“Beauty is pain” is a familiar phrase, and one that has been taken quite literally at many points in history. People have swallowed toxins such as arsenic and restricted their bodies with corsets, all in the name of status, style, and desirability. Here are five of the most extreme examples of dangerous beauty trends from decades past.
In the early 20th century, radium was briefly treated like a miracle ingredient. Following its 1898 discovery, radium’s mysterious, faint luminescence made it seem almost magical; as early as 1904, products such as the topical product Ec-Zine and even drinkable radium water were being advertised as a cure-all for everything from eczema to pimples to blood poison.
By the 1930s, beauty brands had leaned in, too. The French company Tho-Radia — so named for the elements thorium and radium — sold face creams and lipstick claiming to be a “perfect scientific method of keeping the skin of the face and neck in order.” The claims, of course, turned out to be very wrong. Long-term exposure to radium has many negative health effects, including damaging bones and increasing cancer risk. By the end of the 1930s, growing awareness of health dangers and tightening government regulations brought the use of radium in beauty and wellness products to an end.
Advertisement
More from our network
History Facts is part of Inbox Studio, an email-first media company. *Indicates a third-party property.
In Elizabethan England, pale skin was fashionable, seen as a sign of wealth and leisure. To achieve the look, many women turned to a popular foundation known as Venetian ceruse. Made with vinegar, water, and white lead powder, it certainly cast women in their desired pallor. But used over extended periods, it could also lead to skin discoloration and hair loss; over a long time, exposure to lead can also cause neurological damage.
Lead was present in other cosmetics at the time, too. Rouge was a common makeup often formulated from white lead with colored dyes mixed in. But Elizabethans weren’t the first to use lead in their beauty regimens: Evidence points to its use not only in ancient Roman times but also as far back as 3500 BCE in ancient Mesopotamia and 3000 BCE in ancient Egypt.
During the Renaissance era in Europe, especially in parts of Italy, beauty ideals often emphasized large, luminous eyes. To get the desired effect, some women used eyedrops made from Atropa belladonna, a highly toxic plant also known as deadly nightshade. The plant contains atropine — the compound that, in carefully measured, sterile doses, your eye doctor might give you today to dilate your pupils.
That’s exactly what Venetian women were aiming for, too. But their doses were unregulated and applied repeatedly for the cosmetic effect of big, alluring eyes. The cost was high: Belladonna interferes with the nervous system and often causes blurred vision, extreme light sensitivity, and disorientation, with repeated use leading to long-term vision damage or blindness.
When X-rays were discovered in 1895, they quickly earned a place in the public imagination as a kind of invisible, modern force that could do just about anything. By the early 20th century, that fascination had spilled into beauty culture, and clinics throughout North American and Europe began offering X-ray hair removal as a painless, high-tech alternative to shaving or waxing unwanted facial or body hair.
The treatment worked by damaging hair follicles with radiation exposure, leading to hair loss over time. Though that was the desired effect, what was not yet understood was the cumulative harm of the technology’s radiation. Many patients developed burns, chronic skin damage, and in some cases, cancer decades later. Eventually it became clear that the medical risks outweighed the perceived aesthetic benefits, and by the late 1940s, X-ray hair removal services were no longer offered.
At the turn of the 20th century, weight-loss culture was already established, if much less publicly advertised than today. But it reached new levels with the emergence of tapeworm dieting. Marketed through advertisements and distributed through unregulated mail-order products, the diet promised effortless slimming by ingesting tapeworm eggs, critters dubbed “friends for a fair form.”
Once inside the body, the tapeworm would allegedly hatch and go on to absorb nutrients from food, supposedly allowing the host to eat as usual while still losing weight. When a person reached their desired weight, they were meant to take an anti-parasitic treatment to kill the tapeworm and simply pass it from the body.
In reality, tapeworms can grow up to 30 feet long and cause people to have diarrhea, vomiting, malnutrition, as well as abdominal problems and more serious health concerns; they can also cause complications upon removal. While a 19th-century patent for a tapeworm trap does exist, designed to be used after ingesting the critter for weight loss, it’s likely that many of the marketed products contained laxatives or placebos instead of actual tapeworms, and the trend was all but abandoned by the mid-20th century.
Before living rooms and family rooms, there was the parlor — a space designed less for living in than for being seen. Often pristine and a little intimidating, the room was reserved for guests, special occasions, and the careful display of a family’s taste and status. Though the term has mostly disappeared today, the parlor has a long history, from medieval monasteries to middle-class domestic life. Here’s a look back at the rise and fall of the parlor.
The word “parlor” has always been about talking. The term traces back to the Old French parler, meaning “to speak,” and entered English around the 13th century as “parlur” — a word that originally referred to a small window in monasteries through which priests heard confessions. The meaning then expanded to describe a designated room within a monastery set aside for conversation — a space where the otherwise cloistered inhabitants could interact with visitors or speak privately among themselves.
That dual idea — conversation paired with separation — stuck. By the late 14th century, the word had shifted beyond religious life to describe a room set apart from a great hall and offering a measure of privacy. By the 15th century, the concept had settled into domestic architecture as a room in a private home used for receiving guests or holding more formal conversations.
Advertisement
More from our network
History Facts is part of Inbox Studio, an email-first media company. *Indicates a third-party property.
The parlor’s journey from the monastery to the middle-class home mirrors broader changes in architecture and social life. In medieval Europe, most domestic life took place in a single large hall. Privacy, in the modern sense, was rare. Over time, however, homes — especially among wealthier households — began to develop specialized rooms branching off from that central space. One of these was the parlor: a smaller, more controlled environment for conversation, business, or receiving select visitors.
Early on, the parlor wasn’t always the front-and-center “best room” we tend to imagine today. In some regions, it functioned as a private chamber or even a bedroom tucked away from the main living area. Only later — by the 18th century and especially the 19th century — did it become firmly established as a formal reception room, often located at the front of the house.
That shift coincided with the rise of the middle class in Europe. As industrialization created new wealth, families increasingly sought to display their status through their homes — and specifically through rooms designed to be seen. By the Victorian era, the parlor had become a kind of stage set: a carefully curated space where the household presented its best self to the outside world.
