6 History ‘Facts’ That Aren’t Actually True

Napoleon Bonaparte circa 1811 — Credit: Hulton Archive via Getty Images

Author Michael Nordine

March 24, 2026

Love it?209

Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it, but what about those who think they’re learning history but are actually reading myths? A number of well-known historical anecdotes are either exaggerated or completely false, making the task of discerning fact from fiction all the more difficult. From apocrypha to popular misconceptions, here are six historical “facts” that aren’t true.

Myth: People Were Burned at the Stake During the Salem Witch Trials

Though 20 different people were indeed convicted of witchcraft during the infamous Salem hearings of 1692 to 1693, none of them were burned at the stake. Nineteen of them — 14 women and five men — were hanged, five died in jail, and one man was pressed to death with stones after refusing to enter a plea. The confusion stems from the fact that those found guilty of witchcraft in Europe (where it was treated as heresy) were burned at the stake. “Burning was supposedly a way to purify the convict, and also as a threat to uncover conspiracies,” according to The Salem Witchcraft Trials: A Legal History author Peter Hoffer. Hanging them, meanwhile, was punitive.

Photo credit: Hulton Archive/ Hulton Royals Collection via Getty Images

Myth: Cleopatra Was Egyptian

Though she ruled over Egypt as its last pharaoh and was born in the ancient kingdom, Cleopatra wasn’t ethnically Egyptian. As part of the Ptolemaic dynasty, she was actually a Macedonian Greek believed to have descended from one of Alexander the Great’s generals. Her name came from the ancient Greek Kleopátra (Κλεοπάτρα), meaning “honor of the father” or “glory of her father.” She was, however, the first of her line to learn the Egyptian language and is known to have made other efforts to embrace her subjects’ customs.

Photo credit: Heritage Images/ Hulton Fine Art Collection via Getty Images

Myth: Marie Antoinette Said “Let Them Eat Cake”

It’s gone down in history as one of the most out-of-touch quotes of all time — one that emblematized the last queen of France’s disregard for her own people. There’s just one problem: Marie Antoinette never said it. The actual words in question, “qu’ils mangent de la brioche,” come from Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s autobiographical book Confessions, in which he wrote: “At length I remembered the last resort of a great princess who, when told that the peasants had no bread, replied: ‘Then let them eat brioches.’”

That passage was written in 1765, at which time Marie Antoinette was still a child and had yet to step foot in the country she helped rule from 1774 until the French monarchy was abolished in 1792, a year before her execution. After accidentally stepping on the executioner’s foot, she spoke her last words, which were considerably more polite than the quote so often attributed to her: “Pardon me, sir, I did not do it on purpose.”

Photo credit: Hulton Archive via Getty Images

Myth: Napoleon Was Short

Despite having a certain complex named after him, Napoleon Bonaparte was of average height for his time. Part of the confusion stems from the nickname “Le Petit Caporal,” which makes him sound “little” but was actually a term of endearment among his troops. There’s also the fact that inches were measured differently in 19th-century France than they are today. The former was equivalent to 2.71 centimeters, whereas the current measurement is 2.35 centimeters, which explains why he was only considered 5 feet, 2 inches tall when he died. Most estimates put him closer to 5 feet, 6 inches or 5 feet, 7 inches — not exactly a towering figure, but average or slightly above average by 18th-century standards.

Myth: The Library of Alexandria Burned Down in a Fire

Few symbols of knowledge loom as large in the collective imagination as the ancient Library of Alexandria, whose supposed burning has long been recognized as a monumental loss civilization has never fully recovered from. And while it’s true that the famed institution eventually ceased to exist, it wasn’t destroyed in a single conflagration that took much of the world’s ancient wisdom with it. What actually occurred is less dramatic but, in its own way, just as tragic: Both the collection and its influence slowly dwindled over the course of several centuries until whatever was left to burn represented a tiny fraction of the hundreds of thousands of papyrus scrolls once stored there.

No one is sure exactly what happened to the library — which was in fact part of a larger institution devoted to the Muses (goddesses who inspired all arts and knowledge in ancient Greece) known as the Mouseion — though everyone from Julius Caesar to Theophilus I of Alexandria has been blamed for its destruction. The library may be no more, but its legacy persists.

Photo credit: Hulton Archive/ Archive Photos via Getty Images

Myth: Albert Einstein Failed Math

Though it’s often cited as evidence of his humble beginnings, Einstein didn’t actually fail math. “I never failed in mathematics,” Einstein said in 1935 when presented with a Ripley's Believe It or Not! headline claiming he had. “Before I was 15 I had mastered differential and integral calculus.” The anecdote is often retold to inspire the rest of us not to let early setbacks deter us from chasing our dreams and reaching our full potential — a worthy sentiment to be sure, just not one supported by the evidence in this case.

The Most Famous Typos in History

Google search webpage — Firmbee/ Unsplash

Author Nicole Villeneuve

March 24, 2026

Love it?97

An occasional slip of the keyboard or pen can lead to errors in spelling, punctuation, or grammar, and while they may seem trivial or even funny when they happen, some typos have had significant consequences. One infamous example of a typographical error is a 17th-century printing of the Bible that caused an uproar after it changed the meaning of one of the Ten Commandments. NASA’s onetime coding error, meanwhile, has been called the most expensive typo in history.

In the grand scheme of things, typos may appear as minor nuisances, but these minuscule mistakes can spark conversations and even shape historical narratives. Read on to learn about some famous typos that remind us that even the smallest errors can have profound consequences.

Photo credit: Historic Images/ Alamy Stock Photo

The “Wicked Bible”

In 1631, a small but significant typo shook the religious world. In a reprint of the King James Bible by royal printers Robert Barker and Martin Lucas, the word “not” was egregiously left out of the Seventh Commandment, “Thou shalt not commit adultery,” which was mistakenly printed as “Thou shalt commit adultery.” The typo appeared in about 1,000 copies of the text, which later came to be known as the “Wicked Bible” or “Sinners’ Bible.” It isn’t clear how the misprint happened. Some theories over the years have suggested that a rival printer might have done it deliberately, but the more likely cause was simple oversight. When the error was discovered, the ramifications were swift and severe. The king fined the printers £300 (around $70,000 today), revoked their printing license, and proceeded to find and destroy as many copies of the Wicked Bible as possible, turning it into a rare collector’s item. Today, only about 20 copies remain in circulation.

