Author: megneal

The Gift the Inventor of Mother's Day Wanted You To Give

6 Things Seniors Should Know About Travel Insurance Before Their Next Trip

Why Planting Flowers Can Help More Than Your Garden

8 Paws-itively Fascinating Facts About Man’s Best Friend

Credit: Universal History Archive/ Universal Images Group via Getty Images

Midday

By late morning, the farmer was busy in the fields. Whether plowing, sowing, or harvesting, they often sang songs or worked alongside the rest of the family, making the long hours a bit more bearable. Animals were fed, irrigation channels were checked, and grain was carefully stored for the future. The work was physically demanding, with little time for breaks, except perhaps a short midday rest and a quick snack.

Meanwhile, the pharaoh’s day was generally filled with matters of state. They met with high-ranking officials, reviewed reports from distant provinces, and made important decisions about military strategies, construction projects, or new decrees — decisions that scribes quickly recorded. The pharaoh was seen as a living god, and as such their duties were deeply connected to religion. They often visited temples or oversaw grand state ceremonies, all designed to maintain ma’at — the divine balance that kept the universe in harmony.

The scribe’s midday looked a bit different. Sitting cross-legged with a papyrus scroll on their lap, they might have copied tax records, written land deeds, or transcribed religious texts, using reed pens and ink. In addition to their writing tasks, they might have overseen operations at a grain warehouse, checked inventories, or accompanied inspectors to ensure tax compliance in the nearby villages.

Afternoon

As the afternoon sun climbed higher, the farmer pressed on with their work. They might have reinforced irrigation dikes, tended to livestock, or gathered reeds (to make baskets or mats) or papyrus (to make paper) along the Nile. The river shaped every part of their world — its annual flooding, known as inundation, could wash away homes, but it also left behind rich, fertile soil that made farming possible. During the months when fields were underwater, many farmers were called to help with state projects such as digging canals or even working on temple construction.

The scribe’s afternoon sometimes took them away from their writing board and out into the field. They often accompanied officials to survey land, checked on tax records, and delivered documents between government offices. Scribes were responsible for various administrative tasks, including recording census data, managing tax records, and drafting legal documents.

Scribes didn’t live in luxury, but their education offered them a level of stability and social status that few others had. Even with long hours and modest pay, the role came with opportunity — scribes could ascend the ranks of bureaucracy, with some rising to prominent positions such as vizier (a high-ranking political official) or even pharaoh, such as Horemheb in the 14th century BCE.

Meanwhile, the pharaoh’s duties extended into the afternoon with ceremonies, council meetings, or visits to key sites. Their duties included touring construction projects, presiding over temple rituals, and meeting with diplomats bearing gifts and tributes. Even when they weren’t issuing decrees or overseeing matters of state, their presence carried symbolic weight — every move reinforcing their divine role in maintaining harmony across the land.

Evening

As evening settled over Egypt, the pace of daily life slowed. The farmer returned to their mud-brick home, tired from the day’s labor, and often sat down to a simple meal with the family — lentils, flatbread, vegetables, and, if they were fortunate, some fish or duck. The evening hours were quiet, filled with conversation, stories, and a bit of rest before the cycle began again at dawn.

The scribe’s work came with some comforts, but their schedule was still shaped by the responsibilities of recordkeeping and administration. They ended their long work day by cleaning their tools and putting away scrolls. At home in their apartment complex near the mortuary or temple, they might have dined on a dinner of vegetables, bread, meat, and beer and then spend time reading, writing, or relaxing with music and family.

Even with the privileges of royalty, the pharaoh’s day often followed a similar rhythm of tradition, ceremony, and decision-making. At the vibrantly decorated palace, the ruler’s dinner was an elaborate affair, prepared by a team of cooks and often served alongside music and entertainment. Afterward, they sometimes meet with priests or advisers, or simply wound down in private quarters for the night.

What Grocery Stores Used To Look Like

1890s general store — Credit: Bettmann via Getty Images

Author Timothy Ott

July 16, 2026

Love it?122

Since most of us walk into a grocery store with our minds fixated on the items needed to fill up the fridge and pantry, it’s rare that we take the time to marvel at the wonders of modern food shopping. Whether it’s a small neighborhood mart, a chain supermarket, or a gargantuan superstore, today’s grocery stores offer a dizzying range of brands for any given product, allowing discerning shoppers to make a choice based on price, ingredients, or even packaging. All necessary (and unnecessary items) can be wheeled in a cart to a checkout line, where a friendly employee will happily tabulate the items and accept various forms of payment. There are also self-checkout stations, where you can scan your items yourself and be on your way even faster.

Of course, such a process would have been completely alien to early humans who relied on hunting and gathering their food. And it likely would be fairly shocking even to the people accustomed to earlier forms of food shopping. Here’s a look at what grocery stores were like before the rise of Publix, Whole Foods, Trader Joe’s, and the other popular stores we frequent today.

Credit: Heritage Image Partnership Ltd/ Alamy Stock Photo

Country and General Stores

According to Michael Ruhlman’s book Grocery: The Buying and Selling of Food in America, the earliest grocery depots in the U.S. were the country stores that surfaced in the 17th century. Along with offering a limited supply of culinary staples such as sugar, flour, and molasses, these markets provided a smorgasbord of other necessities of colonial America, including hardware, soap, dishes, pots, saddles, harnesses, shoes, and medicine. By the early 19th century, these stores — originally constructed from logs and mud — were largely replaced by newer frame buildings, which contained cellars that were large enough to house casks of whale oil and also cool enough to store eggs, butter, and cheese.

By the middle of the 19th century, the general store was a common sight across the small towns of the expanding United States. Similar to the country store, general stores stocked goods that both satiated hunger and catered to other crucial needs of paying customers. Food items included coffee beans, spices, honey, oatmeal, and dried beans, many of which were kept in barrels and required measuring the desired amount on (often inaccurate) scales. The stores also offered nonedible wares, including cloth, buttons, undergarments, hats, lamps, rifles, and ammunition.

