7 Roman Emperors Everyone Should Know

  • Bust of Augustus
Bust of Augustus
Credit: Hulton Archive via Getty Images
Author Timothy Ott

July 24, 2024

Love it?

Although Rome reached the pinnacle of its power and influence during the imperial era, which stretched from approximately 27 BCE to 476 CE, it wasn’t always easy for emperors during this period to run a tight ship. Not only did these imperial rulers endure threats from both hostile invaders and supposed allies who secretly plotted to gain power for themselves, but they also faced the myriad challenges of maintaining order among the disparate cultures of an empire that touched three continents and encompassed nearly 1.7 million square miles at its peak.

While some emperors succumbed to the pressures of the job and the temptation of corruption, others proved to have the vision and mettle to adjust as needed and propel the empire forward for the next generation. Here are seven Roman emperors who excelled in the role, helping ensure that the memory of Rome would endure for posterity.

Credit: Print Collector/ Hulton Fine Art Collection via Getty Images

Augustus (27 BCE-14 CE)

Although Julius Caesar proclaimed himself supreme leader in the dying days of the Roman Republic, it was his grandnephew and adopted son Augustus who marked a new era as Rome’s first emperor. Rich from the spoils of victory over Cleopatra’s Egypt, Augustus embarked on a building program that included necessary projects such as new roads and aqueducts, as well as awe-inspiring marvels including the Temple of Apollo Palatinus and the Theater of Marcellus. He also founded a postal system, installed a police and firefighting force, and secured the ever-expanding empire’s borders by establishing a standing army. While his boast of having transformed Rome from a city of clay to one of marble was hyperbole, it’s no exaggeration to say that Augustus’ impressive 40-year rule kick-started the two-century period of prosperity known as the Pax Romana, or “Roman Peace.”

You may also like

What the New York City Skyline Looked Like 100 Years Ago

  • New York City, mid-1920s
New York City, mid-1920s
Credit: Underwood Archives/ Archive Photos via Getty Images
Author Mark DeJoy

July 24, 2024

Love it?

Rising up from the inlet of the Hudson River, New York City has one of the world’s most recognizable and expansive skylines. It’s a built environment defined by skyscrapers, with towering historical icons such as the Empire State Building, Chrysler Building, 30 Rockefeller Plaza, and the Woolworth Building. The city — Manhattan in particular — has a legacy of cutting-edge vertical architecture dating back to the late 19th century. But 100 years ago, many of the city’s most famous buildings didn’t exist yet.

In 1924, New York City was hardly in its infancy. It had been the most populated city in the United States since 1790, and it grew to become the second most populated city in the world by 1900. As of the 1920 census, the city was home to more than 5.6 million people (compared to roughly 8.8 million today). At the time, New York’s tallest buildings were concentrated in lower Manhattan, the colonial center of the city, which by 1910 contained a bona fide vertical skyline. When downtown land became too scarce and costly, developers began building skyscrapers in midtown, which was a transportation hub thanks to Penn Station and Grand Central Terminal. But this development didn’t take place until the late 1920s. In 1924, the original Waldorf-Astoria Hotel was located at the site of the eventual Empire State Building, and the iconic twin towers of the World Trade Center were still 50 years away. Let’s travel back a hundred years for a glimpse at a very different New York City.

Credit: The New York Historical Society/ Archive Photos via Getty Images

Lower Manhattan skyline south of the Brooklyn Bridge, 1895.


The construction of tall buildings in Manhattan was spurred by two things: a finite amount of space on the narrow island, and the advent of the passenger elevator, which enabled developers to add higher floors that could be accessed without climbing stairs. Construction was completed on the city’s first two elevator-equipped office buildings in 1875, which historians consider New York’s proto-skyscrapers: the 11-story, 260-foot Tribune Building and the 10-story, 230-foot Western Union Building. The engineering capabilities of the time meant that both structures were built with load-bearing exterior walls — the walls of high buildings were designed to taper to greater thickness on the ground floor in order to provide support for the top floors. Ground-floor walls for a 150-foot building needed to be 3 feet wide; they had to be even wider for greater heights, thus reducing space on the ground floor. This created a sort of practical (and economic) cap on building height, and both the Tribune Building and Western Union Building remained New York City’s tallest occupiable buildings for many years.