Photo credit: NASA Archive/ Alamy Stock Photo

NASA’s Million-Dollar Typo

On July 22, 1962, NASA’s Mariner 1 spacecraft, designed for a mission to Venus, was set to launch from Cape Canaveral. But just minutes after liftoff, the shuttle had to be destroyed due to a course deviation. The culprit behind this mission-ending error was a simple coding mistake. While it’s been widely reported that a missing hyphen in the software coding was to blame, NASA has said that it was an “omission of an overbar for the symbol R for radius (R instead of R̅) in an equation,” as well as a guidance antenna on the atlas, that caused the failure. Mariner 1 was set to be America’s first interplanetary probe. It set NASA back $18.5 million (over $180 million today), an amount that led 2001: A Space Odyssey author Arthur C. Clarke to call it “the most expensive hyphen in history.” Just 36 days later, Mariner 2 successfully launched and flew by Venus, becoming humankind’s first successful scientific planetary mission.

The Lincoln Memorial Typo

The Lincoln Memorial is one of the most iconic landmarks in the United States. Before its official dedication took place in 1922, an unfortunate typo was discovered etched into the words of Lincoln’s Second Inaugural Address, one of two famous speeches inscribed on the monument, along with the Gettysburg Address. During the original carving of the inscriptions, an engraver mistakenly carved an “E” in place of the “F” in the word “FUTURE” in the phrase “WITH HIGH HOPE FOR THE FUTURE.” Eventually, the error was corrected by filling in the bottom line of the “E,” but the flub is still visible to those looking for it.

Photo credit: Buyenlarge/ Archive Photos via Getty Images

The Dictionary’s Fake Word

A dictionary is a presumed source of accuracy, but in 1934, the nonword “dord” appeared in the second edition of Webster’s New International Dictionary. It appeared between the text’s entries for “dorcopsis,” a small kangaroo species, and “doré,” meaning “golden in color.” “Dord” was listed as a noun referring to density in the fields of physics and chemistry. The intended entry was actually “D or d,” the abbreviation for density used by physicists and chemists, but the error went unnoticed before going to print. The mistake wasn’t caught until 1939, when an editor at Merriam-Webster discovered it and hastily marked up the page announcing the “imperative” and “urgent” need to correct a “ghost word” — the term given to a word that doesn’t actually exist.

Google’s Lucky Typo

In 1996, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, the co-founders of Google, named their new search engine “BackRub.” As their project grew, the tech duo began looking for a new name, and fellow Stanford student Sean Anderson reportedly suggested the name “googolplex,” the name of an incredibly large number (1 followed by a “googol” of zeroes). Page suggested the shorter “googol,” which is the mathematical expression for the number 1 followed by 100 zeros. Anderson typed the domain name to check its availability, but reportedly accidentally searched for “google.com.” The name stuck, and on September 15, 1997, Page and Brin registered the domain, a word that, while a happy accident, nonetheless succinctly reflected their mission to organize the world’s information.

Why Did Medieval People Wear Such Pointy Shoes?

Medieval poulaines — Credit: Florilegius/ Alamy Stock Photo

Author Tony Dunnell

March 24, 2026

Love it?285

If you could travel back in time to the medieval period, you’d soon see some fashion trends that are a far cry from today’s typical clothing. Depending on what century you arrived in — Europe’s medieval period lasted approximately from the fifth century to the 15th century — you might see an array of fanciful hats, from Robin Hood-style bycockets to towering cone-shaped hennin hats worn by wealthy ladies. Sleeves, too, were particularly flamboyant: Puffed-up bombast sleeves made male biceps look larger, while women of status wore long, hanging bliaut sleeves that trailed to the ground.

It was certainly an era of weird and wonderful fashion trends, and perhaps none is more peculiar to our modern eyes than the fad of wearing extravagantly pointed footwear. These pointy shoes were known as cracows or poulaines, both names referring to the origin of the footwear in Krakow, Poland, where it first emerged around 1340. The trend spread across Europe during the 14th century, and became particularly in vogue in England following the wedding of King Richard II and Anne of Bohemia in 1382, during which Anne sported a pair of poulaines.

But what was the reasoning behind this fanciful footwear? Why did pointy and highly impractical shoes become all the rage? Here, we consider the rise of cracows, and why this seemingly silly accessory became the style du jour in the late medieval period.

Credit: Florilegius/ Universal Images Group via Getty Images

Fashion is often about social display; this is true now and was perhaps even more so back in the Middle Ages. Medieval society was highly stratified, and clothing was one of the most obvious ways for a person to demonstrate their social status, whether through towering hats, billowing sleeves, or pointy shoes. When poulaines became popular, it was among the higher classes, who soon found that shoe length could correlate directly with social rank.

Only the nobility and wealthy merchants could afford to purchase such extraordinarily long shoes — and the longer and more costly they were, the more wealth and status they displayed. It was not uncommon for the points to extend 4 inches (10 centimeters) beyond the toe, with the extending area stuffed to keep it rigid. In a text from 1394, a monk from Worcestershire, England, claimed that some people wore shoes with pointed toes “half a yard [45 centimeters] in length, thus it was necessary for them to be tied to the shin with chains of silver before they could walk with them.”

It was very expensive to have such elaborate shoes made, so it was only the lords and, to a lesser extent, ladies of medieval Europe who could afford to wear them. This was especially true for the more lavish — and lengthier — varieties of pointy shoe, which were made by specialist master shoemakers for a pretty penny.

The fact that lengthy poulaines were highly impractical and hard to walk in didn’t seem to bother their fancy owners, who were willing to suffer for fashion. Researchers from Cambridge University found that cases of bunions increased significantly in the late medieval period, and placed the blame squarely with the rise in poulaine shoes.

Pointy Shoes Were Phallic Symbols, Too

Pointed shoes weren’t only an ostentatious display of wealth; they were also seen as phallic. According to the London Museum, extravagantly long shoes were favored by young men, some of whom would stand on street corners wiggling their shoes suggestively at people walking by. And if the shoes had bells sewn to the ends of them, it indicated that the wearer was available for intimate acts.

This didn’t please the Catholic Church, which saw the pointy shoes not only as symbols of vanity and excessive pride, but also as a corrupting force that could only lead to deviance and sin. Eventually, there was a crackdown on cracows. As early as 1362 — before Anne of Bohemia had even popularized the shoes in England — Pope Urban V tried to ban them completely. Later, in 1463, the English Parliament under Edward IV passed a law banning anyone lower in rank than lord from wearing shoes with points longer than 2 inches. Anyone found breaking the law could be fined, and cobblers were strictly prohibited from selling overly pointed shoes to people of insufficient status.