At its most basic level, the parlor was for receiving guests. Social calls — brief, often highly ritualized visits — were a cornerstone of life in the 18th and 19th centuries, and the parlor provided the setting. Typically located just off the entryway, it allowed visitors to be entertained without granting them access to the more private (and perhaps messier) parts of the home.
But the parlor did much more than host polite conversation. It was also a showcase. By the Victorian era, parlors were often filled — sometimes to the point of excess — with decorative objects meant to signal taste, refinement, and, above all, prosperity. Mass production made a wide array of goods available, and families eagerly filled their parlors with items such as porcelain figurines, vases, mirrors, decorative plates, and framed photographs, as well as ferns in glass cases, taxidermied birds, Japanese fans, peacock feathers, ornate clocks, and richly upholstered furniture.
Much of this work fell to women, who were typically responsible for decorating and maintaining the parlor. Their choices helped define the household’s public image, turning the room into a carefully composed expression of identity and status. Critics at the time — notably sociologist Thorstein Veblen — described this as “conspicuous consumption,” a term Veblen coined in 1899. But for many families, it was simply part of participating in middle-class life.
The parlor wasn’t always a stiff or silent place, however. It was also a center of entertainment. Before the advent of radio and television, parlors hosted a wide range of activities, from amateur theatrical performances to music and games. Families gathered around the piano to sing or dance; guests acted out charades or participated in parlor games such as Sculptor, where players froze into dramatic tableaux. More energetic pastimes — such as Blind Man’s Buff, in which a blindfolded player tried to catch others — could turn the carefully arranged room into a site of chaos. Word games, riddles, and shadow plays offered quieter alternatives, combining amusement with displays of wit and education.
And the parlor’s uses extended even further. In the 19th century, it was not uncommon for families to lay out the dead in the parlor for wakes or viewings, allowing friends and relatives to pay their respects in the home itself. Over time, however, these practices began to shift. As noted in the Oxford Research Encyclopedia of American History, changing middle-class ideas about death moved “a respectable burial from the family parlor to the funeral parlor,” unlinking mourning from the domestic space.
In all these ways — social, aesthetic, and even ritual — the parlor functioned as a kind of public-facing heart of the home.
By the early 20th century, the parlor began to lose its place in everyday life. Part of the problem was practicality. Parlors were often the most elaborately decorated rooms in a house, but also among the least used. Maintaining a space that existed primarily for occasional guests could feel wasteful, especially as ideas about home life shifted toward comfort and informality.
At the same time, social norms were changing. The rigid etiquette that governed formal visits began to fade, and families increasingly preferred spaces where they could relax rather than perform. The very qualities that had once made the parlor desirable — its formality, its separation from daily life — began to make it feel outdated.
In response, a new kind of room emerged: the living room. The name itself signaled a shift in priorities. Rather than a space reserved for appearances, the living room was designed for everyday use — a place to read, talk, and unwind. Later in the 20th century, additional informal spaces such as family rooms and rec rooms further blurred the boundaries between public and private life within the home.
The word “parlor” didn’t disappear entirely, but its meaning narrowed. It lingered in business names — ice cream parlors, beauty parlors, funeral parlors — where it retained its association with receiving the public in a designated space. In homes, however, it largely faded from use.
What remains is the idea behind it: that a room can be more than just a place to sit. For centuries, the parlor was where households performed their identity — where they spoke, displayed, entertained, and even mourned. Its disappearance marks not just a change in architecture, but a broader shift in how people think about privacy, status, and the meaning of home itself.
Secret societies have long shaped history from the shadows. Some groups have guarded spiritual truths, others operated underground to challenge political authority, and still others have connected powerful individuals across borders. While their aims vary, they share a structure: restricted membership, formal initiation, and closely guarded knowledge often revealed through a series of hierarchical ranks.
What these groups also share is a reliance on secrecy itself — not just as a tool, but as the foundation of their influence. Here’s a look at 10 secret societies that held remarkable power in their time.
For nearly 2,000 years, the Eleusinian Mysteries — a secretive religious tradition centered on the goddesses Demeter and Persephone — stood as the best-known and most enduring mystery cult in ancient Greece. Held at Eleusis, a town northwest of Athens, likely starting around 1600 BCE, the rites were open only to those who underwent a formal initiation that involved a strict vow of silence.
What initiates experienced during the Eleusinian rites remains one of history’s most tantalizing unknowns. Ancient sources agree that the ceremonies culminated in a dramatic nighttime ritual inside a grand hall known as the Telesterion, where participants went through a profound spiritual revelation — one so powerful, some claimed it erased their fear of death.
The Eleusinian Mysteries expanded across the Greek and later Roman worlds, attracting figures such as Plato, Socrates, and Cicero. Like later secret societies, it became an exclusive network whose initiates were bound by secrecy and promised personal transformation through hidden knowledge.
Advertisement
More from our network
History Facts is part of Inbox Studio, an email-first media company. *Indicates a third-party property.
Founded around the sixth century BCE by the mathematician Pythagoras (of the famous theorem), the Pythagorean Brotherhood was both a philosophical school and a tightly controlled secret society. Based in southern Italy, its members lived communally, shared property, and adhered to strict rules — including long periods of silence for new initiates — while guarding their teachings from outsiders.
At the core of the Brotherhood was a radical idea: that numbers underpinned all reality. Mathematics wasn’t just a tool but a sacred key to understanding the universe. This idea was intertwined with beliefs in the immortality of the soul and reincarnation. Members pursued purification through study, discipline, and an almost monastic lifestyle that involved strict vegetarianism.
But the Brotherhood’s influence extended beyond philosophy. Ancient sources suggest it also pursued political power, embedding itself within elite circles and shaping civic life. Ultimately, that strategy provoked backlash. By the fifth century BCE, persecution and internal strife led to the Brotherhood’s collapse. Still, its ideas endured, profoundly shaping later thinkers including Plato and leaving a lasting imprint on Western thought.