Normally featuring at least one large display window, these stores were typically packed with goods piled high on shelves and tables amid the boxes and barrels stuffed into available spaces. A front counter displayed smaller items as well as such contraptions as a coffee grinder, scales, and the cash register. As general stores typically doubled as community centers, they were usually fitted with a stove to warm inhabitants during cold-weather months and often featured chairs for those who planned to stay and chat.

Even so, general stores were neither the most comfortable nor the most sanitary places. Customers often dragged in dirt and animal waste from the unpaved roads outside, while cast-iron stoves could produce a layer of soot over the displayed wares.

Sponsored Content

The Gift the Inventor of Mother's Day Wanted You To Give

6 Things Seniors Should Know About Travel Insurance Before Their Next Trip

Why Planting Flowers Can Help More Than Your Garden

8 Paws-itively Fascinating Facts About Man’s Best Friend

Early Grocery Stores

Although the term "grocery" referred to a tavern or a saloon through much of America's early history, it came to signify the emporiums that were appearing in more densely populated urban centers by the late 19th century.

These grocery stores typically carried around 200 products, and occupied 500 to 600 square feet of floor space. As with general stores, these shops featured items piled high on shelves, with clerks reaching for everything presented to them on a list and continuing to measure out both liquid and solid goods from barrels.

Although most proprietors were willing to offer a line of credit, a precursor to today’s credit cards, unlike today they provided limited choices by stocking only one type of each product. Also unlike most modern grocery stores, these early shops largely sold dry goods, meaning customers typically needed to make separate trips to a butcher, bakery, and produce peddler to round out the full array of dining needs.

Credit: Library of Congress/ Corbis Historical via Getty Images

A&P, Piggly Wiggly, and the Rise of Chain Stores

The grocery model began to change when the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, owners of the A&P grocery chain, opened the first of its "economy stores" in 1912. Along with eliminating the credit lines and free delivery offered by independent retailers, A&P stores became known for offering popular brands such as Eight O'Clock Coffee.

The Tennessee-based Piggly Wiggly chain introduced additional innovations to the model with the opening of its first store in 1916. Most groundbreaking was its procedure of "self service." While goods still lined the lone aisle that snaked through the store, they were now within reach of customers who picked out the price-marked items themselves instead of delegating the responsibility to a clerk. The customers then placed the item in a wood basket — also a novel feature — before bringing everything to a checkout counter.

The streamlined processes resulted in lower costs for customers, and in turn produced an explosion in sales for retailers. The number of grocery chain stores increased from 24,000 to around 200,000 between 1914 and 1930, with the biggest, A&P, accounting for 16,000 of those outlets.

Credit: University of Southern California/ Corbis Historical via Getty Images

The First Supermarkets Appeared in the 1930s

Although the 1920s saw the rise of "combination stores" that provided a wider range of meats, produce, and dairy products under one roof, the first true supermarket arrived with the opening of New York City's King Kullen in 1930.

A former employee of the Kroger chain stores, Matt Cullen decided to launch his new enterprise in a slightly more remote section of Jamaica, Queens. The location allowed for cheaper real estate, which meant that Cullen could open a larger store and provide space for the machines that were transforming American lives: automobiles.

The first King Kullen covered 6,000 square feet and offered 10 times the amount of food products as most existing markets, much of which was sold out of packing crates. It was soon surpassed by New Jersey's Big Bear, which featured a 15,000-square-foot grocery surrounded by areas leased to vendors selling tobacco, cosmetics, and auto parts.

Although other features of the contemporary shopping experience had yet to be invented — shopping carts arrived in the late 1930s, the barcode system in the 1970s — the blueprint for the modern grocery store was in place, with supermarkets eventually expanding to stock 50,000 items, and colossal chains swelling to a footprint of more than 200,000 square feet.

Nowadays, as we casually stroll down the block-length aisles of superstores beneath towering shelves of colorful boxes, examine the fine print on packages in the organic section, or nibble on the free samples of cheese and dumplings, we can spare a thought for the evolution of this essential part of everyday life.

Why Do We Mostly Eat Chicken Eggs?

Author Kristina Wright

July 16, 2026

Love it?41

When we say we’re buying eggs at the grocery store or having eggs for breakfast, we’re almost always talking about one specific kind: chicken eggs. The average American eats more than 270 chicken eggs each year, making them one of the most common foods in the modern diet. They’re so familiar that it’s easy to forget they represent just one option.

Chickens aren’t the only birds that lay edible eggs. Ducks, geese, quail, turkeys, and even ostriches produce eggs that people eat regularly in parts of the world, albeit on a much smaller scale. So why do chickens dominate the global egg market?

Credit: © Jim Heimann Collection—Archive Photos/Getty Images

Eggs Were Always on the Menu

For most of human history, people weren’t especially selective about where their eggs came from. Ancient Romans consumed eggs from ducks, geese, partridges, pheasants, and even peacocks, while coastal communities around the world harvested eggs from nesting seabirds such as gulls, puffins, murres, and terns. If an egg was nutritious, accessible, and safe to collect, it usually ended up on the menu.

That diversity hasn’t entirely disappeared. Duck eggs remain popular throughout much of Asia, particularly in Chinese and Vietnamese cuisine, where they are valued for their richer flavor and larger yolks. Quail eggs appear in dishes across Europe, Latin America, and East Asia, while goose eggs are still enjoyed seasonally in parts of Northern and Eastern Europe.

For thousands of years, people generally ate whatever eggs were locally available, but the rise of the chicken gradually changed that equation. And, compared with almost every other domesticated bird, chickens have an unusually favorable combination of traits for large-scale egg production.

Sponsored Content

The Gift the Inventor of Mother's Day Wanted You To Give

6 Things Seniors Should Know About Travel Insurance Before Their Next Trip

Why Planting Flowers Can Help More Than Your Garden

8 Paws-itively Fascinating Facts About Man’s Best Friend

Credit: © Sepia Times—Universal Images Group/Getty Images

Why Chickens Stood Out

Humans first domesticated chickens at least 3,500 years ago from wild red junglefowl in Southeast Asia. Many researchers believe those junglefowl were initially attracted to early rice and millet fields, where spilled grain and insects created an easy food source near human settlements. Over time, that close association evolved into domestication. Archaeological evidence suggests chickens spread westward through trade routes into India, the Middle East, Europe, and eventually Africa, long before reaching the Americas with European explorers.