Such height limitations were solved in the 1880s by a method known as skeleton construction, in which support for each floor was provided by an iron or steel frame, replacing the need for load-bearing walls. The first structure in New York City built using skeleton construction was the Tower Building in lower Manhattan. At 11 stories tall, it didn’t become NYC’s tallest building when it was completed in 1889 (it used skeleton construction to overcome a narrow lot size, not to achieve grandiosity), but it did provide the means for the city’s skyline to take shape.

You may also like

What Did an English Earl Actually Do?

  • Anglo-Saxon earls
Anglo-Saxon earls
Credit: Universal History Archive/ Universal Images Group via Getty Images
Author Kristina Wright

July 24, 2024

Love it?

Even if you’re not from the U.K., you’re likely familiar with the titles of British nobility from countless movies and TV shows. Known as the peerage system, this noble hierarchy consists of five ranks today: duke, marquess, earl, viscount, and baron. The title of earl — the oldest in the peerage system — dates back to the end of the early medieval period, during the reign of King Canute (or Cnut) in the 11th century. It is equivalent to the rank of count in other European countries and has no feminine form, so a female with this title is known as a countess. 

In the peerage system, nobles are often referred to by their titles rather than their surnames. These titles typically correspond to the names of an estate, earldom, or territory associated with the noble family. For example, Richard Neville, known as the “Kingmaker” for his pivotal role in the Wars of the Roses, was best known by his title, the Earl of Warwick.

Today, there are around 190 earls in the U.K., but while the title still carries prestige, the role is mostly ceremonial, with few formal responsibilities. Yet during the Middle Ages, earls were powerful leaders who wielded considerable influence over their territory and the kingdom at large. Here are a few of the duties that English earls were once expected to manage.

Credit: Hulton Archive via Getty Images 

Earls Governed Large Regions of the Kingdom

During the early medieval period, before the creation of the titles of duke and marquess in 1337 and 1386, respectively, earls were the highest-ranking members of the nobility, second only to the royal family. Earls were appointed by the ruling monarch and were responsible for governing large areas of the kingdom. The lands they oversaw could include several shires (counties), collectively known as a “fief” or “earldom.”  

Earls acted as royal governors, representing the king in their territories. They oversaw their estates, enforced royal laws throughout the earldom, made judgments in county courts, and collected fines and taxes for the crown from the people living on their lands. Earls were entitled to a share of the money they collected on behalf of the crown, so their lands served as a source of great wealth as well as power.

After the Norman Conquest in 1066, William the Conqueror began to make changes to the traditional system of nobility. He sought to limit the power of earls by ending their judicial control and tax-collecting responsibilities. They were also restricted to overseeing a single county and many of their former duties were taken over by the county sheriff.

You may also like

The Meaning Behind 9 Famous Middle Initials

  • Ursula K. Le Guin
Ursula K. Le Guin
via Getty Images
Author Bennett Kleinman

July 18, 2024

Love it?

Styling your name to include a middle initial is far less common now than when it first became widely popular in the 19th century. As the U.S. saw a massive population boom, many people began using their middle initial to help distinguish themselves from other people with similar names. Throughout the 19th century and into the 20th century, abbreviating your middle name was popular among everyone from presidents to activists. Today, it’s hard to imagine John Rockefeller’s name without the “D” or Susan Anthony without the “B,” but at the same time, many people aren’t sure what those letters actually stand for. Here’s the meaning behind some of history’s most famous but mysterious middle initials.