Active in the 12th and 13th centuries, the Assassins were a secretive Shiite Islamic sect known for their targeted political killings and unwavering loyalty to their leader, Ḥasan-e Ṣabbāḥ (also known as the “Old Man of the Mountains”). Operating from mountain strongholds in Lebanon, they built influence not through armies but through fear, eliminating powerful enemies with precision.
Their name is the origin of the modern word “assassin,” though its exact roots are debated. It may derive from the Arabic term asāsīyūn (“the faithful”), later conflated with hashshāshīn — or “hashish users” — a label likely spread by enemies to discredit the group. Over time, the order’s real activities became entangled with dramatic stories, from drug-induced devotion to elaborate initiation rites — many of them recorded by outsiders and difficult to verify. Even so, the Assassins stand as an early example of a secret society wielding outsized political power through secrecy, discipline, and targeted violence.
Founded around 1118 during the Crusades, the Knights Templar were a Christian military order tasked with protecting pilgrims in the Holy Land. Unlike classic secret societies, they were a highly visible institution — sanctioned by the church and deeply embedded in medieval politics — but their internal rituals, hierarchy, and initiation practices were closely guarded.
As their power grew, so did their wealth. The Templars established one of Europe’s first international banking systems, allowing travelers to deposit funds in one location and withdraw them in another. Soon they controlled vast landholdings, lent money to monarchs, and answered only to the pope, giving them extraordinary autonomy.
That combination of secrecy, wealth, and independence made them both influential and suspect. In 1307, King Philip IV of France ordered their mass arrest, and under pressure, the papacy dissolved the order in 1312 — although their legend still lingers.
Formally established in 1717 with the creation of the first Grand Lodge in London (though their roots stretch much farther back), the Freemasons grew into one of the most expansive and influential secret societies in history. Evolving from medieval stonemasons’ guilds, the organization retained a structure of lodges, initiation rites, and closely guarded rituals that bound members together across borders.
In the American colonies and early United States, Freemasonry attracted an unusually high concentration of political leaders. Thirteen of the 39 signers of the Constitution were Masons, including George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, John Hancock, and Paul Revere. Lodges functioned as spaces where educated, well-connected figures exchanged ideas shaped by Enlightenment values — including constitutional government and republicanism.
Freemasons have long been linked, sometimes speculatively, to major political upheavals, including the American, Russian, and French revolutions. Whether or not they acted in concert, their real power lay in their network: a far-reaching, oath-bound fraternity that connected influential figures and helped circulate ideas that reshaped the modern world.
Formed in 1765 in response to British taxation, the Sons of Liberty were a secretive political organization that helped drive the American colonies toward revolution. Originating in Boston and quickly spreading across the colonies, the group operated through local cells, organizing protests, intimidation campaigns, and acts of resistance against royal authority.
Their most famous action came in 1773, when members carried out the Boston Tea Party, dumping 342 chests of British tea into the harbor in defiance of imperial control. But their influence extended far beyond a single protest. The Sons of Liberty coordinated opposition to the Stamp Act and other policies, mobilizing public sentiment and, at times, using violence to enforce boycotts and punish loyalists.
Though less formal than other secret societies, they shared key traits: selective membership, covert operations, and a shared ideological mission. In effect, they functioned as an underground political network — one that helped transform colonial unrest into organized revolution.Paul Revere, John Adams, Samuel Adams, and other important figures of the American Revolution were all members.
Founded in 1776 by the German law professor Adam Weishaupt, the Bavarian Illuminati was a short-lived but highly influential secret society rooted in Enlightenment ideals. Created in opposition to what Weishaupt saw as the oppressive influence of church and state, the order sought to promote reason, moral reform, and political change through a tightly controlled, hierarchical network.
Members were recruited from educated and elite circles — including academics, officials, and intellectuals — and organized into 13 graded levels of initiation, each revealing more of the group’s aims. Like the Freemasons (from which they took some of their members), the Illuminati relied on secrecy, coded identities, and internal discipline to bind its members and extend its reach across Europe.
Despite its rapid growth, the order lasted less than a decade. At its height around 1784, the Illuminati had around 2,000 to 3,000 members, including notable figures such as Johann Wolfgang von Goethe. But within a few years the Bavarian government had outlawed the secret society, and its leaders were arrested or dispersed.
Almost immediately after being outlawed, the Illuminati became the subject of conspiracy theories linking it to revolutions and global power — a reputation that has endured ever since.
Active in early-19th-century Italy, the Carbonari were a network of clandestine groups advocating liberal reform and national independence. Their name — meaning “charcoal burners” — hints at their use of coded language and ritual symbolism.
Emerging around the Napoleonic era, the Carbonari became the primary source of opposition to conservative regimes imposed after 1815. They organized revolts, most notably the 1820 uprising in Naples, and helped lay the groundwork for the Risorgimento, the movement that led to the unification of Italy.
Despite their influence, the Carbonari were never ideologically unified. Some members favored republicanism, others constitutional monarchy. Their origin remains murky — they were possibly linked to Freemasonry or earlier mutual-aid societies. What united them was structure: secret initiations, hierarchical ranks, and a decentralized network capable of mobilizing dissent across the peninsula.
Founded at Yale University in 1832, Skull and Bones is one of the most famous collegiate secret societies in the United States, and one of the most exclusive. Each year, a small group of seniors is selected for initiation, joining a tightly knit network whose rituals and inner workings remain largely hidden from outsiders.
What sets Skull and Bones apart is not its size but its influence. Its membership has included Presidents William Howard Taft, George H.W. Bush, and George W. Bush, along with senators, judges, financiers, and intelligence officials. The society has long been seen as a pipeline into positions of power, with connections formed at Yale extending into the highest levels of American political and economic life.
While many details about its activities are speculative, its structure — selective membership, lifelong loyalty, and secrecy — places it firmly in the tradition of elite secret societies whose power lies in who they connect.