Selective breeding transformed the species dramatically. Wild junglefowl typically lay only around 10 to 15 eggs per year during a short breeding season, primarily in spring. But over centuries, farmers consistently favored birds that laid eggs more frequently, matured earlier, and tolerated living near humans. The result was a gradual but dramatic increase in productivity.

By the early 20th century, advances in genetics, nutrition, and animal husbandry accelerated that process even further. Annual egg production per hen in the United States rose dramatically over the following decades as farmers bred birds specifically for productivity and efficiency. Other domesticated birds never received the same level of investment or specialization for egg production, leaving chickens with an enormous head start before industrial farming even began.

Credit: © Charles CICCIONE–Gamma-Rapho/Getty Images

The Economics of Eggs

Modern laying hens are extraordinarily productive animals, with commercial breeds commonly producing around 280 to 320 eggs per year. By comparison, geese typically lay only around 30 to 50 eggs annually and turkeys generally produce between 70 and 100 eggs a year. Ducks come closest to competing with chickens in productivity, but even they usually require more feed, more water, and more space to maintain consistent laying rates.

Chicken eggs also occupy a useful middle ground in size. Quail eggs are so small that it takes four or five to equal a single chicken egg, while goose eggs are often two to three times larger and less practical for everyday cooking and baking.

Meanwhile, chickens are relatively inexpensive to raise. They adapt well to a wide range of climates, require less space and feed than larger birds, and mature quickly, with many hens beginning to lay at around 5 months of age. From a farmer’s perspective, chickens deliver an unusually high number of eggs for relatively modest inputs — a combination that few other domesticated birds can match.

Credit: © Irving Browning—The New York Historical/Getty Images

The Supermarket Standard

By the early 20th century, the chicken had become the dominant commercial egg-laying bird across much of the industrialized world. The rise of supermarkets and large-scale food distribution only reinforced that advantage. Retailers favored products that could be graded, packaged, shipped long distances, and sold with consistent expectations about size, appearance, and shelf life. Chicken eggs were particularly well suited to that system.

Recipes standardized around chicken eggs as well. Cookbooks, commercial bakeries, and food manufacturers all assumed a particular egg size and a predictable balance of yolk and white. Other eggs could certainly be substituted, but they often required adjustments that made them less convenient for large-scale production and recipes.

Alternative eggs never disappeared. Duck eggs remain popular for baking, quail eggs appear in cuisines around the world, and goose eggs are still enjoyed seasonally in some regions. But for everyday breakfasts, omelets, and baking projects, chicken eggs became the default, so much so that they’re practically synonymous with eating “eggs” today.

The Rise and Fall of Tupperware Parties

Tupperware party ad, 1960s — Credit: © Science & Society Picture Library—SSPL/Getty Images

Author Kristina Wright

July 16, 2026

Love it?106

You might remember your mother or grandmother hosting a Tupperware party in the living room, with neighbors gathered around, sipping coffee and nibbling on dessert while someone demonstrated the magic of an airtight seal. Or maybe you still have a few pastel bowls of your own tucked away in a kitchen cabinet — gathering dust, and in some cases, vintage value.

For several decades in the mid-20th century, Tupperware parties were a cultural phenomenon that successfully blended shopping and socializing. Today, the idea of gathering friends to watch demonstrations of plastic bowls and storage containers feels like a relic from another time. Yet Tupperware parties remain a powerful symbol of postwar suburban life, when neighborhood gatherings and face-to-face connections were simply part of everyday life.

Credit: © John Greim—LightRocket/Getty Images

An Airtight Invention

The history of Tupperware begins in the 1940s with inventor Earl Tupper, who developed lightweight, durable plastic containers using leftover polyethylene from wartime manufacturing. At a time when leftovers were typically stored in glass containers, wrapped in wax paper, or covered with aluminum foil, his products offered something genuinely new. They were reusable, relatively unbreakable, and featured flexible airtight seals that kept food fresher for longer.

There was just one problem: People didn’t understand how to use them. The famous burping seal that made Tupperware so effective required a specific technique to close properly. When the products appeared on department store shelves, shoppers often overlooked them or failed to appreciate their advantages. Some consumers who took a chance on them ultimately returned them to the store because they didn’t think the lids fit. Sales lagged despite the innovation behind the design.

Sponsored Content

The Gift the Inventor of Mother's Day Wanted You To Give

6 Things Seniors Should Know About Travel Insurance Before Their Next Trip

Why Planting Flowers Can Help More Than Your Garden

8 Paws-itively Fascinating Facts About Man’s Best Friend

Credit: Archives Center at the National Museum of American History

The Tupperware Party Is Born

Everything changed when saleswoman Brownie Wise entered the picture. Wise and her mother had already found success selling household products through their direct-selling venture Patio Parties and recognized that home demonstrations were the most effective way to market Tupperware. Instead of sitting on store shelves, the containers were brought directly into people’s homes, where customers could watch demonstrations, ask questions, and handle the products themselves.

The format made the products far easier to understand and more appealing — guests could see the containers in use rather than read about them on packaging. Wise’s success led Earl Tupper to appoint her vice president of Tupperware Home Parties, where she scaled the hostess-party model into a nationwide sales network.

The approach proved extraordinarily effective. By 1954, roughly 20,000 people were involved in Tupperware’s sales system as dealers, distributors, and managers, all supporting its rapidly growing direct-sales operation. That same year, Tupperware sales reached $25 million — equivalent to roughly $310 million in 2026 dollars.

Credit: © Hulton Archive—Archive Photos/Getty Images

Where Shopping Met Socializing

For many suburban homemakers in the 1950s and 1960s, Tupperware parties were as much social events as sales presentations. A host would invite friends, neighbors, and relatives into their home for refreshments and a product demonstration, and a Tupperware representative would showcase the latest containers, kitchen tools, and serving pieces, using games and giveaways to keep the atmosphere lively. At a time when many women were home managing households, these gatherings offered a regular chance to connect outside church groups or school activities — blending shopping and socializing long before social media existed.

