5 Famous Figures Who Nearly Made the Olympics

Author Tony Dunnell
February 12, 2026

Love it?

In 67 CE, the Roman Emperor Nero decided to take part in the Olympic Games. He competed in a number of events, including chariot racing, singing, poetry, and lyre playing. Needless to say, the eccentric emperor made sure he was declared the winner in each discipline — including the chariot race, despite him falling out of his chariot and never finishing the event. 

Other famous figures have made far more dignified appearances in the modern Olympics. George S. Patton, one of the United States’ most famous military generals, competed in the modern pentathlon at the 1912 Games in Stockholm, finishing in fifth place. Johnny Weissmuller was a superstar in the pool, winning five gold medals, before he became famous on the silver screen as Tarzan. Other notable celebrity Olympians include bestselling author Benjamin Spock (gold medal in rowing), Jessica Springsteen (Bruce’s daughter, equestrian), and Caitlyn Jenner, who won gold and broke the world decathlon record at the 1976 Montreal Games.

Of course, for every athlete who makes it to the Games, countless others fall short of their dreams, including some celebrities who went on to achieve success in entirely different fields. Here are five famous figures you may be surprised to learn nearly made the Olympics. 

Credit: Rick Maiman/ Sygma via Getty Images 

Geena Davis

Academy Award-winning actress Geena Davis took up archery at age 41 after becoming fascinated by the sport while watching the 1996 Atlanta Games. She’d already established herself as an A-list actress by that point, having portrayed Thelma Dickinson in Thelma & Louise (1991) and the baseball-playing Dottie Hinson in A League of Their Own (1992), but archery was calling. 

In 1997, she found a coach and dedicated herself completely to the sport for two years. She won local and national tournaments and soon found herself competing against 300 other women vying for a place on the U.S. Olympic archery team for the 2000 Sydney Games. She finished in 24th place — a highly respectable achievement, but not quite enough to make it to the Olympics. 

The Strangest Military Fashion Through History

Author megneal
February 12, 2026

Love it?

Military uniforms are nearly as old as organized warfare itself. Armies in ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia wore coordinated dress and equipment as early as 3000 BCE. This included helmets, shields, and distinctive garments that helped identify soldiers while signaling rank, loyalty, and authority. Although these early outfits were not uniforms in the modern sense, they served the same two goals that most military dress has always balanced: practicality on the battlefield and symbolic display.

Long before camouflage and synthetic fabrics, military clothing often prioritized visibility and impact over concealment or comfort. Bright colors cut through the smoke of black-powder battles, towering hats and exaggerated silhouettes made troops appear larger and more intimidating, and ornate details reinforced discipline, tradition, and national pride. Here are some of history’s strangest military fashions, from elaborate uniforms that prized showmanship over function to practical gear that defied convention.

Credit: Duane Howell/ The Denver Post via Getty Images 

Mountain Division Ski Uniforms 

The U.S. Army’s 10th Mountain Division was created during World War II for mountain and winter warfare, with troops trained in skiing, climbing, and high-altitude survival at Camp Hale, Colorado. Its soldiers wore specialized cold-weather and ski gear that looked very different from standard Army uniforms. The attire included wool shirts and trousers, layered ski parkas reversible for snow camouflage, white over-trousers, ski boots, goggles for glare protection, and white wooden skis.

The distinctive white camouflage and layered clothing reflected function over form, prioritizing warmth, flexibility, and survival in extreme conditions. Despite looking unconventional, the uniform proved highly effective during combat in the harsh Italian Apennines.

What Did History’s Most Important Moments Smell Like?

Author Kristina Wright
February 11, 2026

Love it?

Think about the historical moments you’ve learned about over the course of your life — scenes shaped by textbook descriptions, famous photographs, paintings, or old newsreels. Some historical events left tangible evidence behind: documents, tools, clothing, buildings, and personal objects that help anchor those happenings in the real world. By the late 19th and early 20th centuries, many of history’s turning points were even documented with sound, preserved on scratchy recordings or early film.

But there’s one sense that we rarely consider when talking about the past: what history smelled like. It’s not something most of us have considered because it’s not usually possible to bottle or archive an odor from the past. Still, the historical moments that we know so much else about had distinct smells shaped by their environment. When we pause to imagine the smell of pivotal events, history becomes less distant and more immediate. Here’s what some of the most important moments in history likely smelled like.

Credit: Picture Post/ Hulton Archive via Getty Images

The First Olympic Games (776 BCE) 

The first recorded Olympic Games, held at Olympia, Greece, in 776 BCE, unfolded in air thick with oil, dust, and body odor. Athletes often competed nude with their bodies massaged and coated in olive oil that smelled fresh, grassy, and faintly bitter, clinging to skin warmed by the sun. Mixed with this was the sharp, salty odor of sweat from unwashed bodies, intensified by days of exertion, heat, and close proximity in training and competition areas, where physical contact further concentrated these smells.