The Bohemian Club, founded in San Francisco in 1872, began as a gathering of writers, artists, and journalists but quickly evolved into an exclusive enclave for the wealthy and powerful. Its members — including presidents, business leaders, and cultural figures — meet privately throughout the year, most notably at the annual summer retreat at Bohemian Grove in California’s redwood forest.
There, members don robes, stage theatrical ceremonies, and socialize far from public scrutiny. The most famous ritual is the “Cremation of Care” ceremony, a musical drama held in front of a concrete owl. While the club insists these traditions are merely playful, the secrecy surrounding the gatherings — and the prominence of those who attend — has fueled decades of speculation.
More than a conventional secret society, the Bohemian Club is a rarefied social network where influence and access converge. Its power lies less in ideology than in proximity: a private space where some of the world’s most powerful figures can meet off the record.
If you’ve been to a traditional (or somewhat traditional) Christian wedding recently, you may have noticed that the bride generally stands on the left and the groom on the right during the ceremony. If somewhere between the vows and the bouquet toss you found yourself wondering about the “why” behind that arrangement, you’re not alone. So how did this tradition emerge?
Advertisement
More from our network
History Facts is part of Inbox Studio, an email-first media company. *Indicates a third-party property.
A quick scan of the internet will show you that most explanations for this custom center on the idea of “marriage by capture.” The idea is that in centuries past, men would abduct women to be their brides, either in secret or by slaying the woman’s family. This is said to affect the standing positions during the matrimonial ceremony because grooms needed to keep their sword hand — their dominant hand — free in case anyone came to try to take the bride back. Because most men are right-handed, standing on the right meant that the left hand could be free for wedding duties while the right hand would be ready to pull out a sword if there was trouble.
As swashbuckling and dramatic as that may sound, there’s little evidence to support this theory, and also little evidence that marriage by capture was ever a common occurrence in Europe. Marriage by capture probably did happen on occasion — it’s mentioned in Greek mythology, the Bible, and ancient Hindu legal texts. But if it seems like an unworkable way to conduct society at large, that’s because it is.
The idea of marriage by capture was notably championed by Scottish lawyer and ethnologist John Ferguson McLennan in his 1865 book Primitive Marriage. However, more recent historians and anthropologists have noted that McLennan made no distinction between the ritualized mock battles that take place in a number of cultures before marriage and actual abduction.
Other explanations highlight the sword hand idea but don’t directly tie it to the capture theory. Instead, the groom having his sword hand free was meant to be a general boon to the bride’s protection, in case of impending duels from jilted lovers and the like. But this too lacks evidence. In fact, the sword hand theory seems to have emerged as part of a 19th-century fascination for explaining customs (wedding and otherwise) with reference to a rough, barbaric past, even when actual evidence is thin.
So why does the bride usually stand on the left in Christian weddings? Like many traditions, it probably arose for a bunch of different reasons, rather than one clear one. Wedding customs vary a lot by religion and region, and the standing arrangement isn’t consistent.
In some regions and eras the bride stood on the right instead. (That’s the case in today’s Jewish weddings.) The practice of standing on the left likely arose in Christian Europe thanks to some combination of liturgical symbolism (the right side is associated with honor and authority in Christian tradition) and the practicalities of ritual (the groom sometimes needed to use his right hand to receive the bride from her father or place the ring).
By the 19th century, Western wedding positioning — and many other customs — had become standardized in etiquette manuals. By that time, the original reasons for the custom were unclear.
Today, however, etiquette experts say the people getting married should feel free to stand on whichever side they like. Factors to consider include whether the sun might get in your eyes, showing off your good side, and facing your side of the family (if seating arrangements are split down the aisle). Thankfully, you probably won’t have to worry about which hand can more easily grab your sword.
In 1888, Sears, Roebuck and Co. distributed its first mail-order catalog to U.S. households, a thin booklet that sold only watches and jewelry. But by the early 1900s, the Chicago-based business had greatly expanded its inventory, offering a world of goods that some rural Americans had never even laid eyes on.
The Sears catalog became a go-to for one-stop shopping: Everything from clothing and furniture to tools and toys and even full house-building kits could be ordered and delivered right to doorsteps across the country. But tucked between these practical items were some truly strange and surprising products. Here’s a look at some of the oddest things the Sears catalog had on offer.
In the early 20th century, electric belts were marketed as medical marvels, promising to cure everything from fatigue and hernias to glaucoma and indigestion. The fall 1902 Sears catalog featured the Heidelberg Electric Belt, a deluxe model that boldly claimed to be the “cure of […] all diseases, disorders and weaknesses peculiar to men, no matter from what cause or how long standing” — quite the claim for just $18 (about $680 today).
Customers strapped metal plates connected to small batteries around their waists or limbs, hoping for a restorative jolt. Medical evidence on the belt’s effectiveness was nonexistent, but the device certainly captured the era’s fascination with so-called cure-alls.
Advertisement
More from our network
History Facts is part of Inbox Studio, an email-first media company. *Indicates a third-party property.
Sears didn’t just sell the necessities of life — it also offered items for the afterlife. In 1906, the company published a special catalog offering a variety of gravestones in marble and granite; pricing varied by material, size, and messages engraved in the stone.
All headstones were customizable, but Sears also offered a convenient list of pre-chosen epitaphs and their accompanying prices. “Gone, but not forgotten,” for instance, cost $1.14 (about $40) today. Sears prided itself on customer testimonials, boasting that for a fraction of the cost of a funeral home’s services it delivered “the finest stone in the cemetery.”
Sears was no stranger to selling and shipping live animals. Common pets such as dogs, birds, and fish appeared frequently in its pages from the mid-1950s to the mid-’60s, as did animals such as baby chicks and chickens for farm life. More surprising, however, were the shipments of bees.
Through Sears’ “Farm and Ranch” catalog editions, customers could order specialty “Italian” or “Midnite” bees by the package, with a shipment containing upwards of 6,000 bees including a queen. For those unsure what to do once their buzzing box arrived, Sears also sold beekeeping guides and protective veils.