The model also came with financial incentives. Hosts earned free products based on sales, encouraging them to invite more guests, while independent consultants earned income by hosting parties and building networks of additional sellers. For some women, this created one of the few flexible ways to earn money while balancing family responsibilities. Brownie Wise herself became one of the first female business executives to gain national recognition in postwar America.

Peak Tupperware

By the 1960s and 1970s, Tupperware parties were firmly embedded in suburban American life. Kitchens filled with pastel pinks, mint greens, and baby blues gave way to the bold earth tones of the 1970s, such as avocado green, harvest gold, and burnt orange.

After being spun off as an independent public company in 1996, following decades under its corporate parent Premark, Tupperware actively expanded overseas. By then, its direct-selling system — built entirely around independent consultants rather than retail stores — had reached almost 100 countries worldwide.

The company’s financial peak came in 2013, when sales revenue hit $2.67 billion. By then, the party-plan model it popularized had already reshaped retail culture, inspiring a wave of home-based selling across categories from clothing to cookware, and turning Tupperware parties into one of the most recognizable symbols of consumer life.

Credit: © James Gilmour—Fairfax Media Archives/Getty Images

The Party Ends

Several cultural shifts gradually eroded the model that had made Tupperware parties so successful. As more women entered the full-time workforce, it became harder to host or attend sales parties, and the social role these gatherings once filled diminished as workplaces and other activities expanded social networks.

At the same time, shopping habits shifted toward convenience. Big-box stores, shopping malls, and eventually online retailers made it easier to buy similar products quickly and directly, without spending an evening at a sales demonstration. Competition also intensified after Tupperware’s patents expired in the 1980s. Food storage containers from multiple manufacturers soon filled retail shelves as airtight plastic storage became a standard household item rather than a novelty.

Although the classic home party has largely faded, Tupperware itself did not disappear. From the 1990s onward, the company gradually supplemented its traditional party-plan model with catalog and direct-mail marketing before moving into digital catalogs and early online ordering in the late 1990s and 2000s. By the 2010s, social media and virtual parties had become a growing part of its sales approach, even as physical gatherings declined.

After years of declining sales and mounting debt, Tupperware Brands filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the United States in 2024 as part of a restructuring effort aimed at stabilizing its operations. Despite its financial difficulties, the brand remains deeply embedded in consumer culture — many people still use “Tupperware” as a generic term for any plastic food container, regardless of who made it.

Why Are Men’s and Women’s Buttons on Opposite Sides?

Classic button-up shirt — Credit: Angelo DeVal - Fashion and Clothing/ Alamy Stock Photo

Author Tony Dunnell

July 16, 2026

Love it?135

If you’ve ever tried putting on a shirt that was designed for someone of the opposite gender, you may have noticed something peculiar: The buttons are on the “wrong” side. Men’s shirts button left over right, with buttons running down the right side and buttonholes on the left. Women’s shirts do the opposite, buttoning right over left.

Before the rise of buttons, garments were typically laced together or fastened with brooches or clasps. Buttoned closures for garments became prevalent in the 13th century with the advent of the reinforced buttonhole — and the two opposing button configurations for men and women have existed for centuries. But why? Here’s a look at some of the theories behind this long-standing design choice.

Buttons and Battle

Historians don’t know for sure why men’s and women’s buttons are on opposite sides, but some of the most common explanations involve military considerations. According to the authors of The Art of Chivalry: European Arms and Armor From the Metropolitan Museum of Art, medieval breastplates were formed of two separate and overlapping plates. To ensure that an enemy’s lance point would not slip between the plates, they were pieced together with the left plate overlapping the right, “since it was standard fighting practice that the left side, protected by the shield, was turned toward the enemy,” the authors point out. For this reason, they argue, “men’s jackets button left to right even to the present day.”

Others have made similar observations. Due to the predominance of right-handedness (about 90% of humans are right-handed), swords were typically worn on the left side, so they could be drawn with the dominant right hand. According to Paul Keers in A Gentleman’s Wardrobe, men’s shirts and jackets were deliberately designed to button left over right “to avoid catching the pommel of one’s sword in the opening, when drawing it right-handed.”

From avoiding the piercing blows of lance tips to smoothly drawing weapons, there is some logic to the soldierly need for buttoning left over right. But there’s no definitive evidence to support these military theories — and while they might explain the need for buttons on the right, they don’t supply any answers as to why women’s buttons are on the opposite side.

Sponsored Content

The Gift the Inventor of Mother's Day Wanted You To Give

6 Things Seniors Should Know About Travel Insurance Before Their Next Trip

Why Planting Flowers Can Help More Than Your Garden

8 Paws-itively Fascinating Facts About Man’s Best Friend

Medieval Clothing

Arguably the most plausible explanation goes back to when buttons first became fashionable in Europe during the 13th and 14th centuries. At that time, they were often made from expensive materials such as gold, silver, and ivory, and were an indicator of status and wealth. Women’s clothing in particular could be highly elaborate, consisting of multiple garments such as petticoats, bloomers, gowns, corsets, and bustles.

Wealthy women with complex clothes often didn’t dress themselves and instead relied on the help of maids. So, when it came to buttons, the angle of attack was reversed. Men benefited from having buttons on the right side because they typically dressed themselves and people are predominantly right-handed. But when someone is dressing another person who’s facing them, the orientation is reversed. Clothing designers, therefore, crafted their outfits to be buttoned up by the hired help, with their high-society clients in mind. The trend then filtered down, becoming standard in women’s fashion and establishing a convention that persists today.

Credit: incamerastock/ Alamy Stock Photo

Breastfeeding, Horses, and Napoleon

Other theories exist, albeit of varying levels of plausibility. One involves the act of breastfeeding. Due to right-hand dominance, women tend to hold their infants in their left arm to keep their right arm relatively free. So, the theory posits, a shirt with the buttons on the left makes it easier for mothers to unbutton using their right hand, while providing slightly easier access. A second theory involves horseback riding and the once-common practice of women riding sidesaddle, which typically involved having both legs on the horse’s left side. By putting women’s shirt and dress buttons on the left, the amount of breeze entering their clothing would be reduced while the rider was trotting along.