All of the controversy made wearing pointy shoes far less fun than it used to be, and by 1475, the poulaines trend was largely at an end. Yet for one spectacular moment in history, people did indeed wear incredibly silly pointy shoes in what was a complex display of status, wealth, misplaced manliness, and the occasional ringing of foot-based bells on street corners.

7 Presidential Myths That Won’t Go Away

Lincoln delivering Gettysburg Address — Credit: Library of Congress/ Archive Photos via Getty Images

Author Tony Dunnell

March 24, 2026

Love it?74

American presidential history is filled with colorful stories of doubtful veracity that have taken on lives of their own. Many of the most cherished and oft-repeated tales about U.S. presidents are either exaggerated, misunderstood, or completely fabricated. And these aren’t just word-of-mouth rumors — many have found their way into textbooks, tour guide scripts, and seemingly reliable websites, further perpetuating erroneous stories that in some cases have been around for centuries.

Here are seven myths about U.S. presidents that won’t seem to go away, no matter how hard historians work to correct the record.

Credit: Glen Stubbe/ Star Tribune via Getty Images

Myth: George Washington Had Wooden Teeth

Perhaps no presidential myth is more widespread and persistent than George Washington’s supposed wooden dentures. Washington did suffer from an array of dental problems throughout his life, and he often mentioned his aching teeth, inflamed gums, and ill-fitting dentures in his letters and diary entries. But wooden teeth were never part of the solution.

The truth, in fact, is arguably even more bizarre: His various sets of dentures were crafted from ivory, gold, lead, cow and horse teeth, and human teeth. The myth of the wooden dentures likely arose because the ivory dentures that Washington did use often became stained over time, taking on a woodlike appearance.

Myth: William Howard Taft Got Stuck in a White House Bathtub

The average person might not know much about William Howard Taft, but they may have heard the bathtub story. According to the popular tale, the 300-plus-pound president became wedged in a White House bathtub and required six men to extract him. It’s quite an image, but there’s no credible historical evidence that it ever happened. However, Taft was very much aware of his size and had oversized bathtubs — one of which weighed a ton — installed in the White House. These supersized tubs may have inspired the myth of Taft getting stuck in a regular-sized bathtub, a fabrication that may have been propagated by his political rivals.

Credit: Image courtesy of Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division

Myth: Abraham Lincoln Wrote the Gettysburg Address on the Train

The Gettysburg Address is widely considered one of the greatest speeches in American history. It’s also attached to a persistent myth: that Abraham Lincoln hastily scribbled the immortal address on the back of an envelope while on a train to Pennsylvania. This is entirely fictional. Lincoln actually started working on his speech not long after the Battle of Gettysburg was fought in July 1863 — a few months before he gave the address on November 19. He prepared multiple drafts, five copies of which still exist — and none displays the shaky handwriting that would have been inevitable if the speech were written on the jolting, bumpy trains of the day.

Credit: George Rinhart/ Corbis Historical via Getty Images

Myth: Theodore Roosevelt Rode a Bull Moose

In 1912, Theodore Roosevelt launched a presidential campaign as the candidate of the Progressive Party. During the campaign, Roosevelt famously declared he felt “strong as a bull moose,” after which the party was popularly referred to as the Bull Moose Party. From there, a very specific embellishment arose: that Roosevelt actually rode a bull moose during the campaign. But this never happened.

The blame for the myth lies squarely with a fake newspaper image created in 1912. Two months before the election, the New York Tribune published a set of humorous pictures under the headline “The Race for the White House.” Created by the photographic firm Underwood and Underwood, the three images showed each presidential candidate astride the animal associated with his party: William Howard Taft riding an elephant, Woodrow Wilson sitting on a donkey, and Roosevelt sitting proudly on a bull moose. A closer look at any one of the photos provides plenty of evidence of fakery — but the images were nonetheless out in the public domain, and Roosevelt’s mythical ride on a bull moose made its way into the popular consciousness.

Credit: Bettmann Archive via Getty Images

Myth: George Washington Cut Down His Father’s Cherry Tree

Apart from his mythical wooden teeth, George Washington is well known for cutting down his father’s prized cherry tree when he was a child. “I cannot tell a lie … I did cut it with my hatchet,” young George is said to have confessed, demonstrating his innate honesty. The story has been told to generations of American schoolchildren as an example of integrity and truthfulness — but it never happened.

The tale was completely invented by Mason Locke Weems, one of Washington’s first biographers, and published in The Life of Washington in 1800, shortly after the president’s death. Weems was just as interested in creating an inspiring moral fable as he was in documenting historical fact. Ironically, his cherry tree story, invented to celebrate Washington’s honesty, became one of presidential history’s most enduring lies.

Myth: William Henry Harrison Died From Pneumonia After His Long Inaugural Speech

On March 4, 1841, William Henry Harrison gave the longest inaugural address in history — an 8,460-word speech that took nearly two hours to deliver. Unfortunately for Harrison, he had to deliver the epic address in cold, wet weather without a coat, and he died of pneumonia exactly one month later. That, at least, is the story we’re often told regarding the fate of America’s ninth president. The only problem? The speech is almost certainly not what killed him.

Modern medical historians who have examined the evidence believe Harrison likely died from enteric fever, not from pneumonia as a result of cold conditions at his inauguration. The true culprit was probably Washington, D.C.’s inadequate sewer system at the time, and the White House’s close proximity to a marsh full of human waste — a breeding ground for disease.

Credit: Lehnartz/ ullstein bild via Getty Images

Myth: John F. Kennedy Accidentally Called Himself a Jelly Doughnut

American presidents say a lot of weird stuff, but it’s not every day that they solemnly declare, in front of thousands of Germans and an eagerly watching world, “I am a jelly-filled doughnut.” It’s a common myth, however, that John F. Kennedy did exactly that. In his famous 1963 speech in Berlin, JFK declared “Ich bin ein Berliner” (German for “I am a Berliner”) in solidarity with West Berlin.

But here’s where things get weird. Rumors later began to circulate in the U.S. that Kennedy had made a grammatical error resulting in him referring to himself not as a citizen of Berlin but rather as a German confection similar to a jelly doughnut, known in certain parts of the country as a Berliner. Delightful as that gaffe may be, the truth is that every German watching Kennedy’s address would have understood perfectly well what the president was referring to. The crowd knew Kennedy was expressing solidarity, not declaring himself a pastry. Of course, the myth stuck anyway — proving just how stubborn these tales can be.

Why Is a Piece of Paper 8.5 by 11 Inches?