Heroin was sold legally in the U.S. in the early 1900s, primarily as a treatment for the morphine addiction that proliferated following the Civil War. For just $1.50 (around $60 today), customers could have two vials of heroin, a syringe, two needles, and a handy carrying case delivered to their door.
The catalog also offered an array of other curious remedies from the time: nerve pills, “worm syrup” for children, pills for pale complexions, and other treatments now considered dangerous or pseudoscientific.
Sears catalogs catered to the practical needs of rural life, including the sometimes gritty job of taking care of animals. Wolf teeth extractors, designed to remove the small, sharp “wolf teeth” in horses, were part of a broader selection of veterinary tools. Alongside them, customers could easily order castrating knives, worm powders, poultry markers, and other specialized equipment that would make most modern retail consumers wince.
Fur trapping remained a legitimate profession in early America, and Sears catalogs supplied the necessary wares. Otter traps were typically made of steel and were spring-loaded — just the thing that rural customers needed for trapping fur, food, or even just for pest control.
In the early 1920s, Sears went a step further and began buying furs from its customers to sell in its own “Sears Tips to Trappers” catalog and at its fur show. The company ran the fur business until the late 1950s, when its focus shifted from the rural market to its burgeoning urban customer base.
Before we knew its health hazards, asbestos was hailed as a miracle material thanks to its durability and fire resistance. Sears offered not only asbestos-based siding, roof coatings, and tiles to homeowners, but also — alarmingly — cooking tools. Asbestos-lined and coated omelet pans, stove linings, stove mats, and toasters were all featured in a 1902 catalog. It wasn’t until the 1980s that asbestos’ possible health hazards were fully understood and the material was no longer used in American homes.
The Sears catalog wasn’t just about goods — it also offered educational opportunities that its rural customers may not have otherwise had access to. In the fall 1907 catalog, a six-month bookkeeping course was offered for the low price of just $5. The course included about 20 different ledgers, journals, and balance sheet books totaling 7 pounds of materials, as well as free penmanship instruction — at about $173 today, that’s still a bargain.
Without context, a 100-pound bag of crushed oyster shells seems like one of the most bizarre items a catalog could offer. So what was it for? Poultry feed. Chickens — more specifically, laying hens — require a lot of calcium to ensure they lay strong, healthy eggs. Crushed oyster shells served as an important dietary supplement for the farm animals, as a natural source of slow-release calcium that, today, commercial pet food companies incorporate right into their products.
Inspired by Turkish hammam traditions, Sears brought some soothing heat to the home with its vapor bath cabinets. These wooden or metal enclosures allowed users to sit inside while steam circulated around the body; only the head was left exposed. Sears claimed that its vapor baths could “free the skin and tissues of the poisons that clog and injure the system,” a sentiment shared by the era’s belief in steam as a therapeutic tool. At a time when Victorian bathhouses and steam treatments were still quite popular, these cabinets offered a way to recreate the experience at home — no overseas spa-town visit required.
Over the course of a single day, you might talk to several people — but you’re also communicating in nonverbal ways you probably don’t even notice. There are small, habitual movements that we all slip into conversations almost automatically, without giving much thought to where they came from or why we use them.
Even though they feel natural, most of these everyday motions have surprisingly long and interesting histories, gradually leading to the meanings we recognize today. Some trace back thousands of years, while others became widespread only in recent decades, spreading through travel or mass media. Here are five familiar examples of how we connect without words.
Today, the thumbs-up gesture is widely recognized as a sign of approval, agreement, or reassurance that things are all good. It appears in everyday conversation, digital communication, and professional settings as a quick signal of affirmation.
A popular belief links the gesture to ancient Rome, where crowds supposedly used thumbs-up or thumbs-down to decide the fate of defeated gladiators. However, historians generally agree this interpretation is likely incorrect or oversimplified, though we may never know for sure.
The modern meaning of thumbs-up developed much later. t started to appear as a sign of approval in English-speaking countries by the early 20th century, and it became especially widespread during World War I and World War II, when Allied pilots used it to mean “ready” or “all set.” From there, the gesture spread globally through media, technology, and popular culture, becoming one of the most recognized hand signals today (though it is considered rude in some cultures abroad).
Advertisement
More from our network
History Facts is part of Inbox Studio, an email-first media company. *Indicates a third-party property.
The peace sign — formed by raising the index and middle fingers in a “V” shape — is a casual greeting used today to signal acknowledgment and friendliness, but its meaning has shifted significantly over time.
The gesture first gained widespread recognition during World War II, when British Prime Minister Winston Churchill popularized the “V” sign as a symbol for “victory” in the fight against Nazi Germany. The gesture became part of a broader Allied campaign, reinforced by media and propaganda, and was widely understood to represent resilience and triumph.
In the 1960s, the same gesture was reinterpreted during anti-war movements, especially in the United States in response to the Vietnam War. Activists adopted the “V” sign as a call for peace rather than as a support for military victory, reflecting a broader cultural shift toward nonviolence. Because the symbol was already widely recognized, it was easily repurposed, helping it spread quickly through protest movements as a symbol for peace.
Waving a hand to greet someone or say goodbye feels instinctive today, and while the origins of this social gesture are hard to trace, many researchers believe it may have developed from early signals of peaceful intent.
Anthropologists and body language scholars suggest that raising an open hand could have served as a way to show that a person was unarmed. Displaying an empty palm — clearly visible to others — would have helped communicate that no weapon was being held, making it safer to approach strangers.
Over time, this practical signal likely evolved into a social greeting. The side-to-side motion associated with modern waving may have emerged as a way to attract attention or increase visibility, especially from a distance. Today, waving is used around the world as a friendly motion, though its form and frequency can differ across cultures.
The handshake is one of the most widely recognized gestures in professional and social settings, used to greet others, mark agreements, and signal mutual respect.
Historical evidence suggests the gesture dates back thousands of years. Depictions from ancient Greece — includingreliefs and funerary art from the fifth century BCE — show individuals clasping hands in what is often interpreted as a symbol of trust, agreement, or equality. Like other open-hand gestures, the handshake may have originated as a practical way to demonstrate peaceful intent.