Underfoot, dry earth and trampled grass released dusty, mineral scents as crowds moved through the grounds. Animal dung from pack animals, human waste in nearby latrines, and food scraps added to the odors. Herbal garlands of laurel, thyme, and wildflowers contributed pleasant aromas, while animal sacrifices to Zeus created a heavy odor of greasy smoke and charred meat that lingered throughout the area. It was a smell of dedication and competition, marking the Olympics as both a religious festival and a test of physical excellence.

8 of the Most Expensive Foods in History

Author Bess Lovejoy
February 11, 2026

Love it?

Throughout history, certain foods have carried astronomical price tags. Some were costly because they were difficult to grow or find, others because they traveled great distances along early trade routes, and still others because myth elevated them into coveted status symbols. 

From spices that once cost more than gold to tropical fruits displayed as signs of prestige, luxury foods reveal what different eras valued — and what they were willing to pay for. This list explores some of the most expensive and unexpected delicacies in history, tracing how scarcity, symbolism, and shifting tastes turned everyday ingredients into the edible treasures of their time.

Credit: orinocoArt/ Adobe Stock 

Saffron 

Sometimes called “red gold,” saffron has been prized for millennia, appearing in written records as early as 2300 BCE. In the 14th and 15th centuries, it was often worth more than gold by weight, and it’s currently the most expensive spice pound for pound (costing between $2,000 to $10,000 per pound). Its extraordinary cost comes from the staggering labor required to harvest it. Each Crocus sativus blossom yields just three fragile stigmas (the part of the flower that catches pollen), which must be handpicked during a brief fall bloom, ideally midmorning when the flowers fully open. Modern estimates suggest that producing 1 kilogram (2.2 pounds) of dried saffron requires 70,000 to 200,000 flowers and 370 to 470 hours of labor, which helps explain why the spice has historically fetched astonishing sums.

Saffron’s value also surged thanks to its many uses: Historically, it was a culinary cornerstone across Asia and the Mediterranean, a sacred dye in Hindu traditions, and a prized medicinal ingredient in ancient Rome (where Pliny the Elder claimed it was nearly a universal cure). Demand especially soared in medieval Europe; Venice dominated the saffron trade, and adulteration was taken so seriously that a merchant was once burned at the stake for trying to sell a phony product. 

The Origin of 7 Surprising Nicknames

Author Bess Lovejoy
February 5, 2026

Love it?

Some of the most familiar nicknames in the English language seem to have little in common with the names they’re supposedly short for. How did Chuck become short for Charles, for instance? And why do some Margarets go by Peggy? Many of these curious nicknames carry centuries of linguistic history. Some emerged from playful medieval rhymes, others from sound shifts in everyday speech, and still others from migration, mishearing, or sheer convenience.

The word “nickname” itself also has a somewhat surprising origin, making it a perfect example of how these terms evolve. It comes from the Middle English ekename, meaning “also-name” or “additional name,” built on the Old English word eaca, meaning “an increase.” An ekename was literally an extra name added to the one a person already had. By about the 15th century, saying “an ekename” aloud became “a neke name,” which eventually led to its familiar form: “nickname.” 

The word “nickname” has nothing to do with the name Nicholas or the word “nick” — it’s a linguistic accident that stuck, like many nicknames themselves.

Credit: 14031857/ iStock via Getty Images Plus 

Peggy for Margaret

At first glance, Peggy seems like a bizarre detour from Margaret — a name that already comes with a slate of more intuitive nicknames, from Meg to Maggie to Margo. But Peggy follows a classic medieval pattern: rhyming nicknames.

In Middle English, Margaret was commonly shortened to Meg or Mog. From there, medieval English speakers — famous for inventing playful, rhymed pet names that switched up the first letters of a name — spun off new versions. Playing with “m” and “r” names was especially common. Meg became Peg, and Meggy became Peggy. 

Peggy isn’t the only unexpected nickname Margaret picked up. Educated English speakers in the early modern era also used Daisy, inspired by the French name Marguerite, which means “daisy.” And in an era when families routinely reused the same handful of given names, these nickname detours made practical sense; they were useful for telling one Margaret from another. Luckily for all the Peggys, theirs was a far more charming nickname than one of the era’s less-fortunate options: Some Margarets were called Maggot.

8 U.S. Presidents Who Struggled in School

Author Timothy Ott
February 5, 2026

Love it?

Given the importance of the position of president of the United States, you might expect those who have held the role to wield academic credentials that distinguish them from the general public. Some presidents, including Thomas Jefferson, John Quincy Adams, and Woodrow Wilson, to name a few, certainly demonstrated their advanced brainpower as students. Even many of those who came of age in the rough-and-tumble frontier years of the 19th century showed a capacity for learning in spite of limited opportunities, with Abraham Lincoln standing as the most famous example of a largely self-taught commander-in-chief.

Yet, there are also a fair share of presidents who either treated their school days as a necessary nuisance to slog through or required some extra assistance to avoid failing grades and expulsion. Here are eight U.S. presidents who encountered more adversity than they wanted in the halls of academia.