Papermaking, 1809 — Credit: © Science & Society Picture Library—SSPL/Getty Images

Author Bess Lovejoy

March 19, 2026

Love it?172

If you’ve ever wandered the aisles of an office supply store, you may have noticed something curious: For all the different pens, folders, and desk gadgets on display, paper doesn’t offer much in the way of variety. In the United States, the go-to sheet of printer paper is 8.5 inches wide and 11 inches long, and it has been for decades. So who made that call?

The answer goes back to the 1600s, when Dutch papermakers used wooden molds to form sheets of paper from big vats of watery pulp. The molds had to be big enough for the vatman — the worker handling the frame — to lift and shake comfortably. Through trial and error, papermakers settled on molds roughly 44 inches long, the average span of a worker’s outstretched arms. When that large sheet was quartered, the resulting pieces measured about 11 inches on their long side.

The origin of the width is less certain, but historians point to the molds’ original 17-inch dimension. Halved, that produced the familiar 8.5-inch width. In other words, the size of the modern office memo may be the legacy of how far a 17th-century worker could stretch their arms.

Credit: © Sjöberg Bildbyrå—ullstein bild/Getty Images

That still doesn’t explain why this size became the American standard. For that answer, we need to skip ahead to the 20th century, when typewriters, copiers, and printers made uniformity a necessity. A sheet measuring 8.5 by 11 inches accommodated a comfortable line length — 65 to 78 characters after accounting for margins. It also minimized trimming waste when paper was cut down from larger “parent” sheets, which were often 17 x 22 inches.

For a time, the U.S. government complicated matters. In 1921, the federal government adopted 8 by 10.5 inches as the standard size for official letterhead. Around the same time, a separate industry group — part of Herbert Hoover’s effort to reduce waste — settled on 17 by 22 inches as the size of the “parent” sheet. Halved, that produced the commercial 8.5 by 11 size that everyone outside the government was already using.

The mismatch persisted for decades, with bureaucracy running on one standard and businesses on another. It finally ended in the early 1980s, when President Ronald Reagan mandated 8.5 by 11 inches for all federal forms, aligning Washington, D.C., with the rest of the country.

As for legal-size paper — standard paper’s elongated 8.5-by-14-inch sibling — that likely owes its extra 3 inches to lawyers who wanted more room for dense contracts. Today, it’s just as likely to appear in restaurants, where that bonus space comes in handy for sprawling menus.

So the real reason your printer uses 8.5-by-11-inch paper? A mix of ergonomics, industrial efficiency, and administrative tidiness — all rooted, improbably enough, in the reach of a 17th-century papermaker’s arms.

Did Victorian Women Really Faint All the Time?

Victorian woman fainting — Credit: © Universal History Archive—Universal Images Group/Getty Images

Author Nicole Villeneuve

March 19, 2026

Love it?30

It’s one of the most enduring images of the 19th century: a Victorian lady, corseted and coiffed, collapsed on a fainting couch. The idea appears repeatedly in literature and period dramas, and has become a kind of shorthand for the female condition during Queen Victoria’s reign. But did women of the era really swoon so easily and so frequently?

There are certainly many reasons to believe fainting was common; life in Victorian England wasn’t always the most sanitary or healthy, and women’s clothing was often elaborate and restrictive. But while these factors explain occasional collapses, they don’t tell the whole story.

Credit: © Sepia Times—Universal Images Group/Getty Images

A Literary Trope

In the mid-18th century, novels started to become popular in Britain, and a social tradition known as the culture of sensibility dominated the evolving medium, rooted in Enlightenment ideas about moral improvement. Literary works celebrated emotion as a sign of morality, depicting weeping and fainting — by both women and men — as signals of virtue.

The tradition continued into the 19th century. Fainting was still a common trope, but it was often framed as “swooning,” a softer, more romantic take that made it a natural fit for fiction — and usually, though not exclusively, for female characters. Writers such as Charles Dickens and Charlotte and Emily Brontë frequently used fainting not as a medical event but as a dramatic plot device that portrayed shock, fear, repression, or being overcome with emotions.

Credit: © Universal History Archive—Universal Images Group/Getty Images

Gender Norms

Novels and their later dramatic adaptations helped popularize fainting, but Victorian society made it believable. Strict gender roles were the norm, with men expected to be rational and sturdy and women gentler and more fragile. These conventions helped reinforce the ideals that valued women as morally upright and composed, yet prone to emotional delicacy.

Fainting, then, was a socially acceptable — even expected — way for women to express emotion: It was seen as just dramatic enough without being rebellious or excessive. A sudden swoon could signal just the right kind of femininity, perhaps acting as more of a social cue than a physiological event. Even mild episodes — a moment of dizziness or a need to sit down — were easily dramatized with props such as smelling salts carried around in beautiful cases, helping to punch up the cultural script.

Credit: © Media Whale Stock/stock.adobe.com

The Physical Reality

Victorian fainting, of course, wasn’t all fiction. People fainted then as they do now, and 19th-century English life was rife with conditions that could make anyone lightheaded. Poorly ventilated homes that burned coal for heat; crowded and polluted cities; arsenic-laced beauty treatments and wallpaper; and even dangerous additives in food posed additional, very tangible, hazards. Add to that the weight of layered Victorian clothing, and it’s easy to imagine moments of dizziness.

Of course, no discussion of Victorian fainting is complete without mentioning corsets. An essential part of the Victorian silhouette, corsets could indeed restrict breathing or affect blood pressure, especially if tightly laced. But historians agree that the idea of women regularly tight-lacing to the point of passing out has been largely exaggerated. Most women wore corsets for support, not spectacle; women of all classes were able to work or remain active even while wearing the everyday garment. It is probable, however, that corseting, along with these other environmental factors, did contribute to some lightheadedness and fainting during this era.

Credit: © vandervelden—iStock/Getty Images Plus

Fact or Fiction?

The image of women draped dramatically in parlors or fainting rooms — which, along with the famous fainting chairs, didn’t acquire their names until the turn of the 20th century — owes more to melodrama and modern imagination than it does to historical reality. The Victorian era had no shortage of medical issues, from infectious diseases such as cholera and typhoid to heart problems and complications during childbirth. But fainting wasn’t a persistent epidemic. Instead, it very likely became a myth that persists today as part of the broader Victorian idea of female fragility.

Why Did Doctors Stop Making House Calls?

Country doctor leaving home, 1949 — Credit: © Bettmann Archive/Getty Images

Author Kristina Wright

March 17, 2026

Love it?76

There was a time when seeing the doctor didn’t mean sitting in a crowded waiting room or logging in to a patient portal. Instead, the doctor came to you, carrying a black bag and bringing their expertise and equipment to your bedside.