From the 17th to the 19th centuries, handshakes became increasingly formalized in Europe. While the gesture itself predates this period — appearing in ancient Greek, Roman, and Mesopotamian cultures — the modern handshake as a common greeting and symbol of agreement spread more widely across the European continent, where etiquette and social norms codified their use in diplomatic, commercial, and social interactions.
Today, handshakes remain common worldwide, though customs vary, with grip strength, duration, frequency, and accompanying gestures differing across regions and cultures. In some societies, handshakes are lighter or combined with a bow, while in others they are firmer and more prolonged.
A shrug — lifting both shoulders, often with palms turned upward — is a common nonverbal gesture used to signal uncertainty, lack of knowledge, indifference, or resignation. People often pair it with phrases such as “I don’t know” or “Who knows?” to reinforce the meaning.
The gesture works because it visually reinforces the idea that the person has no answer or firm stance to offer. As a purely nonverbal gesture, the shrug can be understood across many languages, but it’s most common in Western cultures, where it clearly signals uncertainty or indifference. While the precise historical origin of the shrug is hard to trace, the word itself comes from Middle Englishschruggen (“to draw together” or “to shrink”), which originally described the physical act of raising the shoulders.
Scholars also note that elements of the shrug — shoulder lifting, palms facing up, and raised eyebrows — appear across many cultures as signals of uncertainty or detachment. Few gestures capture one of the most human feelings of all as clearly as a shrug: the silent acknowledgement that, sometimes, we simply don’t know.
Few social rituals are as widespread or instinctive as clinking glasses after a toast. At weddings, dinners, and bars and pubs around the world, we reach across the table, touch glasses with a satisfying clink and a quick “cheers,” and take a sip. But where does this custom actually come from? Let’s take a look at the origins of this familiar custom, and try to sort the myth from reality.
The most common origin story goes something like this: In medieval times, clinking cups or glasses hard enough would cause liquid to slosh and spill from one vessel into another, so if your drinking companion had poisoned your cup, they’d be consuming poison too. As such, the clinking was a way to show that no drinks had been spiked, whether with belladonna, hemlock, arsenic, mercury, or any other common toxin — poison being a popular way of eliminating one’s rivals in the Middle Ages, especially among the nobility.
Despite being widely repeated, this theory doesn’t make much sense if you think about it — and, indeed, it’s almost certainly not true. Both Snopes and Ripley’s have debunked the theory, concluding that all versions of this explanation are false. The logistics alone are problematic. Even if a cup or glass were filled to the brim — which in many cases it would not be — most of the clinking spillage would land on the floor, not in your companion’s cup. And if some drops of ale- or wine-diluted poison did enter, would it be enough to cause much harm? Perhaps not.
What’s more, as Snopespoints out, the practice of toasting to someone’s health dates back to the ancient world at least — well before individual glasses were common. In those times, everyone typically drank using shared vessels, rather than carrying around their own glass or cup. Producing your own private drinking vessel at a communal table would likely raise suspicion, rather than guard against it.
Advertisement
More from our network
History Facts is part of Inbox Studio, an email-first media company. *Indicates a third-party property.
One alternative theory, of no precise origin, suggests that clinking glasses was meant to frighten away evil spirits. In medieval Europe, there was a superstitious belief that evil spirits lurked in alcohol or hovered around celebrations. The high-pitched sound of touching glasses, according to the theory, would chase them away. It’s a nice idea, and there may be some truth to the story, but there’s scant evidence to support it being the sole, or even partial, origin of this toast ritual.
Another theory suggests the practice was a way to complete the sensory experience of drinking. Sipping wine and toasting already involved sight, touch, smell, and taste — and the clink added sound, the last of the five senses. Historian Margaret Visser argues that clinking grew in popularity during the 17th century, when Venetian glassmakers perfected the art of clear, resonant crystal. For the first time, drinking vessels produced a beautiful ringing tone when struck together, and that sensory pleasure became part of the ritual.
The most accurate answer to why we clink glasses is also the least satisfying: Nobody really knows for sure. The toasting of someone’s health is an ancient ritual, rooted in Greek and Roman drinking culture and quite likely long before — and these ancient civilizations may well have knocked their mugs and cups together in rowdy celebration or solemn toasts.
The more delicate clink likely became fashionable in the 17th century, when new glassware made the sound more appealing — and possibly because it gave people a way to maintain the communal spirit of shared drinking in an age of individual cups. The one thing that seems almost certain is that the poison theory holds no water, let alone any wine. Despite being the most widespread theory — repeated at dinner tables and now online — it is almost certainly a myth.
Advertisement
Advertisement
The Way People Slept 300 Years Ago Would Horrify You
Today, it’s common to complain of a lack of sleep; in some circles, it’s almost a badge of honor. Work and family obligations, not to mention endless digital distractions, often cut into our shut-eye. It’s easy to assume that we’re more poorly rested than our ancestors, who surely slumbered deeply and peacefully without all those glowing screens — right? Well, wrong.
The first problem was the beasts, both big and small. Before climbing into bed, families often conducted a nightly hunt for fleas, lice, and bedbugs, combing through bedding in a somewhat futile attempt to reduce the itching to come. Straw mattresses and shared blankets were ideal habitats for parasites, and the presence of dogs and livestock only made things worse.
And we’re not kidding when we say livestock. In many rural households, animals were brought indoors at night for warmth and protection from predators and theft. Chickens, goats, and even cows might share the same space — along with all the noise, smells, and bugs they carried. (Speaking of smells, some families in East Anglia reportedly placed lumps of cow dung at the foot of the bed to ward off gnats, a solution that likely traded one problem for another.)
Even without animals, nighttime was anything but peaceful. Poor insulation meant drafts crept through walls and floors; open chimneys carried in soot and smells; chamber pots added their own aroma. From outside came the sounds of barking dogs, croaking frogs, and passing carts. Inside, every cough, snore, and shift of a bedmate was impossible to ignore.
Advertisement
More from our network
History Facts is part of Inbox Studio, an email-first media company. *Indicates a third-party property.