Credit: General Photographic Agency/ Hulton Archive via Getty Images

John D. Rockefeller

Business magnate John D. Rockefeller’s name has long been associated with wealth, as he’s considered by some metrics to be the richest person in U.S. history. His last name came from his father, businessman and notorious con artist William Rockefeller Sr., but his middle initial stands for Davison, the maiden name of his mother, Eliza. The Davisons were Baptists of Scotch Irish descent who lived on a farm in central New York, near where William did business. Eliza and William married in 1837 and named their first son John Davison Rockefeller. As the young Rockefeller rose to prominence, he styled his name with the middle initial “D,” as was the fashion at the time. He later named his own son John Davison Rockefeller Jr. — a tradition that continued in future generations.

You may also like

The Secret Service Code Names of 9 U.S. Presidents

  • Secret Service men
Secret Service men
ROBERTO SCHMIDT/ AFP via Getty Images
Author Bennett Kleinman

July 18, 2024

Love it?

Ever since Harry S. Truman’s presidential terms, from 1945 until 1953, presidents have been given descriptive code names used by the Secret Service to provide an added layer of anonymity when discussing the movements of the commander in chief. The process of selecting these code names is somewhat shrouded in mystery. Sometimes, the White House Communications Agency (WHCA) comes up with a list of words starting with the same letter, and the president chooses something from the list that resonates with them. Other times, the Secret Service simply assigns one of the WHCA-supplied names to the president. 

But how does the WHCA come up with the list to begin with? The agency is tight-lipped about its exact process, but a spokesperson once said the words are usually determined by “sheer whim.” While the code names often reflect something unique about the leader — whether it’s a nod to their personality, principles, or background — other times, the inspiration isn’t entirely clear.

Presidential code names started as an added security measure at a time when it was easier to intercept electronic communications. Yet despite modern advancements in technology, the tradition has endured, and these nicknames have become not-so-secret pieces of presidential lore along the way. Here are some of the U.S. presidents’ Secret Service code names, and the suspected meaning behind them. 

Credit: Historical/ Corbis Historical via Getty Images

Harry S. Truman: “General” 

Harry S. Truman was the first U.S. president with a documented Secret Service code name. “General,” though not a military title he ever held, reflects his leadership as a field artillery captain during World War II — as well as his critical, though controversial, decisiveness as president.

You may also like

All the U.S. Military Ranks, In Order

  • U.S. military symbols
U.S. military symbols
Illustration by Madison Hunt
Author Bennett Kleinman

July 18, 2024

Love it?

The U.S. military is divided into six branches: the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Coast Guard, and Space Force. Each has its own individual hierarchy, featuring the most accomplished and decorated officers at the very top and recent enlistees at the bottom. Along this chain of command you’ll find ranks such as captains, colonels, and sergeants, all of which are familiar terms. But unless you’ve served in the military, you may be wondering how those ranks stack up, and who answers to whom.

In the military, there’s no ambiguity about who your commanding officer is. There’s a firmly established chain of command so each rank knows where they stand, though the exact terminology varies among the different branches of the military. Let’s look at the ranks of the U.S. military in ascending order, from the lowest to highest positions.

Credit: Illustration by Madison Hunt

Army

The U.S. Army is the oldest of the six military branches, established on June 14, 1775. It’s also the most heavily populated branch, containing more than 460,000 active service members and many thousands more in the National Guard and Army Reserves. At the very bottom of the chain of command is the rank of private — a title generally given to new soldiers in basic training. Over time, members of the Army may rise up the ranks to the role of sergeant, which is a leadership post that commands various platoons and sections. 

Above sergeant is the rank of warrant officer. These officers are generally highly specialized technicians in areas such as intelligence or military policing. Above that is the highest grouping of ranks in the Army, the commissioned officers, who are confirmed by the U.S. Senate. The lowest commissioned officer rank is second lieutenant, and the highest is a special wartime rank called general of the Army. This role has been held by an exclusive group of people including Dwight D. Eisenhower and Douglas MacArthur during World War II. There is, however, an even more prestigious rank known as general of the Armies. This role has been conferred only three times in history: to John J. Pershing after World War I, and posthumously to both George Washington and Ulysses S. Grant.