Today, health care looks very different. We drive to medical campuses filled with imaging suites and labs, check in electronically, and have our patient notes transcribed by AI. The transformation has been so complete that it can be hard to imagine the house call was a central feature of American medicine little more than a century ago. So what changed?

Credit: © Debrocke/ClassicStock—Archive Photos/Getty Images

When House Calls Were the Norm

From the earliest days of American medicine through the early 20th century, house calls were a routine part of medical care in the United States. Physicians regularly traveled to patients’ homes in cities and rural areas alike. In 1930, approximately 40% of physician visits were house calls, according to the New England Journal of Medicine.

Most doctors were general practitioners who worked with patients of all ages. They delivered babies, set fractures, drained infections, treated pneumonia and influenza, and managed chronic illnesses. Medications were often dispensed directly from the physician’s bag. Payment could be made in cash or, particularly in rural areas, in goods or services.

Doctors did maintain offices, but they were often modest — sometimes located in the physician’s home — and equipped with limited diagnostic tools. Hospitals existed, but they were typically reserved for surgery, serious trauma, or advanced illness. Much everyday medical care happened in the home.

Credit: © U.S. Navy—Archive Photos/Getty Images

The Midcentury Shift

The decline of house calls was gradual at first and then dramatic. By 1950, house calls accounted for roughly 10% of physician visits; by 1980, they made up less than 1%.

Several forces drove this change. First was the rapid expansion of medical technology in the 20th century. X-rays, laboratory diagnostics, safer anesthesia, blood banking, antibiotics such as penicillin, and eventually intensive care units transformed medicine. These advances required equipment, sterile environments, and trained support staff that could not be replicated in private homes. Hospitals became safer and more effective, particularly after improvements in antiseptic technique and infection control.

Second, medicine became increasingly specialized beginning in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Rather than one physician handling nearly every complaint, patients began seeing cardiologists, obstetricians, surgeons, and other specialists who relied on centralized offices and hospital facilities. As care grew more complex, the home visit became less practical.

Credit: © H. Armstrong Roberts/ClassicStock—Archive Photos/Getty Images

Follow the Money

Alongside advances in medical technology, economics played a decisive role in the decline of house calls. Even before the mid-20th century, home visits were time-consuming. A physician might see only a handful of patients in an afternoon of travel, compared with many more in a centralized office setting. As automobile ownership expanded and suburbs spread outward after World War II, the distances between patients grew, making travel even less efficient. Office-based care allowed physicians to treat more people in less time.

World War II intensified these pressures. An estimated one-third of American physicians entered military service during the war, creating shortages in many civilian communities. With fewer doctors available, maximizing efficiency became essential. Centralized offices and hospital-based care enabled the remaining physicians to manage larger patient loads, making routine house calls even more impractical.

At the same time, the structure of payment was changing. The growth of private health insurance in the 1930s and 1940s — followed by the establishment of Medicare and Medicaid in 1965 — formalized billing systems. Office visits were easier to standardize, document, and reimburse consistently. Home visits required travel time and longer appointments, yet reimbursement did not always reflect those additional costs, making them less financially sustainable.

Meanwhile, group practices and multi-physician clinics became increasingly common in the postwar decades. Shared equipment, centralized staff, and predictable scheduling improved productivity and stabilized revenue for doctors.

Credit: © George Heyer—Hulton Archive/Getty Images

The Times They Are A-Changin’

Social change similarly played a role in the decline of house calls. As more families owned cars, traveling to a physician’s office became feasible for many folks who once relied on home visits. Urbanization, improved road systems, and expanded hospital networks also reduced geographic isolation.

Home births illustrate the broader trend. In 1900, nearly all U.S. births took place outside of hospitals, attended by either a doctor or midwife. That rate fell to 44% by 1940 and just 1% by 1969, reflecting growing confidence in hospital-based obstetric care, anesthesia, and neonatal medicine. As childbirth shifted to hospitals, one of the most common reasons for physician house calls largely disappeared.

Concerns about safety and liability also influenced practice patterns. Controlled clinical environments allowed for better infection control and standardized procedures. As medicine professionalized and regulatory standards expanded during the 20th century, office- and hospital-based care became the default model.

By the 1980s, traditional house calls had largely vanished — but they have not disappeared entirely. Geriatric and palliative care programs now provide in-home services for elderly or homebound patients. And research from the Department of Veterans Affairs and other programs has shown that home-based primary care for patients with complex chronic conditions can reduce hospitalizations and lower overall health care costs while maintaining high patient satisfaction. Telehealth has also created a new version of the house call. During the COVID-19 pandemic, virtual visits expanded dramatically after regulatory barriers were temporarily eased. While telemedicine has declined from its 2020 peak, it remains a routine part of care in many health systems.

Popular Breakfast Foods That Used To Be Dinner Foods

Chicken and waffles — Credit: © Joshua Resnick/stock.adobe.com

Author Kristina Wright

March 12, 2026

Love it?31

Why do pancakes remind us of a lazy Sunday morning ritual but seem like a strange choice at 7 p.m. on a weekday? And why do we whip up an omelet before work but rarely think to serve eggs for dinner? Many of the foods we now associate with breakfast weren’t always tied to the first meal of the day. Indeed for much of history, the idea of “breakfast foods” didn’t exist at all.

While breakfast has been around for centuries, the modern concept of it as a specialized category of food emerged primarily in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Before the Industrial Revolution, meals were shaped largely by agricultural labor cycles and household food availability, and people commonly ate similar foods throughout the day. Industrialization transformed daily life by imposing standardized work hours and commuting routines, creating demand for quick, portable, and easily digestible morning meals.

Meanwhile, the rise of packaged foods, advertising, and mass media introduced new ideas about nutrition, health, and productivity, helping define what breakfast should look like. Here are six foods that once graced the dinner table but have become associated primarily with breakfast.

Credit: © Roy Morsch—The Image Bank/Getty Images

Pancakes

In colonial America and through much of the 19th century, pancakes — also known as flapjacks, hoecakes, johnnycakes, or slapjacks — were served not just at breakfast but also for dinner (the day’s main midday meal, or what we’d call lunch today) and supper. Early American cookbooks, such as American Cookery (1796), include multiple versions of pancakes made from wheat flour or cornmeal. They might be eaten with butter, molasses, maple syrup, or alongside savory dishes and meat drippings. Rather than belonging to a specific mealtime, pancakes functioned much like bread: inexpensive, filling, and adaptable.

