings.

Today, a standard interior door is typically 80 inches (6 feet, 8 inches) tall and 28 inches to 36 inches wide, while exterior doors are usually the same height but range from 32 inches to 42 inches wide for single doors and 60 inches to 72 inches for double doors. Historically, however, door sizes varied widely, reflecting architectural styles and cultural priorities. Doors built on an impressive scale, often towering over their modern counterparts, adorned buildings of all kinds, but these oversized entryways weren’t just for aesthetics. Here are some reasons historical doors tend to be so large.

Credit: imageBROKER.com/ Alamy Stock Photo 

Big Doors Represented Great Power and Influence

Large doors have long symbolized power, authority, and social hierarchy. In ancient civilizations including Mesopotamia, Egypt, and Rome, monumental doorways marked temples, palaces, and civic buildings, emphasizing their divine or political significance. The Ishtar Gate of Babylon, built in the sixth century BCE under King Nebuchadnezzar II, was a massive entryway adorned with glazed blue bricks and images of sacred animals. It served as both a protective barrier and a symbol of the city’s splendor. Similarly, Rome’s grand entrances, such as those of imperial forums and temples, reinforced the might of the empire. Medieval European cathedrals later adopted this tradition, using towering doors to inspire awe and humility.

A striking example is the set of bronze doors at the Basilica of St. John Lateran in Rome, originally part of the Curia Julia, the ancient Roman Senate House completed in 29 BCE. These massive doors were relocated to the Basilica of St. John Lateran in the late 17th century under Pope Alexander VII. Standing more than 25 feet tall, they reflect both the opulence of imperial Rome and the authority of the Catholic Church.

Every Oscar Best Picture Winner in History 

Author Michael Nordine
February 20, 2025

Love it?

The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences hands out 23 awards on Oscar night, one of which gets pride of place as the real star of the show: Best Picture. Studios spend millions of dollars on campaigns they hope will crown their nominee the winner, prognosticators spend 365 days a year trying to divine which movie will take home the top prize, and millions tune in to see what all the fuss is about.

The coveted award has had several official names since ending the first ceremony on May 16, 1929, including the Academy Award for Outstanding Picture and the Academy Award for Outstanding Production, and it took on its current moniker in 1962. The number of nominees increased from five to 10 in 2009, likely in response to complaints that the usual slate was too rarefied after popular favorites such as The Dark Knight and WALL-E failed to be nominated. The most recent winner is Christopher Nolan’s Oppenheimer, which took home a total of seven Academy Awards in addition to grossing $976 million at the box office — proof that commercial success and Oscar glory are far from mutually exclusive. Here, we look back at the film that won Best Picture every year in Oscar history.

Credit: MGM Studios/ Moviepix via Getty Images

1920s

1928: Wings (directed by William A. Wellman)

1929: The Broadway Melody (Harry Beaumont)

1930: All Quiet on the Western Front (Lewis Milestone)

6 Strange Things People Used To Do for Fun

Author Bennett Kleinman
February 13, 2025

Love it?

Long before Netflix, video games, or podcasts existed, people turned toward other hobbies for their personal amusement — some of which seem quite strange by modern standards. Entertainment-seekers of yesteryear would gather to witness the unwrapping of ancient mummies, or pack arenas to watch people walk in circles for hours on end. These odd historical pastimes offer a fascinating glimpse into how folks in the past enjoyed their free time. Let’s take a look at six truly strange ways people used to have fun.

Credit: North Wind Picture Archives/ Alamy Stock Photo

Mummy Unrollings

“Egyptomania” — a fascination with ancient Egyptian culture — swept across Europe in the 19th century, particularly in Victorian England, where people developed an obsession with mummies. It was even popular to attend events known as mummy unrollings, where actual corpses brought over from Egypt were unwrapped in the name of both science and morbid amusement.

In the middle of the 18th century, brothers and anatomists John and William Hunter were among the first to unroll mummies, doing so in the name of science. But the practice transitioned into more of a spectacle under enthusiasts such as “the Great Belzoni,” an explorer and showman who specialized in Egyptian antiquities, and Thomas “Mummy” Pettigrew, an English surgeon who was drawn to Egyptian antiquities. Pettigrew hosted private parties where he unwrapped and performed autopsies on mummies, revealing various amulets or bits of preserved hair and skin to the delight of those in attendance. 

The trend really took off after the U.K. passed the 1832 Anatomy Act, which legally permitted doctors to dissect bodies for study. These mummy unrollings attracted large crowds, and were held at hospitals, scientific research centers, and private homes. The pastime remained popular for several decades, though ultimately lost its luster by the time Pettigrew died in 1865. Mummy unrollings continued, albeit on a smaller scale, with the last recorded event occurring in 1908. 

Did People in Ancient Rome Really Wear Togas?

Author Kristina Wright
February 13, 2025

Love it?

When we think of ancient Rome, we often think of the toga, generally depicted as a flowing white garment arranged in folds around the body and typically worn over a tunic by senators, philosophers, and citizens in grand marble forums. It’s an image that has persisted for thousands of years and has been reinforced in mythology and history. In the epic poem “Aeneid,” the Roman poet Virgil refers to Romans as “masters of the world, and people of the toga.” And in Roman folklore, Romulus — the founder of Rome — is depicted wearing a toga.

To ancient Romans, the toga represented a symbol of citizenship, status, and identity — and not everyone was entitled to wear it. The evolution of the garment spans centuries and came to symbolize Roman culture and values. As Rome changed, so did its fashion, but the toga remains a lasting image of a civilization that shaped the Western world.

Credit: Heritage Images/ Hulton Archive via Getty Images 

Romans Weren’t the First To Wear Togas

While the toga is quintessentially Roman, similar garments existed in other ancient cultures. The Greeks wore the himation, a large rectangular cloth draped over the body like a cloak. While less structured than the toga, it also served as a marker of status and decorum. The Etruscans, another ancient Italian society whose culture greatly influenced the Romans, wore the tebenna, a garment resembling the toga that didn’t carry any particular symbolic associations.

What set the Roman toga apart was its evolution into a distinctly Roman symbol. The toga became a visual marker of Roman citizenship, distinguishing Romans from the diverse peoples they ruled, and remained a symbol of Rome long after it fell out of fashion. Roman dress borrowed and incorporated elements from other cultures in the empire, resulting in a variety of toga styles and colors over the centuries that reflected the diversity of the Roman Empire.