Neither theory is particularly convincing, but both are more plausible than blaming the whole thing on Napoleon Bonaparte. Portraits of Napoleon often show the French general and later emperor with one hand tucked into his shirt or waistcoat. This pose was strangely common during the 18th and 19th centuries, when it was considered to demonstrate a kind of calm boldness. According to one button theory, women used to mock the emperor by mimicking his hand-in-waistcoat pose. In response, Napoleon ordered that all women’s shirts be buttoned on the opposite side of men’s to end any mockery at his expense. This fanciful theory seems to have gained at least some traction but is almost certainly apocryphal, as there is seemingly no supporting evidence and button placement conventions predate Napoleon’s era.

7 Common Last Names That Are Linked to Nobility

King Edward IV — Credit: Classic Image/ Alamy Stock Photo

Author Tony Dunnell

July 16, 2026

Love it?114

Have you ever wondered if your last name might have royal connections? Whether, through the centuries, your surname has traveled through the noble bloodlines of ancient empires and medieval kingdoms? Today, with genealogy websites and online surname databases, it’s easier than ever to trace a name’s history. But while millions of people around the world might be carrying monikers that once graced the halls of power, they often do so without realizing any potentially regal heritage.

Sometimes, the connection might seem obvious — if your last name is Tudor, Windsor, Habsburg, or Plantagenet, it’s not unreasonable to consider a royal connection. But those aren’t the only surnames with links to the kings and queens of yore. Here are seven common last names in the U.S. that may suggest a royal — or at least noble — lineage.

York

The name York is of Anglo-Saxon origin, and it’s a relatively common last name in the United States. It comes from the historic county of Yorkshire in northern England, which in turn gave its name to the House of York, a royal dynasty that provided three kings of England in the 15th century. The house was a cadet branch (a junior line of a noble, royal, or otherwise powerful family) of the House of Plantagenet. The House of Lancaster was also a cadet branch of the Plantagenets, and the two houses fought against each other in the Wars of the Roses. Lancaster is a moderately common surname in the United States.

Sponsored Content

The Gift the Inventor of Mother's Day Wanted You To Give

6 Things Seniors Should Know About Travel Insurance Before Their Next Trip

Why Planting Flowers Can Help More Than Your Garden

8 Paws-itively Fascinating Facts About Man’s Best Friend

Credit: Bettmann Archive via Getty Images

Bruce

The Bruce family was an old Scottish family of Norman French descent (coming from Bruis or Brix in France), to which two kings of Scotland belonged — most notably Robert the Bruce, who freed Scotland from English rule in the 14th century. Today, the Bruce name remains prominent in Scotland and is also a relatively common surname in the U.S.

Howard

Some well-known American celebrities have the surname Howard, including Ron Howard, his daughter Bryce Dallas Howard, and the celebrated American soccer player Tim Howard. There’s a chance that they, like other Howards, might have a connection to the historic Howard family, a notable aristocratic English family whose head, the Duke of Norfolk, is the premier duke and hereditary earl marshal of England. It’s not quite royalty, but the surname’s extensive historical connection to the English monarchy is nothing to sneeze at.

Credit: Pictorial Press Ltd/ Alamy Stock Photo

Russell

In 2000, Russell was ranked the 93rd most popular surname in the United States. Today’s Russells might have a connection with one of the most influential aristocratic lineages in Britain. While not of royal blood, the historic Russell family has centuries of noble heritage with plenty of royal links. The family became prominent under the Tudor sovereigns, and the senior line has held the title of Duke of Bedford since 1694. Lord John Russell served as British prime minister twice in the mid-19th century — and his grandson was the philosopher Bertrand Russell.

Campbell

After rising to prominence toward the end of the 1200s, Clan Campbell went on to become arguably the most successful clan in Scottish history. Through staunch support of Robert the Bruce and later Stewart monarchs, the Campbell family developed significant and long-standing royal connections. In 1871, John Campbell, Marquess of Lorne, married Princess Louise, the sixth child of Queen Victoria, further cementing the Campbell family’s ties with royalty. According to the 2010 census, Campbell is the 47th most common surname in the United States today.

Credit: Pictures From History/ Universal Images Group via Getty Images

Nguyen

In Vietnam, as much as 40% of the country’s population has the surname Nguyen. This incredibly high percentage is likely due to the Vietnamese tradition of showing loyalty to a leader by taking that leader’s family name. The Nguyen dynasty, which ruled Vietnam from 1802 to 1945, was the very last Vietnamese dynasty, which largely accounts for the surname’s extreme popularity in Vietnam. In the U.S., an estimated 2.3 million people identified as Vietnamese as of 2023, which helps explain why Nguyen is the 38th most-common surname in America. So, anyone with the last name Nguyen is linked, at least in name, with the Nguyen dynasty — although the chances of a direct bloodline are slim.

Spencer

The surname Spencer has been in use since at least the mid-13th century. It comes from the word “dispenser,” meaning “steward” — which in itself can be a court title or position. Then there’s the Spencer family, which was elevated to the English nobility by James I in 1603. Since then, there have been many lords, ladies, and earls from the Spencer line, and the family frequently moved in royal circles. Georgiana Spencer, Duchess of Devonshire (1757–1806) had an informal but influential role advising King George IV, and also developed a friendship with the Queen of France, Marie Antoinette. Two of the most prominent figures of the 20th century also came from the Spencer family tree: Winston Churchill and Diana, Princess of Wales, the first Spencer to marry directly into the royal family.

School Rules From the Past That Would Shock You Today

Cold War “duck and cover” drill — Credit: © GHI/Universal History Archive—Universal Images Group/Getty Images

Author Kristina Wright

July 14, 2026

Love it?71

If you dropped into a typical classroom today, you’d likely see flexible seating, group work, and active discussions between students and teachers. Compared to even a few decades ago, the contrast is striking. Many practices that are now considered outdated — or even unacceptable — were once routine parts of school life.