Their tighter identification with breakfast developed gradually in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. As printed breakfast menus became more standardized in hotels, restaurants, and eventually diners, pancakes appeared more consistently as a morning offering. Commercial baking powder made lighter cakes easier to prepare, and affordable syrup brands such as Long Cabin and Aunt Jemima (introduced in 1887 and 1888) reinforced the pairing of pancakes with sweet toppings and the morning meal. By the mid-20th century, pancakes were culturally framed almost exclusively as breakfast food, and their long history as an all-day staple was largely forgotten.

Credit: © L. Fritz—ClassicStock/Getty Images

Bacon and Eggs

For much of American history, neither bacon nor eggs belonged exclusively to breakfast. Eggs were an everyday, all-purpose food in the 18th and 19th centuries, appearing at breakfast but also at dinner and supper in omelets and other fried or baked dishes. Cookbooks such as The Virginia Housewife (1824) include savory egg dishes suited to the day’s main meal. Bacon, meanwhile, was part of the broader salt pork tradition, valued for its preservation qualities and caloric density. In colonial and 19th-century households, cured pork was commonly served with beans, greens, cabbage, or potatoes, or used to flavor stews and vegetables.

The strong association of bacon and eggs with breakfast took shape in the 1920s. Seeking to boost sales, the Beech-Nut Packing Company launched a publicity campaign promoting the foods as the ideal hearty breakfast. The effort encouraged physicians to endorse substantial protein-centered morning meals and publicized the pairing nationwide. Restaurants, hotels, and the growing American diner culture soon standardized bacon and eggs as the centerpiece of breakfast menus. By the mid-20th century, the combination had become synonymous with “the most important meal of the day” — overshadowing the long history of both foods as common components of dinner and supper.

Credit: © sbossert—iStock/Getty Images Plus

Hash

Hash began as a practical leftover dish. The word comes from the French hacher, meaning “to chop,” and by the 18th and 19th centuries, English and American cookbooks described hash as chopped cooked meat — often beef or mutton — reheated with onions, potatoes, and gravy. Before refrigeration, this was an economical way to repurpose Sunday roasts into the next day’s dinner or supper. Many early American cookbooks include hashed meat recipes as main dishes rather than breakfast fare. By the mid-19th century, inexpensive restaurants serving cheap, reheated fare were colloquially known as hash houses.

Hash migrated to the breakfast table gradually in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Its ability to be reheated quickly made it well suited to restaurant and hotel breakfast service, and by the early 1900s corned beef hash appeared regularly on printed breakfast menus. The growth of diners further cemented the association — particularly as canned corned beef became widely available in the late 19th century. By the mid-20th century, hash was primarily a breakfast or brunch dish, despite its origins as a dinner made from leftovers.

Credit: © KoriKobayashi—iStock/Getty Images Plus

Chicken and Waffles

Waffles have a long history in the United States, arriving with Dutch settlers in the 17th century and becoming especially prominent in Pennsylvania Dutch cooking. In the 18th and 19th centuries, waffles were not strictly a breakfast food — they appeared at lunch and supper as an accompaniment to roasted or stewed meat. Often served with savory accompaniments rather than syrup, they were versatile enough to soak up gravies, stews, and other rich sauces. In Pennsylvania Dutch communities, waffles topped with pulled chicken and gravy were a traditional Sunday dinner, a hearty meal rather than a morning treat.

The pairing of fried chicken and waffles developed separately and later. In 1930s Harlem, venues such as the Wells Supper Club served the dish to late-night crowds leaving clubs and theaters, offering a satisfying combination that bridged dinner and breakfast cravings. By the late 20th century, chicken and waffles shifted into a sweet and savory breakfast and brunch staple, particularly as restaurant culture expanded and diners embraced indulgent morning fare.

The Hidden Histories of Your Favorite Fonts

Typing on a typewriter — Credit: © pressmaster/stock.adobe.com

Author Tony Dunnell

March 12, 2026

Love it?13

When we create a document, send an email, or design a logo, we’re able to choose from a wide array of typefaces to find the perfect font. Most of the time, we don’t give much thought to these fonts, apart from the way they look. But these are much more than just collections of letters.

Many fonts are products of history, commissioned for particular purposes and often named in ways that reveal surprising connections to the wider world. Here are the fascinating histories behind seven of the world’s most recognizable fonts.

Times New Roman

In 1929, Stanley Morison, a noted type designer, criticized the London newspaper The Times for being typographically outdated, its narrow shapes and thin lines making it hard to read in print. Rather than push back against the criticisms, the newspaper challenged the designer to come up with something better. In collaboration with draftsman Victor Lardent, Morison spent the next year creating a new font designed specifically for the narrow columns and dense layout of the newspaper, providing improved economy of space without sacrificing readability.

The resultant font, which debuted in The Times on October 3, 1932, was named Times New Roman, because the newspaper’s previous typeface had informally been referred to as Times Old Roman. While they didn’t realize it at the time, Morison and Lardent had created what would become the world’s most famous serif typeface (lettering with small decorative strokes at the ends) — a status cemented in the 1990s when Times New Roman became the default font for Microsoft Office.

Credit: © MDoculus—iStock/Getty Images Plus

Helvetica

Today, Helvetica is one of the world’s most common fonts, ubiquitous in advertising, publishing, and urban signage. It was created in 1957 by Max Miedinger and Eduard Hoffmann at the Haas Type Foundry in Basel, Switzerland. Inspired by the vintage Akzidenz-Grotesk font (released in 1898), Helvetica was envisioned as a neutral typeface that was clear, easy to read, and could be used almost anywhere, from magazine articles to the New York City subway.

Originally, the font was named Neue Haas Grotesk — but, understandably, the type foundry decided to find a more appealing name before marketing the font internationally. The designers suggested Helvetia— the Latin name for Switzerland — which was then tweaked to Helvetica. The font became available for Linotype printing machines and later, Apple’s first Macintosh computer in 1984. From there, Helvetica’s popularity exploded, and it became arguably the most influential font of the 20th century.

Credit: © Hulton Archive —Archive Photos/Getty Images

Courier

Courier was designed by Howard “Bud” Kettler in 1955 for IBM, specifically for the company’s typewriters. It was made to be monospaced, meaning that every character occupies exactly the same width — a mechanical necessity in typewriters where each key strikes the paper at the same distance from the last.

IBM made a strategic business decision not to protect Courier with copyright or design patents, and as a result it soon became a standard font used throughout the entire typewriter industry. Even when digital typography arrived and many fonts abandoned monospacing, Courier persisted. As for the font’s name, Kettler nearly called it Messenger. He then changed his mind, explaining, “A letter can be just an ordinary messenger, or it can be the courier, which radiates dignity, prestige, and stability.”