Credit: Stereograph Cards/Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. (LC-DIG-stereo-1s44398)
Sharing (Beds) Is Caring
For most people, sleep was also a communal activity. Beds were valuable — sometimes one of the most expensive items a household owned — and they were rarely reserved for just one person. Entire families might pile into a single bed, often joined by visitors. In inns or when traveling, sharing a bed with a stranger was standard practice.
This arrangement came with its own etiquette. In a family home, women usually slept toward the wall to keep them safe from intruders, with men and visitors closest to the door. Bedfellows were expected to lie still, keep to their side, and avoid hogging the covers. Not everyone succeeded. Samuel Pepys, the 17th-century English diarist, even ranked his bedmates based on their conversation and behavior.
Famous American figures weren’t exempt, either. In 1776, John Adams and Benjamin Franklin shared a bed at a crowded inn, arguing over whether to keep a window open — Adams feared catching cold, while Franklin insisted fresh air was good for one’s health — until Adams finally fell asleep mid-lecture.
Before habits changed between roughly the 15th and 17th centuries, many Europeans slept on simple straw pallets laid on dirt floors. Even later, poorer households continued to rely on mattresses stuffed with straw or rags. In parts of Scotland and Ireland, entire families slept on floors strewn with rushes or heather.
Winter brought another challenge: the cold. Without central heating, beds could be freezing. People used bed warmers — pans of hot coals or heated stones wrapped in cloth — to take the edge off, though these came with obvious risks. And fire was a constant concern. A stray spark from a candle or hearth could quickly ignite thatched roofs, wooden beams, or straw bedding, turning a quiet night into a disaster.
Night air itself was widely thought to be dangerous, leading people to wear caps in bed or even cover their faces outdoors. Meanwhile, fears of burglary meant going to bed was often described as “shutting in,” a defensive act in a world where darkness provided cover for thieves — and, many believed, for witches, spirits, and other supernatural threats prowling about in the night.
As for those unbroken eight hours of shut-eye we imagine in the past? Far from it. For centuries, many people slept in two distinct phases: a “first sleep” and a “second sleep.” After a few hours of rest, they would wake naturally in the middle of the night and remain awake for an hour or two before returning to bed.
This interval — sometimes called “the watching” in English — wasn’t considered a problem. People used the time to pray, reflect on dreams, chat, do light chores, or even visit neighbors. Some medical texts suggested it was an ideal time for intimacy, when the body was relaxed.
Historian A. Roger Ekirch has uncovered hundreds of references to this pattern across diaries, literature, and legal records, not just in Europe but around the world. Later studies have found similar nighttime wakefulness in places such as Madagascar, where people often wake briefly after midnight and nap frequently during the day.
Not everyone agrees on how universal segmented sleep was, but there’s growing evidence that it was widespread — and that our bodies may still be wired for it. In the 1990s, a sleep experiment conducted in extended darkness found that participants naturally fell into a two-part sleep pattern, with a calm, meditative waking period in between.
So what changed? Beginning in the 17th and 18th centuries, the conditions around nighttime, and our ideas about it, evolved. Street lighting, coffeehouses, professional police, and a growing culture of evening entertainment encouraged people to stay up later, while the Enlightenment helped banish the associations between nighttime and evil.
By the 19th century, consolidated sleep was the norm, at least outside rural areas — and by the 20th century, the idea of waking in the middle of the night had shifted from normal to problematic.
All of which is to say: However restless your nights may feel, they’re probably still an improvement. Your bed likely isn’t crawling with lice, doubling as a livestock shelter, or shared with a traveling stranger. Modern sleep may not be perfect — but compared to 300 years ago, it’s practically a dream.
Advertisement
Advertisement
The Oldest Time Capsules — and What They Contained
The term “time capsule” was coined at the 1939 New York World’s Fair, when the Westinghouse electric company buried a large, torpedo-shaped capsule — containing everyday items, literature, and microfilm recordings of news events from the era — to be opened in 5,000 years’ time. But that capsule certainly wasn’t the first historic cache to have been deliberately left for future discovery. Here’s a look at the earliest time capsules ever discovered (or rediscovered), and what these bundles of frozen history contained.
What is possibly the oldest known time capsule was found during renovations at the Church of St. Stanislaus in Wschowa, Poland. In 2023, workers found a copper box that had been placed inside the church spire. The box itself was inscribed with the year 1726. Inside, conservators found four packages tied with twine, containing around 300 old coins from the 18th and 19th centuries, as well as medals, newspapers, and documents relating to the town’s history. It was clear that people had added items to the box over the decades. Whether the box itself was first placed in 1726 or after is hard to determine, but it seems likely that the Wschowa time capsule is the oldest ever discovered.
Advertisement
More from our network
History Facts is part of Inbox Studio, an email-first media company. *Indicates a third-party property.
There’s an argument to be made that the 38-pound copper grasshopper on top of Boston’s Faneuil Hall isn’t a time capsule in the true sense, but it does kind of fit the bill. In 1742, a copper grasshopper weather vane was installed atop the structure. Later, in 1768, Thomas Drowne (the son of the master craftsman who built the weather vane) placed a note inside the body of the grasshopper entitled “Food for the Grasshopper.” The note, addressed to “my brethren and fellow grasshoppers,” mentioned some of the building’s history, including an earthquake that once toppled the grasshopper from its lofty position.
After that first note was placed, people began adding coins and notes every time the weather vane was brought down for repairs, creating an inadvertent time capsule. Unfortunately, the weather vane, valued at around $300,000, was stolen in 1974. It was later found, but its historic contents were missing. The grasshopper was returned to its rightful place, with fresh notes and items added to its belly, beginning the process anew.
In 1795, American revolutionaries Samuel Adams and Paul Revere placed a time capsule beneath a cornerstone of the Massachusetts State House in Boston. It was a ceremonial affair, with 15 white horses — one for each state in the union — pulling the stone to its resting place. The time capsule contained an engraved silver plaque, a medal honoring George Washington, and coins dating to 1652. It was dug up and opened in 1855, at which time more items were added — including silver and copper coins from 1851 to 1855 and a selection of newspapers. Everything was placed in a newly built brass box and returned to the original resting place.