For much of the 19th and 20th centuries, schools emphasized discipline, conformity, and respect for authority. Students followed detailed rules governing everything from classroom behavior and personal appearance to handwriting and social conduct. In many institutions, especially private and religious schools, daily routines were tightly structured, and individuality often took a back seat to order and uniformity.

Here are some of the most surprising school rules and traditions that were once considered perfectly normal in public and private schools in the West.

Credit: © Heritage Images—Hulton Archive/Getty Images

Silence and Strict Classroom Obedience

Many classrooms from the 19th century through the mid-20th century were structured around control of attention, movement, and speech. The physical setup itself reinforced this: Students sat in fixed rows facing forward, with the teacher positioned as the central authority at the front of the room. Lessons were designed for collective focus rather than interaction, and total obedience was demanded.

Discussion was not typically a part of the classroom experience, and children were taught to speak only when spoken to. Students were expected to raise their hand and wait to be called on, and were often required to stand when addressing the teacher. Instruction relied heavily on memorization, repetition, and group recitation, where entire classes would respond in unison.

Sponsored Content

The Gift the Inventor of Mother's Day Wanted You To Give

6 Things Seniors Should Know About Travel Insurance Before Their Next Trip

Why Planting Flowers Can Help More Than Your Garden

8 Paws-itively Fascinating Facts About Man’s Best Friend

Credit: © Kirn Vintage Stock—Corbis Historical/Getty Images

Corporal Punishment as Standard Discipline

Alongside this structured classroom order, many schools across the U.S., U.K., Canada, and Australia applied corporal punishment as a formal disciplinary tool well into the late 20th century. Teachers and principals used paddles, straps, or canes for infractions that might seem minor today, including talking in class and incomplete work. In some systems, physical punishment escalated from earlier steps such as warnings or written penalties, with physical discipline reserved as a “last resort.” Private and religious schools often maintained these practices longer and with fewer procedural restrictions.

Punishment was routine and highly visible, sometimes occurring within earshot or sight of other students, reinforcing the authority structure of the school. While now banned or heavily restricted across most Western education systems, corporal punishment remains one of the clearest examples of how disciplinary approaches in schools have fundamentally changed.

Credit: © Keystone-France—Gamma-Keystone/Getty Images

Left-Handed Students Were Forced To Switch Writing Hands

Across many school systems in Europe, North America, Australia, and other regions from the late 19th century through much of the 20th century, left-handed students were often required to write with their right hand instead. Left-handedness was frequently viewed as something that needed to be corrected, particularly in the context of handwriting instruction, where uniform penmanship was considered an important part of schooling.

Teachers commonly enforced this expectation by retraining left-handed students to use their right hand. This could include physically repositioning a student’s hand, repeatedly correcting grip and posture, or requiring extensive practice using the right hand until the habit changed. Some students underwent this correction over months or even years of instruction, especially in early primary education where handwriting drills were a daily part of classroom routines. The practice gradually declined in the second half of the 20th century as educational research increasingly recognized left-handedness as a natural variation rather than a behavior requiring correction.

Credit: © Frederick Bradley—Underwood Archives/Getty Images

Strict Dress and Grooming Codes

Across many public and private schools in the U.S. and U.K. from the 1920s through the 1970s, student appearance was governed by detailed dress and grooming codes. For girls, pants were often prohibited and skirt length was among the most closely enforced rules. Teachers and administrators sometimes checked skirts during morning inspections or at classroom doors, and some schools used yardsticks or other methods to ensure hemlines met regulations.

Girls also faced restrictions on makeup, jewelry, and hairstyles, while boys were expected to maintain short hair and a neat appearance. As longer hairstyles became associated with youth counterculture during the 1960s, many schools adopted strict “above-the-collar” hair regulations, and students could be disciplined for failing to comply. Facial hair was commonly prohibited, and some schools conducted routine inspections to ensure all students met appearance standards. Today, while many schools still implement dress codes, particularly rigid rules typically face significant public scrutiny and debate.

Credit: © London Metropolitan Archives—Heritage Images/Getty Images

Gender-Separated Classes

For much of the 20th century, schools commonly separated boys and girls for certain subjects, particularly physical education. Boys were typically assigned to competitive sports, strength training, and endurance activities, while girls participated in programs focused on grace and flexibility, such as dance and gymnastics.

The division extended beyond P.E. Girls were typically required to take home economics courses that taught cooking, sewing, childcare, budgeting, and household management, while boys were directed into shop or industrial arts classes covering woodworking, metalworking, drafting, and mechanical repair. These courses were frequently mandatory and reflected prevailing assumptions about the different roles men and women would occupy in adulthood.

Beginning in the 1970s, these practices faced growing scrutiny. A major turning point came with the passage of Title IX in 1972, a federal law prohibiting gender-based discrimination in federally funded education programs. While implementation took time, the law contributed to the gradual decline of many school policies that assigned classes and activities according to gender.

Cold War “Duck and Cover” Nuclear Drills

During the height of Cold War tensions in the 1950s and early 1960s, civil defense training became a routine part of school life in the United States and some allied countries. Among the most recognizable practices were “duck and cover” drills, which prepared students for the possibility of a nuclear attack. When an alarm sounded, students were instructed to drop beneath their desks, crouch against interior walls, and cover their heads and necks.

Schools often reinforced the lessons with government-produced instructional films that taught children how to respond calmly during an atomic explosion. Some districts also designated hallways, basements, or specially marked areas as fallout shelters, and students practiced moving to these locations as part of emergency preparedness exercises. For a generation of students, preparing for a potential nuclear attack was considered a normal part of the school day.

Credit: © Evening Standard—Hulton Archive/Getty Images

High School Smoking Areas

Although policies varied widely by region and school, structured smoking areas for students were once a recognizable — and normalized — feature of secondary education. From the 1950s through the 1980s, many high schools in North America and parts of Europe maintained designated smoking areas for older students. Teen smoking rates were significantly higher during this period, and tobacco use was far more socially accepted, with many students beginning the habit in early adolescence.