Arial

You might not expect to find much controversy in the world of fonts, but the rise of Arial brought about a typeface hullabaloo. The seemingly innocuous font was designed in 1982 by type designers Robin Nicholas and Patricia Saunders. It was created to be metrically compatible with Helvetica, with Arial’s characters having exactly the same widths as the older, established font. This meant that documents could easily swap between Arial and Helvetica without layout changes.

The creation of this new, suspiciously similar font was also a way to avoid licensing fees for using Helvetica. The design community was swift in its criticism of Arial, calling it a poor imitation and clone of Helvetica. Nonetheless, the font quickly grew in popularity after its inclusion in Microsoft Windows in 1992, and it is now preinstalled on virtually every computer. Still, it remains a black sheep in the typographer community: In 2001, type designer Mark Simonson called Arial “little more than a shameless impostor” that only “pretends to be different.”

Photo credit: Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.

Comic Sans

Comic Sans is another font with a notorious reputation. But when type designer Vincent Connare created the font for Microsoft in 1994, he didn’t intend any harm. In fact, the typeface was originally intended for the speech bubbles of an animated cartoon dog called Rover who appeared in the short-lived Microsoft Bob software that guided users through the Windows interface.

Connare, who quite reasonably argued that dogs don't talk in Times New Roman, created Comic Sans as a friendlier, more playful alternative, with comic book-inspired letterforms in a handwritten style. Microsoft included Comic Sans in Windows 95, and soon it was everywhere: on birthday invitations, in classrooms, in business presentations, etc. It even began appearing in what the design community considered highly inappropriate contexts, including on gravestones, commemorative benches, and funeral invitations. A backlash ensued, championed by the “Ban Comic Sans” movement of 1999. Somehow, a font designed for a cartoon dog became one of the most significant — and divisive — typefaces of the digital age.

Photo credit: © 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All Rights Reserved.

Georgia

Traditional serif fonts such as Times New Roman were designed for high-resolution printing. But while their fine details looked elegant in books, magazines, and newspapers, they turned blurry or jagged on low-resolution screens. So, in 1993, Matthew Carter, one of the most renowned typographers of the 20th century, designed a serif font specifically for the digital world.

The result was Georgia. Among its chief characteristics were a larger-than-average x-height (the height of lowercase letters, excluding ascenders and descenders) and increased tracking (the space between each letter), improving clarity and readability, especially on small displays, regardless of resolution.

The font’s elegant-sounding name has a less than elegant origin story. Apparently, Carter was deciding what to call his new font when he saw a tabloid headline that read: “Alien Heads Found in Georgia.” He thought that “Georgia” sounded like a good name for an elegant typeface, and chose it for his font.

Calibri

In 2002, Dutch type designer Lucas de Groot was contacted by an intermediary who asked him to create a proposal for a monospace typeface and a sans serif font for an unnamed client. He sent his two proposals to the client, including sketches for his new Calibri design; the client, which turned out to be Microsoft, accepted both. The font was exactly what Microsoft was looking for: Its subtly rounded design was friendly; its clean, straightforward lines were easy to read; and it was perfectly suited to screens of all sizes.

Calibri was released to the public in 2007 with Windows Vista, becoming the default font on Microsoft Office and immediately going global. Etymologically, Calibri could have had a very different backstory. Microsoft requested a name that started with the letter C, to which De Groot proposed “Clas” (a Scandinavian name associated with “class”) and “Curva” or “Curvae.” But the people at Microsoft pointed out that “Clas” meant “to fart” in Greek, and “Curva” meant “prostitute” in Russian. So, in the end, they settled on the inoffensive “Calibri,” which Microsoft employees said relates to “calibrating the rasterizer in the ClearType font rendering system” — whatever that might mean.

The Weirdest Cars Ever Made

Peel P50 car, 1964 — Credit: © National Motor Museum/Heritage Images—Hulton Archive/Getty Images

Author Tony Dunnell

March 12, 2026

Love it?76

Automobile designers and engineers have often pushed boundaries to make faster, sleeker, and more attractive cars. But sometimes that effort results in vehicles so eccentric that the world looks on in bemusement.

These automotive oddities aren’t necessarily bad cars, but they certainly stand out for being well beyond the norm, whether it’s a vehicle so tiny it can fit through a doorway or a propeller-powered safety hazard. Here are seven of the most curious cars ever presented to an unsuspecting public.

Leyat Helica

In 1913, French biplane designer Marcel Leyat had what he believed was a brilliant idea: Why not put an airplane propeller on the front of a car? The result was the Leyat Helica — basically a wingless plane on wheels, with a massive wooden propeller mounted directly to the front. The first production model appeared in 1921, but despite some initial interest, only 30 were ever built.

Leyat’s car had a few issues, but one stood out: It was spectacularly unsafe. The lightweight vehicle had rear-wheel steering, minimal brakes, a top speed of 106 mph, and a giant spinning blade where most cars would have a grille. Thankfully for pedestrians, pigeons, and anything else that stood in the way of the propeller-driven death trap, the Leyat Helica never took off.

Dymaxion Car

When the visionary architect and designer Buckminster Fuller — inventor of the geodesic dome — turned his attention to cars, he created something both wonderful and strange. Fuller envisioned his land-based prototype as eventually being able to travel in the air and underwater as well, so the streamlined car looked like a cross between a VW camper, a zeppelin, and a torpedo.

Unveiled in the 1930s, the three-wheeled, 20-foot-long omnidirectional vehicle could reach speeds of 120 mph, make a 180-degree turn within its own length, and carry 12 passengers. To many people, it seemed like the future had arrived. But Fuller’s car never went into mass production, partly due to one of the prototypes being involved in a fatal crash.

Stout Scarab

The Stout Scarab is credited as the world’s first production minivan. Designed by aviation engineer William Bushnell Stout, the streamlined, beetle-shaped vehicle (hence the name “Scarab”) was notable for, among other things, its massive interior space.

Inside the 16-foot-long vehicle, only the driver’s seat was fixed — all other seats could rotate 180 degrees to face one another. There was also a removable table for business meetings or card games, a dust filter to clean the air inside, interior lighting, and power door locks — all incredibly cutting-edge for the 1930s. Perhaps it was a leap too far. Only nine Scarabs were ever built, but the car went on to influence automotive design for decades.

Credit: © Heritage Images—Hulton Archive/Getty Images

Peel P50

The Peel P50 is one of the smallest cars ever made. At just 4.5 feet long and just over 3 feet tall and wide, it’s smaller than most motorcycles and can fit through a standard doorway. And considering it weighs just 130 pounds, two people could easily carry it to the repair shop if it ever breaks down.