Here are the ranks of the U.S. Army in ascending order:

  • Private
  • Private second class
  • Private first class
  • Specialist
  • Corporal
  • Sergeant
  • Staff sergeant
  • Sergeant first class
  • First sergeant
  • Master sergeant
  • Command sergeant major
  • Sergeant major
  • Sergeant major of the Army
  • Warrant officer 1
  • Chief warrant officer 2
  • Chief warrant officer 3
  • Chief warrant officer 4
  • Chief warrant officer 5
  • Second lieutenant
  • First lieutenant
  • Captain
  • Major
  • Lieutenant colonel
  • Colonel
  • Brigadier general
  • Major general
  • Lieutenant general
  • General
  • General of the Army

You may also like

Strange Workplace Etiquette of the 1960s

  • 1960s workplace
1960s workplace
Harold M. Lambert/ Archive Photos via Getty Images
Author Nicole Villeneuve

July 18, 2024

Love it?

The 1960s were a decade of profound social change in the U.S., as movements for civil rights and gender equality gained momentum across the country. While the standard American workplace was not immune to these changes, etiquette on the job still tended to reflect postwar traditionalism and formality. In offices of all kinds, people were expected to dress up and respect their superiors. Women held lower positions that didn’t pay nearly as much as men’s roles, racial diversity was sorely lacking, and behaviors that are now considered unhealthy and unprofessional could be everyday occurrences on the job. Here are some of the more surprising aspects of workplace etiquette during the 1960s.

Credit: Heritage Images/ Hulton Archive via Getty Images

Smoking at the Office

Today, the thought of people puffing away on cigarettes at their desks seems too bizarre to have ever been the norm. But in the 1960s, approximately 42% of American adults were smokers. The habit was common at just about every workplace, and it was normal to see smoke filling the air and full ashtrays not only in  business offices, but also in hospital halls, airplanes, and more. In 1964, the U.S. Surgeon General released its first report on smoking and health, definitively linking cigarette smoke with dangerous health problems. Smoking nonetheless remained ubiquitous in the workplace throughout the 1960s and for decades to follow, until most U.S. workplaces banned the practice in the 1990s and early 2000s.

You may also like

How Did Humans Survive the Ice Age? 

  • Depiction of ice age people
Depiction of ice age people
Credit: Esteban De Armas/ Alamy Stock Photo
Author Tony Dunnell

July 11, 2024

Love it?

Earth has experienced at least five significant ice ages in its history — periods in which colder global temperatures caused glaciers to expand across the planet’s surface. Homo sapiens, which emerged about 300,000 years ago in Africa, survived two such ice ages. The most recent, known as the Last Glacial Period, or simply the “last ice age,” occurred between 120,000 and 11,500 years ago. It reached peak conditions between 24,000 and 21,000 years ago, in a period known as the Last Glacial Maximum, when vast ice sheets covered North America and northern Europe. 

At that point, Homo sapiens had already spread around the world. Many of our ancestors, therefore, found themselves in a survival situation during the frigid ice age, along with animals such as brown bears, caribou, and wolves — as well as large animals known as megafauna. These impressive creatures included woolly mammoths, mastodons, and saber-toothed cats — all of which went extinct during the last ice age. 

How, then, did humans survive? It was no easy task, for sure, but our ancestors were highly adaptable. Here’s how humans not only managed to survive the last ice age, but also emerged as the most dominant species on Earth.

