Why Are Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, Virginia, and Kentucky Called Commonwealths?

Author Nicole Villeneuve
November 7, 2024

Love it?

The United States is made up of 50 states, yet four of them — Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, Virginia, and Kentucky — are officially referred to as commonwealths. Their names are technically styled as the Commonwealth of Virginia, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, etc. The term “commonwealth” is frequently associated with Great Britain, and its ongoing alignment with many countries that were formerly part of the British Empire. But in the U.S., which was also once under British rule, the term has a somewhat different meaning. 

A commonwealth is defined as a political entity founded for the good of the people. The word dates back to the mid-15th century and was given weight by political philosophers such as John Locke and Thomas Hobbes throughout the 17th century. The term was also popularized during this period due to the execution of England’s King Charles I in 1649. After the king’s death, the country was declared a republic, and was known as the Commonwealth of England until the monarchy was restored in 1660. 

This concept of a state existing for the benefit of its citizens — not for any one individual, such as a monarch — is the idea behind the use of the word in the United States. Its use dates back to colonial times and the revolutionary ideals of governance and political rhetoric that were paramount to the cause of American independence. 

What Did Oranges Used To Look Like? (They Weren’t Always Orange)

Author Tony Dunnell
November 7, 2024

Love it?

When we think of oranges today, we picture an almost perfectly round fruit with a sweet, citric, juicy interior that is, as the name suggests, orange in color. It’s a common fruit around the world; in the U.S., oranges consistently rank as the third-most-consumed fresh fruit behind bananas and apples — and it ranks No. 1 among juices. 

But oranges weren’t always as popular or as common as they are today — and they didn’t even look the same. The oranges we’re familiar with are the result of thousands of years of cultivation and selective breeding. Here, we peel back the layers of history to discover what oranges used to look like and how they evolved into the fruit we enjoy today.

Credit: Sepia Times/ Universal Images Group via Getty Images

The Origins of Oranges

Oranges, and all other citrus fruits, can trace their roots to the southeast foothills of the Himalayas. According to DNA evidence, the first citrus trees appeared in this region about 8 million years ago; from there, they spread across the Indian subcontinent and then to south-central China. These ancient citrus fruits, however, were nothing like the oranges we know today. They were smaller, often bitter, and came in a variety of shapes and colors, from knobby, yellow fruits akin to the modern citron to large, green, smooth-skinned citruses similar to the modern pomelo.

All the oranges, lemons, limes, and grapefruits we eat today are descendants of just a handful of ancient species, namely citrons, pomelos, and mandarins, all native to South Asia and East Asia. The sweet orange we know today, which accounts for about 70% of global orange production, is a cultivated hybrid of the ancient pomelo — a large, pale green or yellow fruit with a thick rind — and ancient mandarins, which were then only a little larger than olives. That original hybrid, however, would have been quite different from the oranges we have today.  

What $20 Could Buy You Through History

Author Nicole Villeneuve
October 31, 2024

Love it?

Imagine walking into a grocery store with $20 in your pocket. What can you buy? Today, you might be able to grab some pasta and vegetables for the night’s dinner and have leftovers for tomorrow’s lunch, if you’re lucky. The purchasing power of a dollar has changed dramatically from the early days of American history, largely due to the ever-increasing prices of the things we spend money on — that pesky reality we call inflation. Twenty bucks might not put much in your grocery bag now, but in the mid-20th century, it could easily stock your pantry — or even cover a visit to the doctor. Here’s what $20 could comfortably buy you at different times in U.S. history.

Credit: Fotosearch/ Archive Photos via Getty Images

Colonial Era

The colonial American economy primarily used a mix of British currency (pounds, shillings, and pence), Spanish dollars, and various forms of local currency. There was no unified economic system; the value of money and exchange rates varied among colonies, and historians admit it’s a challenge to draw direct comparisons to modern prices. Using various online converters, we can loosely estimate $20 to be equivalent to about 100 shillings at the time. In the 1730s, 20 shillings could buy 50 acres of land in Maryland or about 3 pounds of beef in New England. In 1777, the same amount would outfit a man in a full suit of broadcloth in Rhode Island. 