The original, produced between 1962 and 1965, featured a 49cc engine producing 4.2 horsepower, powering a single rear wheel to a top speed of 40 mph. The Peel P50 has no reverse gear — if you need to back up, you simply get out and pull. They are still available to buy — hand built in the U.K. and shipped worldwide — and remain both utterly impractical and absolutely wonderful.

Credit: © Gregory_DUBUS—iStock Unreleased/Getty Images

Amphicar Model 770

The Amphicar Model 770 was based on the Volkswagen Schwimmwagen, an amphibious vehicle used extensively by Nazi ground forces during World War II. That’s not the most auspicious of starts, but the Amphicar nonetheless went on to become the most successful civilian amphibious production car ever made, with 3,878 units sold between 1961 and 1968. U.S. President Lyndon B. Johnson famously owned one and enjoyed pranking guests by screaming, “The brakes have failed!” as he drove into the lake on his Texas ranch.

The problem with the Amphicar, and the reason it never sold more, was simple: It was neither a good car nor a good boat. On land, it had poor handling and minimal comfort, while on water it had a max speed of only 7 knots and very poor steering (not to mention problems with rust). Still, it was a whole lot of fun for anyone with the money to buy such an eccentric and impractical vehicle.

Credit: © Barry Winiker—Stockbyte Unreleased/Getty Images

Vanguard-Sebring CitiCar

If you’ve always aspired to drive a large wedge of cheese, then the Vanguard-Sebring CitiCar is a dream come true. Inspired by golf carts and partly a response to the 1973 oil crisis, this tiny, wedge-shaped electric vehicle was powered by a 2.5-horsepower motor and six 6-volt batteries. It could reach a top speed of 28 mph and had a range of about 40 miles.

Selling for less than $3,000, it was cheaper than most compact cars, and by 1976, the Florida-based Sebring-Vanguard was positioned as America’s sixth-largest automaker. For a while, the CitiCar was the bestselling electric vehicle in the U.S., despite looking like a doorstop on wheels.

Credit: © Maxim Kukurund/stock.adobe.com

Fiat Multipla

The Fiat Multipla is frequently mentioned as one of the ugliest cars ever produced. With its bulbous two-tiered layout and three pairs of buglike headlights, it looks like the offspring of a beluga whale and a cartoon insect. But the Multipla isn’t a bad car. It runs perfectly well, and inside its strangely wide body are two rows of three seats, making it a true multipurpose vehicle with plenty of space for luggage — all things that earned plaudits from the automotive media.

The problem, however, was its peculiar appearance. It sold 79,000 units across Europe in 1999, but sales dropped off quickly — the Fiat Multipla never even reached America, in large part because of its reputation as an eyesore. It was discontinued in 2010, but can still be seen on the road (and purchased secondhand), albeit increasingly rarely. It remains a cautionary tale of what happens when automotive design goes awry.

6 History ‘Facts’ That Aren’t Actually True

Myth: People Were Burned at the Stake During the Salem Witch Trials

Myth: Cleopatra Was Egyptian

More from our network

How Well Do You Know Your U.S. Geography?

Go Retro With This 1960s Fashion Quiz

6 Tricks Grocery Stores Use To Influence What You Buy

5 Tips to Unplug on Your Vacation

Do You Know What the “P” in “P.M.” Stands For?

Myth: Marie Antoinette Said “Let Them Eat Cake”

Myth: Napoleon Was Short

Myth: The Library of Alexandria Burned Down in a Fire

Myth: Albert Einstein Failed Math

The Most Famous Typos in History

The “Wicked Bible”

NASA’s Million-Dollar Typo

More from our network

How Well Do You Know Your U.S. Geography?

Go Retro With This 1960s Fashion Quiz

6 Tricks Grocery Stores Use To Influence What You Buy

5 Tips to Unplug on Your Vacation

Do You Know What the “P” in “P.M.” Stands For?

The Lincoln Memorial Typo

The Dictionary’s Fake Word

Google’s Lucky Typo

Why Did Medieval People Wear Such Pointy Shoes?

The Social Hierarchy of Pointy Shoes

More from our network

How Well Do You Know Your U.S. Geography?

Go Retro With This 1960s Fashion Quiz

6 Tricks Grocery Stores Use To Influence What You Buy

5 Tips to Unplug on Your Vacation

Do You Know What the “P” in “P.M.” Stands For?

Pointy Shoes Were Phallic Symbols, Too

7 Presidential Myths That Won’t Go Away

Myth: George Washington Had Wooden Teeth

More from our network

How Well Do You Know Your U.S. Geography?

Go Retro With This 1960s Fashion Quiz

6 Tricks Grocery Stores Use To Influence What You Buy

5 Tips to Unplug on Your Vacation

Do You Know What the “P” in “P.M.” Stands For?

Myth: William Howard Taft Got Stuck in a White House Bathtub

Myth: Abraham Lincoln Wrote the Gettysburg Address on the Train

Myth: Theodore Roosevelt Rode a Bull Moose

Myth: George Washington Cut Down His Father’s Cherry Tree

Myth: William Henry Harrison Died From Pneumonia After His Long Inaugural Speech

Myth: John F. Kennedy Accidentally Called Himself a Jelly Doughnut

Why Is a Piece of Paper 8.5 by 11 Inches?

More from our network

How Well Do You Know Your U.S. Geography?

Go Retro With This 1960s Fashion Quiz

6 Tricks Grocery Stores Use To Influence What You Buy

5 Tips to Unplug on Your Vacation

Do You Know What the “P” in “P.M.” Stands For?

Did Victorian Women Really Faint All the Time?

A Literary Trope

More from our network

How Well Do You Know Your U.S. Geography?

Go Retro With This 1960s Fashion Quiz

6 Tricks Grocery Stores Use To Influence What You Buy

5 Tips to Unplug on Your Vacation

Do You Know What the “P” in “P.M.” Stands For?

Gender Norms

The Physical Reality

Fact or Fiction?

Why Did Doctors Stop Making House Calls?

When House Calls Were the Norm

More from our network

How Well Do You Know Your U.S. Geography?

Go Retro With This 1960s Fashion Quiz

6 Tricks Grocery Stores Use To Influence What You Buy

5 Tips to Unplug on Your Vacation

Do You Know What the “P” in “P.M.” Stands For?

The Midcentury Shift

Follow the Money

The Times They Are A-Changin’

Popular Breakfast Foods That Used To Be Dinner Foods

Pancakes

More from our network