Credit: Wiskerke/ Alamy Stock Photo

Weatherproof Shelters

Contrary to the popular image of ice age humans — or “cavemen” — living in deep caves, our ancestors were more likely to have built sturdy rock shelters. While these shelters often made use of natural features, such as a depression in a cliff face, early humans would also have made extensive modifications to further weatherproof their shelters, such as draping large animal hides from overhangs to block out the bitter winds. With a warm fire blazing inside, these shelters provided ample protection from the cold. In the brief but slightly warmer summer months, when hunters moved out onto the open plains, they built dome-shaped huts or tents out of mammoth bones, which were then covered with animal skins. 

You may also like

5 Historical Myths That Won’t Go Away

  • Stonehenge
Stonehenge
Credit: Bettmann via Getty Images
Author Timothy Ott

July 11, 2024

Love it?

Part of the problem with examining history is the reliance on what can be scant documentation of famous figures, events, or civilizations. Whether culled from the writings of a royal scribe or an observer’s journal, these sources are often biased or misinformed, resulting in historical inaccuracies that can persist through the ages.

Thankfully, we live in an age when technology can help correct some of the fallacies,  and easy access to information can both dispel misconceptions and foster further understanding of the events of yesteryear. But while some long-held myths have more recently been dismissed — we’re looking at you, Columbus — others continue to hold sway over the populace. Here are five historical myths that stubbornly persist despite the data that debunks them.

Credit: clu/ iStock

Myth: Stonehenge Was Built by Druids

So much about Stonehenge remains a mystery, from how its collection of bluestones were seemingly transported from hundreds of miles away to exactly why this famed monument was built. As such, it would seem appropriate that the druids, themselves a mysterious sect of Celtic priests, were responsible for the formation of what may have been a religious site. However, it’s likely a myth that the druids built Stonehenge. It turns out the idea was fostered by British antiquarians John Aubrey and William Stukeley in the 17th and 18th centuries, leading to a modern-day revival of druidry and the annual gathering of its practitioners at Stonehenge for the summer solstice. While it’s unknown when the original druids first appeared, there are no records of their existence until around the first century BCE. Meanwhile, archaeological dating has shown that Stonehenge was constructed in several stages thousands of years earlier, between 3000 and 1500 BCE, making it highly unlikely that these shadowy shamans were involved.

You may also like

Did King Arthur Really Exist? 

  • King Arthur circa 530 CE
King Arthur circa 530 CE
Credit: Hulton Archive/ Hulton Royals Collection via Getty Images
Author Kristina Wright

July 11, 2024

Love it?

According to legend, King Arthur of Camelot was a heroic leader who lived in England from the late fifth century to the early sixth century. Stories of Arthur, his court at Camelot, and his Knights of the Round Table are at the heart of a collection of medieval literature known as the Matter of Britain, which portrays Arthur as a brave and loyal king who led the Britons in battle against Saxon invaders during the sixth century. Though there is a tremendous body of work about King Arthur, historians have debated for centuries whether this medieval figure ever really existed.

Credit: Epics/ Hulton Archive via Getty Images 

No Reliable Historic Record of King Arthur Exists

Despite the prevalence of Arthurian tales, particularly ones written from the 12th century on, no contemporary evidence has been found from the period in which King Arthur is said to have lived. The earliest references to Arthur first appeared in Welsh and Breton folklore and poetry, but they were not contemporary to the events they described. “Y Gododdin,” a seventh-century Welsh poem, lists one warrior’s many admirable traits before concluding, “although he was not Arthur.” Scholars suggest this reference points to a legendary warrior named Arthur who was well known in the seventh century, but that doesn’t prove that said hero was a real person.

A sixth-century historical account of Britain by a Welsh monk named Gildas is the only surviving source from Arthur’s time that references a powerful British leader who could plausibly be the hero of legend. In the account, titled De Excidio et Conquestu Britanniae (On the Ruin and Conquest of Britain), Gildas attributes the success of the Battle of Mons Badonicus, reportedly fought around 500 CE, to a British commander, but he does not name the conquering hero. The only commander Gildas references by name in his work is Ambrosius Aurelianus, a real Romano-British warrior who fought for the Saxons in the fifth century.

You may also like