Of course, while it’s fun to speculate, it’s nearly impossible to determine with any certainty how much $20 was worth in colonial America, as there was no standard national currency until the U.S. won independence at the end of the Revolutionary War.

When Did People Start Using Money? 

Author Timothy Ott
October 31, 2024

Love it?

It’s been said that money makes the world go round. It’s also been said that money is the root of all evil. Whichever theory you subscribe to, both of these contrasting views highlight the ubiquity of currency in modern society. 

We often take for granted the process of shelling out cash for food at the grocery store, setting aside regular amounts for the mortgage or rent, or spending a few extra bucks on a new shirt or shoes. These are the hallmarks of modern living — but they haven’t always been.

Humans have been around for about 300,000 years, began banding together in settlements some 12,000 years ago, and set the foundations of major civilizations 5,500 years ago. So when did the all-encompassing presence of money enter the equation?

Credit: Shutterstock AI Generator/ Shutterstock

Bartering and Neolithic Cattle

Historians agree that before there was money, there was bartering — the exchange of one form of goods or services for another in a way that satisfied both parties. This process dates back thousands of years, to at least the Upper Paleolithic period (roughly 50,000 to 10,000 years ago). But experts differ as to the next steps in the economic timeline, depending on their specialty. Some economists have argued, based on the writings of Adam Smith in The Wealth of Nations, that money developed from the bartering system. However, scholars in the fields of anthropology and archaeology are more likely to contend that money was created by governments as a means of exerting control. Part of the uncertainty, of course, comes from the difficulty of tracing the development of a system across different parts of the world with a lack of definitive recorded evidence. 

However it was introduced, ancient money generally fulfilled a few major guidelines: It served as a unit of exchange, represented a measure of value, enabled the payment of debts, and could be accumulated as a wealth reserve. Prior to the existence of metallic coins and (far later) paper cash, this meant the use of a wide array of items that fulfilled some combination of practical and ornamental function.

The oldest form of money may well be the use of cattle dating back to the Neolithic era — while far less portable than modern forms of money, it fit the other requirements of providing a standard measure of value and being easily counted. Other nonmetallic forms of currency from various cultures through the centuries include amber, beads, cocoa beans, ivory, leather, quartz, rice, salt, and whale teeth.

The Evolution of Hemlines Through History

Author Nicole Villeneuve
October 30, 2024

Love it?

Worn by both men and women in early civilizations such as Egypt and Rome, skirts and dresses gradually transformed into quintessential symbols of femininity in the Western world. For centuries, these garments reached the floor as a mark of modesty, but practicality and changing tastes occasionally nudged hemlines higher, such as with the “walking dress” and its ankle-skimming hem, which emerged by the mid-1800s. By the late 19th century, it wasn’t unheard of to see a skirt hit midcalf, a look that forecasted the more dramatic shifts that started in the early 1900s. 

While we tend to think of the evolution of hemlines as a simple upward trajectory, getting shorter as society evolved and fashion became more daring, their history is much more nuanced. Hemlines have risen and fallen several times in the last 100 years. And though the popular “hemline index” theory suggests that skirt lengths rise in times of economic prosperity and fall during downturns, that’s an oversimplification of the story. Far from a one-way trend, hemlines have been a dynamic reflection of fashion, function, and symbolism through the years. Here are a few of the most significant changes in the 20th century.

Credit: Kirn Vintage Stock/ Corbis Historical via Getty Images

1920s: The Flapper Era

The 1920s marked the first major departure from traditional floor-length skirts. Following World War I, the Roaring ’20s brought economic stability to the U.S. — and a newfound sense of empowerment and liberation for women, who had won the right to vote in 1920. Women enjoyed vibrant social lives even in the depths of Prohibition, frequenting speakeasies and private clubs and dancing the night away. It was a time when the restrictive clothing of the past just would not do; hemlines shot up, at first to just below the knee, and by the mid-1920s, even creeping above. The new dress style also did away with the tightly corseted fashions of earlier decades, ushering in a less-structured “Garçonne” look (an androgynous or “tomboy” style) that was free of curves and had dropped waists, loose fits, and a straighter silhouette.