In 2014, builders doing work on the foundation of the State House rediscovered the time capsule. It was X-rayed and then carefully opened at Boston’s Museum of Fine Arts, allowing conservators to examine the long-buried contents. The artifacts were then placed in a new stainless steel time capsule — along with a mint set of 2015 U.S. coins and a silver plaque commemorating the latest unearthing and reburial — and returned to their location beneath the cornerstone.
During restoration work on the Cathedral of the Good Shepherd — Singapore’s oldest Catholic church — in 2016, workers discovered a shoebox-sized time capsule beneath a foundation stone. The capsule was placed in 1843, probably by French Catholic missionary priests. When conservators opened the 173-year-old capsule, they found a prayer booklet and newspapers from 1843, along with 24 British, French, and Spanish coins from the 18th and 19th centuries. The historic artifacts were placed on public display in the cathedral’s heritage gallery.
In 1876, Anna Deihm, a publisher from New York, came up with the idea for a time capsule for the Centennial Exposition in Philadelphia to commemorate the nation’s 100th anniversary. Unlike earlier time capsules, this one — called the Century Safe — had a specific future opening date: the bicentennial in 1976.
A velvet-lined safe was chosen as the capsule, which was then stuffed with all manner of 19th-century relics, including a gold pen belonging to poet Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, a book on temperance, a scroll signed by members of the 44th Congress, and portrait photographs of President Ulysses S. Grant.
The capsule was placed under the East Portico of the U.S. Capitol — and largely forgotten about. Thankfully, some diligent soul remembered the Century Safe just in time to have it restored and unlocked on schedule in 1976. At the opening ceremony, Senator Mike Mansfield said that the unveiling of the time capsule had fulfilled “the wish of a lady who sought to speak to us from the other side of a 100-year gulf.”
If you were to book a room at a one-star roadside motel, you wouldn’t expect the same amenities you’d find at a luxury five-star resort. But there is one commonality they’re likely to share: a Bible tucked away in the drawer of the bedside table.
Bibles have been a familiar presence in hotel rooms for more than a century, and though the tradition has been declining in recent years, the bedside Bible remains an iconic part of American travel. But how did the book become a hotel staple? The origins can be traced back to the turn of the 20th century, with the creation of an evangelical Christian organization known as the Gideons.
The Gideons International was founded in 1899 with a simple mission: to share the word of God. It held its first official convention in 1900, and by 1901, its bylaws stated, “The object of the Gideons shall be to recognize the Christian traveling men of the world with cordial fellowship … scattering seeds all along the pathway for Christ.”
The first clue that distributing Bibles would be the perfect way to achieve this objective came in 1903, when a Chicago-based Gideon member named Fred Woodcock took a trip to Britain. He discovered that the Commercial Travellers’ Christian Association was distributing Bibles to hotels throughout England, and when he returned to the U.S., he suggested the Gideons follow suit. Due to financial limitations within the organization, there was no means of doing so at the time, but the Gideons procured enough funds by 1908 to make this goal a reality.
Advertisement
More from our network
History Facts is part of Inbox Studio, an email-first media company. *Indicates a third-party property.
The first hotel to bite was in Superior, Montana, thanks to a Gideon member named Archie Bailey. Bailey frequently patronized the Superior Hotel, and one day he asked hotel proprietor Edna Wilkinson if he could leave a Bible at the front desk to help spread the word of God to other guests. Wilkinson countered with an ambitious request of her own, asking if it’d be possible to put Bibles in each room. On November 9, 1908, Bailey contacted the Gideons and ordered 25 Bibles, which were later distributed throughout the hotel. Though it wasn’t known at the time, this event marked the start of a widespread trend.
Hotels were an appealing way for the Gideons to spread their message, as the frequent turnover in each room meant a plethora of potential converts. By the organization’s own estimates, each Bible would be seen by 2,300 guests during the book’s six-year lifespan. When a new hotel opened in the U.S., Gideon missionaries visited the general manager to donate copies of the Bible for free, and many hotels were happy to accept. Some hotel owners believed that the Scripture provided a sense of comfort; Bibles also provided something to read in those early days when in-room entertainment was limited.
By the 1920s, the Gideons were synonymous with hotel Bible distribution. At first, they primarily distributed copies of the American Standard Version of the Bible, though that was eventually superseded by the King James Version. In 1974, the New International Version was approved for use as well. Other groups such as the Mormons attempted to capitalize on this trend, distributing religious texts of their own, which is why some hotels display a Gideon Bible, others the Book of Mormon, and in rarer cases, both texts side by side.
The Gideons expanded their reach to other institutions as well. They began distributing Bibles to hospitals in 1916, public classrooms in 1937 (though states began to push back on this in the 1950s), and the U.S. military in 1941. They also expanded beyond the U.S., beginning with Canada in 1911, then Sweden in 1919, and the British Isles in 1949, as offshoots of the Gideons were formed.
From 1908 to 2022, the Gideons distributed a staggering 2.5 billion Bibles in hotels and other locales. The organization is now nearing the 3 billion milestone, as roughly 80 million Bibles are donated each year, according to the organization. The group has also distributed Bibles in more than 200 countries and territories worldwide. The Gideons largely fund these efforts through donations. In 2025, the organization received $167.9 million, $100.2 million of which was used to buy and place copies of the Bible worldwide.
That said, recent trends show you’re less likely to encounter a Bible in the average hotel room today than in the past — due in part to a societal shift in the United States. According to the hotel analytics firm STR, 95% of U.S.-based hotel rooms contained a Bible as recently as 20 years ago in 2006. That percentage dropped to 79% by 2016, and updated estimates from 2025 show a continued decline down to 69%. But even with the decline, that’s still tens of millions of hotel rooms where a Bible is waiting in the drawer — a simple amenity with a 125-year-old history.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Another History Pick for You
Today in History
Get a daily dose of history’s most fascinating headlines — straight from Britannica’s editors.