Smoking zones were usually placed outdoors in courtyards, side yards, or designated areas behind school buildings. In some schools, staff supervised these spaces, while in others they operated with minimal oversight as long as students remained within boundaries during allowed times. Students who smoked outside designated areas could face punishment, but within the assigned zones the behavior was formally permitted under school rules — a sure sign of a very different era in education.

What American Bedrooms Looked Like 100 Years Ago

Bedroom with two beds — Credit: © Keith Beaty—Toronto Star/Getty Images

Author Kristina Wright

July 9, 2026

Love it?50

Step into an average American bedroom in the mid-1920s and you’d find a room caught between two eras. The traditions of the 19th century hadn’t completely disappeared, yet many of the conveniences associated with modern homes were only beginning to spread.

At the same time, Americans were placing greater importance on privacy, and bedrooms were becoming more clearly defined as personal spaces rather than multipurpose rooms used by the entire household.

As the place in the home where personal style and daily routines were formed, the bedroom was more than just a place to sleep. Looking at it now offers a glimpse into how people actually lived behind closed doors 100 years ago.

Credit: © The New York Historical—Archive Photos/Getty Images

Open Windows

If you walked into an American bedroom a century ago, chances are the windows would be open, even during chilly weather. Fresh air was widely believed to be essential for good health, and doctors, public health officials, and popular magazines regularly encouraged families to keep bedrooms well ventilated, enlisting slogans such as “Always sleep with the window open.” Part of this belief stemmed from concerns about tuberculosis and other respiratory illnesses. Many Americans viewed a stuffy bedroom as unhealthy, so open windows became a nightly routine in countless households.

This was true even though central heating was far from universal. Many homes relied on coal furnaces, wood stoves, or radiator systems that did not always keep bedrooms warm through the night. As a result, bedrooms were often cooler than the rest of the house during winter months. Families compensated with heavy quilts, wool blankets, and thick comforters rather than closing the windows. The fresh-air movement even inspired sleeping porches, screened outdoor spaces used for sleeping during warmer seasons.

Sponsored Content

The Gift the Inventor of Mother's Day Wanted You To Give

6 Things Seniors Should Know About Travel Insurance Before Their Next Trip

Why Planting Flowers Can Help More Than Your Garden

8 Paws-itively Fascinating Facts About Man’s Best Friend

Credit: © Wolfgang Weber—ullstein bild/Getty Images

Washstands

A century ago, many American bedrooms still contained a washstand — a piece of furniture designed to hold a water pitcher, washbasin, towels, and other grooming supplies. The washstand itself was the cabinet or table, while the basin was the bowl used for washing. For generations, these pieces were standard fixtures in American bedrooms, and they remained a familiar sight in many homes during the mid-1920s, even as indoor plumbing gradually became more common in cities and newer homes.

The transition to fully plumbed homes was slow and uneven. In 1940 — the earliest year for which comprehensive census data is available — only 55% of American homes had “complete plumbing facilities,” defined as hot and cold running water, a bathtub or shower, and a flush toilet. The figure would have been even lower in the mid-1920s. As a result, washstands continued to serve a practical purpose in older homes and rural households. Even in some homes with indoor plumbing, they remained in use out of habit or convenience, especially when a single bathroom served an entire family.

Credit: © ullstein bild Dtl./Getty Images

Tiny Closets

One of the biggest differences in the bedrooms of a century ago was the lack of closet space. Built-in closets had become increasingly common in American homes by the early 20th century, but they were usually small by modern standards, and many older houses had none at all. The spacious walk-in closet, now considered a staple of many primary bedrooms, did not become a common feature of American home design until the late 20th century. Without much built-in storage, more of the bedroom’s floor space was devoted to freestanding furniture.

Large dressers and chests of drawers were used to store folded clothing, while wardrobes and armoires provided space for garments that needed hanging. Trunks and cedar chests held seasonal items, extra blankets, and clothing for special occasions. Americans generally owned fewer clothes than they do today, and garments were expected to be worn for years, repaired when necessary, stored between seasons, and saved to be passed down to younger siblings or other family members.

Separate Beds

Separate beds for married couples had been promoted since the late 19th century, but the arrangement reached the height of its popularity during the 1920s and 1930s. Furniture manufacturers, doctors, and home design magazines often praised twin beds as cleaner, healthier, and more practical than a shared mattress. Sleeping apart was said to improve sleep, reduce disturbances from a restless partner, and even limit the spread of colds and other illnesses within the household.

Not every family embraced the idea, and many working-class couples continued sharing a bed simply because buying two was impractical or unnecessary. But among middle-class Americans, twin beds became common enough to define the look of many bedrooms for decades. The arrangement remained widely accepted through the 1940s and 1950s, but larger shared beds gradually regained popularity in the postwar years and eventually became the norm in American homes once again.

Credit: © Hawkins—Hulton Archive/Getty Images

Matching Furniture

Walk into a typical American bedroom in the 1920s, and one of the first things you’d notice was how closely the furniture matched. Rather than assembling a room piece by piece, many families aspired to own a coordinated bedroom suite of several matching pieces, including a bed, dresser, and chest of drawers. Furniture manufacturers had been heavily promoting these matching sets since the 1880s, and by the mid-1920s furniture companies were offering dozens of different bedroom suite designs to consumers.

Not every family could afford a complete suite, especially in rural areas or working-class households, but the trend was widespread enough to shape bedroom design across the country. At the same time, furniture styles were evolving. The dark, heavily carved pieces that had dominated many late-19th-century homes were gradually giving way to lighter designs, decorative veneers, mirrored vanities, and furniture influenced by fashionable styles such as art deco.

Vanities

Vanity tables, or dressing tables, had long been used in some form in households dating back centuries, particularly in wealthier homes where dedicated spaces for grooming were common. By the 1920s, however, the bedroom vanity had become a familiar feature in many middle-class American homes, too, as furniture manufacturers began producing them more widely and including them in coordinated bedroom suites. Typically consisting of a small table or desk with an attached mirror and matching bench or stool, the vanity provided a dedicated space for grooming and dressing.