What Your Last Name Says About Your History

Author Kristina Wright
October 24, 2024

Love it?

Last names, also known as surnames, can be more than just family identifiers — they can be gateways to understanding more about our ancestral history, cultural heritage, and even ancient migration patterns. The practice of using last names began as populations expanded and it became necessary to distinguish individuals with the same first names. The origins of these surnames are often tied to geographical regions, occupations, or even personal traits — think “Hill,” “Baker,” or “Armstrong.” In the United States, where the population is a diverse mix of cultures, surnames also carry with them the marks of migration, colonization, and assimilation.

Whether a last name suggests our ethnic heritage, an occupational trade, a geographical region, or the influences of colonization and religion, the identifiers we carry with us can reveal intriguing stories about our past and connect us to a broader story of human movement and settlement. With around 31 million surnames in the world, here are just a few ways that our last names tell us who we are.

Credit: Print Collector/ Hulton Archive via Getty Images 

Viking Migration Affected Naming Traditions

The Viking Age marks the period of time when seafaring Norse people raided and colonized their way through Northern Europe, from the end of the eighth century CE until the Norman Conquest in 1066. The influence of the Vikings can still be seen in the surnames of people with Scandinavian, English, Irish, and Scottish ancestry. Names ending in “-son” or “-sen,” such as Davidson or Andersen, are likely to have Viking roots in Scandinavian or Norse heritage, derived from the practice of using “son of” to identify a man’s father. For example, Andersen means “son of Anders,” a popular Scandinavian first name. Other surnames of Old Norse descent include Carlson, Ericsson, Rogerson, Gundersen, Olsen, and Iverson.

Viking migrations, raids, and settlements spread Viking naming conventions as well as the Old Norse language across regions that are now part of modern-day England, Ireland, and Scotland. Regions such as Yorkshire in northern England and parts of Ireland were significantly influenced by Viking settlers, a fact still visible in the surnames common in these areas, such as Holmes, a Viking word meaning “a small island”; McAuliff, meaning “son of Olaf”; and Higgins, which comes from an Irish word that means “Viking.” 

Similarly, Doyle, from the Irish Ó Dubhghaill, means a “descendant of Dubhghaill,” coming from the Old Gaelic dubh, meaning “dark” or “black” and ghaill, meaning “foreigner” or “stranger,” which was how the first Vikings in Ireland were described. Other Viking names with the same meaning include the Irish surname Mcdowell and the Scottish surname Mcdougall, both of which are anglicized forms of Mac Dubhghaill, meaning “son of Dubhghaill.”

Did George Washington Have a British Accent?

Author Mark DeJoy
October 24, 2024

Love it?

In 1584, the first English colony in North America was founded in what is now North Carolina. And though the 117 settlers who comprised the Roanoke Colony mysteriously disappeared three years later, ensuing waves of settlements established England’s presence on the continent for generations to come. By 1770, the total population of Great Britain’s 13 colonies in America was approximately 1.5 million. It raises the question: Since much of the population of the fledgling U.S. descended from Brits, would the American speech pattern at the time have sounded British? Could someone like George Washington, one of the most famous early Americans, have had a British accent?

Credit: Interim Archives/ Archive Photos via Getty Images

Since Washington lived in an era that predates sound recordings, we don’t have a simple answer to that question in the form of audio records of the founding father’s voice. But we can determine some possibilities by piecing together factors from Washington’s life that would have impacted the way he spoke. 

Washington was born in 1732 in Westmoreland County, Virginia, and spent most of his childhood near Fredericksburg. His father, Augustine Washington, and mother, Mary Ball Washington, were also born in Virginia. Indeed, George Washington’s lineage in the colony went back two more generations — it was his great-grandfather John Washington who set sail from England and established the family in Virginia. So America’s first president wasn’t from a family of recent British settlers; he was three generations removed, and the household he grew up in wouldn’t have necessarily spoken an accent that was common in England at the time.                                                                                                                    

Fascinating Facts About Every First Lady

Author Timothy Ott
October 24, 2024

Love it?

As highly visible but unelected members of the U.S. executive branch, America’s first ladies occupy a singular place in the firmament of public figures. Most have capably satisfied the requirements of supporting the president, hosting official affairs, and (more recently) advocating for charitable causes, but the sheer number of participants has resulted in a wild divergence of characters to play the part. 

Some first ladies were born outside the country, others enjoyed prominent careers before the White House, and a fair share weren’t actually married to the person calling the shots in the Oval Office. Some also only held the role temporarily, which is why the total number of first ladies outnumbers the 45 men who have served as commander in chief. Here are 57 facts to illuminate the lives of the 57 women who have served as first lady.

Credit: Bettmann via Getty Images

Martha Washington

George Washington never lived in the White House, but Martha Washington did; that was, coincidentally, the name of the Virginia plantation she inherited after her first husband, Daniel Parke Custis, died in 1757.

Abigail Adams

Said to be the first recorded female investor in the U.S., Abigail Adams shrewdly funneled the family finances toward government bonds and securities while her husband, John Adams, was serving his pre-presidency ambassadorships in France, the Netherlands, and Great Britain.

Martha Jefferson Randolph

Martha Jefferson Randolph served as acting first lady to her father, President Thomas Jefferson, two decades after the death of her mother, Martha Wayles Skelton Jefferson. In early 1806, Randolph gave birth to the first child born in the Executive Mansion, a boy named James Madison Randolph.

7 Foods That Are Way Older Than You Think

Author Tony Dunnell
October 24, 2024

Love it?

In our fast-paced modern world, where trendy superfoods and innovative culinary fusions are constantly emerging, it’s easy to overlook the rich history behind many of our everyday meals. But the foods we consume daily often carry with them stories that span centuries, if not millennia. These humble dishes may have witnessed the rise and fall of civilizations or the births of revolutionary technological advancements, without ever really changing their basic nature. 

Here are seven foods that are much older than we might think — foods that are not only part of culinary history, but also part of the story of human civilization itself. 

Credit: jazz3311/ Shutterstock

Noodles

Noodles, a staple in cuisines worldwide, have a history spanning thousands of years. While many people associate pasta with Italy, the oldest known noodles were actually discovered in China. In 2005, scientists uncovered this ancient food, dating back 4,000 years, at the Lajia archaeological site along the upper reaches of the Yellow River in northwest China. The thin, delicate, yellow noodles resembled the traditional lamian noodles (pulled noodles) still common in northern China today. The discovery proved that people have been enjoying noodles for millennia. Since then, of course, the food has spread across the globe, be it in the form of Italian spaghetti or Japanese ramen. 

Why Is 13 Considered an Unlucky Number?

Author Tony Dunnell
October 24, 2024

Love it?

The number 13 has long been considered unlucky in many Western cultures. Even today — in a world far less superstitious than it was in the past — a surprising amount of people have a genuine, deep-rooted fear of the number 13, known as triskaidekaphobia. For this reason, many hotels don’t list the presence of a 13th floor (Otis Elevators reports 85% of its elevator panels omit the number), and many airlines skip row 13. And the more specific yet directly connected fear of Friday the 13th, known as paraskevidekatriaphobia, results in financial losses in excess of $800 million annually in the United States as significant numbers of people avoid traveling, getting married, or even working on the unlucky day.  

But why is 13 considered such a harbinger of misfortune? What has led to this particular number being associated with bad luck? While historians and academics aren’t entirely sure of the exact origins of the superstition, there are a handful of historical, religious, and mythological matters that may have combined to create the very real fear surrounding the number 13. 

Credit: DEA / G. DAGLI ORTI/ De Agostini via Getty Images

The Code of Hammurabi

The Code of Hammurabi was one of the earliest and most comprehensive legal codes to be proclaimed and written down. It dates back to the Babylonian King Hammurabi, who reigned from 1792 to 1750 BCE. Carved onto a massive stone pillar, the code set out some 282 rules, including fines and punishments for various misdeeds, but the 13th rule was notably missing. The artifact is often cited as one of the earliest recorded instances of 13 being perceived as unlucky and therefore omitted. Some scholars argue, however, that it was simply a clerical error. Either way, it may well have contributed to the long-standing negative associations surrounding the number 13.