The popularity of vanities also reflected broader cultural changes during the decade. The 1920s saw booming sales of cosmetics, perfumes, and other beauty products, as more women spent time in public life and were increasingly expected to maintain a polished appearance. New beauty standards — such as shorter hairstyles and more involved grooming routines — also made daily upkeep more routine and visible than in earlier decades.

While not every household could afford a dedicated dressing table, particularly in rural and working-class homes, the vanity became a common feature in many urban and middle-class bedrooms, and its popularity only began to decline in the mid-20th century as home design evolved and built-in bathroom storage became more common.

Why Old Houses Had Two Front Doors

House with two front doors — Credit: © DEA / W. BUSS—De Agostini/Getty Images

Author Tony Dunnell

July 9, 2026

Love it?47

If you take a walk through some of the older neighborhoods in the United States, you might spot a slightly odd configuration on some of the houses: two front doors sitting side by side on the same facade.

It’s easy to assume these homes must have been converted into duplexes at some point, with a door added — and that may well be the case in some instances. But many of these buildings were constructed right from the start as single-family homes with two front doors, sometime in the 18th or 19th century.

So why two entrances, right next to each other? It seems illogical today, but there are a few reasons that could explain this architectural quirk.

One for Guests, One for Family

One of the leading theories for why homes had two front doors concerns the social separation of formal and informal life within the household. In many houses of the 18th and 19th centuries, the interior was divided between a formal parlor kept neat and tidy for receiving guests, and the everyday living quarters of the family. Two front doors made practical sense in this context. One door opened into the formal area, serving as the primary entrance for guests and possibly tradespeople. The other door opened directly into the family’s private space for everyday use by those who actually lived there.

This two-door arrangement allowed a family to confine day-to-day activities to one part of the house, while leaving the formal areas largely untouched and ready to receive visitors. It also meant that guests could be shown directly into the parlor or dining room without passing through the more cluttered and possibly disorganized family areas, and without infringing upon the privacy of the entire family (or being subjected to unruly kids or grumpy grandparents).

Sponsored Content

The Gift the Inventor of Mother's Day Wanted You To Give

6 Things Seniors Should Know About Travel Insurance Before Their Next Trip

Why Planting Flowers Can Help More Than Your Garden

8 Paws-itively Fascinating Facts About Man’s Best Friend

Built-In Air Conditioning

In a world before air conditioning, managing temperature inside a house was an important daily effort, especially when old-fashioned stoves were being used inside. Having two front doors offered a practical advantage in warm weather. Keeping both doors open, particularly if one or both led to a long central corridor running the length of the house, could create a cross-breeze, drawing cooler air into the building.

This seems to be the case in the folk houses of Kentucky, where one front door opened onto the kitchen with its wood-burning stove, helping to keep the kitchen cool. And in some old houses, one of the two front doors might have opened directly into the master bedroom, helping to cool the space on hot nights.

Credit: © Kathleen Finlay—Connect Images/Getty Images

Coffin Doors, Newlyweds, and More

Many alternative theories exist to explain why some old houses have two front doors, but they often lack strong supporting evidence. Some suggest that one door is a so-called “coffin door,” reserved exclusively for funerals. But coffin doors, if they existed at all (the theory is questionable), would not typically have been placed right next to a second front door, and would more likely have been placed at the side of the house leading directly into a parlor or living room.

Other theories suggest that two doors were placed side by side in some kind of architectural quest for symmetry, especially in Georgian-style homes. But there is very little hard evidence, if any, to support this. Also, having one door placed centrally at the front of the house would provide just as much symmetry without adding a possibly superfluous door for the sake of aesthetic balance.

Still other theories argue that having two front doors offered better options for escape if the house caught on fire; that one door was used as a private entrance for newlywed children; and that doors were a cheaper alternative to glass windows. All of these lack hard evidence, but in certain cases they might have played a part in the decision to build two front doors.

When Did We Start Putting Ice in Drinks?

Ice cubes in glasses — Credit: Bettmann via Getty Images

Author Kristina Wright

July 9, 2026

Love it?75

Few things are as refreshing as an ice-cold drink on a hot day. Indeed, ice is an essential part of the beverage industry today, with the global ice maker market valued at more than $5 billion. In the United States alone, the average person consumes nearly 400 pounds of ice per year.

Despite its popularity, most of us have probably never thought about how ice-cold drinks evolved into an everyday necessity. This simple pleasure has a long and interesting history shaped by ancient ingenuity, global trade, and evolving technology. From emperors importing ice from distant mountains to entrepreneurs revolutionizing its distribution, the journey of the ice in our drinks is a story of innovation that dates back to the first human civilizations.

The Use of Ice Is 4,000 Years Old

Long before refrigerators and freezers, ancient civilizations found ingenious ways to keep drinks cool. The earliest recorded instance of ice storage dates back to the reign of Shulgi, the king of Ur in Mesopotamia from 2094 to 2046 BCE. Shulgi named the 13th year of his reign “Building of the royal icehouse/cold-house” (years were often named after a significant event), suggesting the construction of an icehouse during that period.

In China, the practice of harvesting and storing ice dates back to at least 1100 BCE. During the Zhou dynasty (1046 to 256 BCE), the royal court established a specialized department responsible for collecting natural ice blocks each winter and storing them in icehouses for use in the warmer months. This stored ice was used to cool food and beverages, including wine, and was also used in medical treatments.

Over time, ice collection became an organized practice, with officials overseeing its storage and distribution. Around 400 BCE, the Persians took preservation a step further by constructing yakchals — massive, domed icehouses made of heat-resistant mud brick. These structures allowed them to store ice year-round, even in the arid desert climate. By carefully directing water into shallow pools that froze overnight, they amassed ice supplies that could later be used to cool drinks or create early versions of frozen treats.

Sponsored Content

The Gift the Inventor of Mother's Day Wanted You To Give

6 Things Seniors Should Know About Travel Insurance Before Their Next Trip

Why Planting Flowers Can Help More Than Your Garden