Credit: Universal History Archive/ Universal Images Group via Getty Images 

Zachary Taylor

Reared by a prominent landowning family outside Louisville, Kentucky, Zachary Taylor attended at least two local schools as a child. However, one has to question just how much the 12th president learned in these classrooms, as his earliest surviving writing (from when he was a young man) reveals severe deficiencies in spelling, grammar, and penmanship. 

Part of this may be attributable to the quality of schooling available on the Kentucky frontier, but it’s also likely this son of a Revolutionary War officer found his attention drawn to what he considered more exciting possibilities. Sure enough, Taylor struck out on what became a lengthy military career in 1808, although he was said to have developed a greater appreciation for education as he aged.

The Surprising History of Tarot Cards

Author Bess Lovejoy
February 5, 2026

Love it?

For centuries, tarot cards have carried an aura of mystery. To many people, they are tools for reflection, storytelling, or spiritual insight, while to others, they are simply beautiful objects, or perhaps sources of fear and disdain. But few people are aware that tarot’s earliest history has nothing to do with divination. Long before the cards were used to peer into inner lives or imagined futures, they were created for a very different purpose: play.

Credit: DEA / G. CIGOLINI/ De Agostini via Getty Images 

A Renaissance Card Game

Tarot emerged in northern Italy in the early 15th century, at the height of the Renaissance, when card games were a fashionable diversion among aristocratic courts. Wealthy families commissioned ornate decks known as carte da trionfi, or “cards of triumph,” to play a game called tarocchi. Though the rules have not survived intact, the game appears to have combined skill, memory, and chance, and may have been a bit like bridge.

The most likely patron of the first tarot deck was Filippo Maria Visconti (1392-1447), the reclusive Duke of Milan, whose court delighted in symbolic display and intellectual play. Roughly 15 decks associated with the Visconti family survive today, most famously the Visconti-Sforza deck, dating from the mid-1400s. These cards were luxury objects, lavishly decorated with gold leaf and fine detail, designed to impress as much as to entertain.

Why Do Men’s and Women’s Shoes Have Different Sizes?

Author Tony Dunnell
January 29, 2026

Love it?

If you’ve ever tried on a pair of shoes in your size that didn’t even come close to fitting, it could be because they were labeled for the opposite sex. Men’s and women’s shoes have completely different sizing systems in the United States (unlike most of the world, where sizing is unisex). A women’s size 8 foot, for example, is roughly equivalent to a men’s 6.5 in U.S. sizing. This seemingly arbitrary system leaves many shoe-hunters scratching their heads. Why do we have different numbers for men’s and women’s shoes? Why not just use the same sizes for everyone, regardless of gender? 

Credit: H. Armstrong Roberts/ClassicStock/ Archive Photos via Getty Images 

The First Shoe Sizes

Though the first known description of a shoe-sizing system appears as early as 1688 in England, it wasn’t until the 19th and early 20th centuries that concerted efforts at shoe standardization took place. Manufacturing was becoming increasingly industrialized, and shoemakers were transitioning from custom-made footwear to mass production — which required standardized sizing systems. 

In the United States, the first detailed sizing system was introduced by New York businessman Edwin Simpson in the 1880s. He based his sizes on the existing barleycorn system in the U.K.: The British standard for an inch was historically measured as three barleycorns laid end to end, and had long been used to measure bespoke shoes. 

Each full U.S. shoe size increases by one-third of an inch (a barleycorn), so to turn a foot measurement into a size number, you multiply the foot length by three (to count how many of those one-third-inch measurements fit) and then subtract a fixed amount: 22 for men’s shoes and 21 for women’s shoes. For example, a man who wears a size 9 typically has a foot about 10 and one-third inches long, because 9 plus 22 is 31 (the barleycorn measurement), and 31 divided by 3 is 10.333 inches.

This subtraction keeps the size numbers small and convenient instead of having much larger sizes such as 30 or 40. The slight difference in how much is subtracted for men’s versus women’s sizes accounts for historical differences in how the sizes were set up. The details of who determined these subtraction amounts has been lost to history, but the resulting sizes are still used to this day.

Simpson’s measuring system was adopted by the Retail Boot & Shoe Dealers’ National Association about a decade later, providing the first nationwide shoe-sizing guidelines. By the 1920s, standardized measuring devices such as the RITZ Stick and the Brannock Device were adopted by stores across the country, further cementing standardized shoe sizes. 

6 Jobs That Paid More in the Past

Author Kristina Wright
January 27, 2026

Love it?

Today, the future is full of big promises, and careers in fields such as artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, and climate science are expected to produce the next generation of top earners. But history reminds us that many of the jobs that once paid really well no longer deliver the same economic security. Over the years, technology, deregulation, and shifting markets have steadily eroded pay and bargaining power. These six occupations are reminders that even the most lucrative careers can shift with the changing times.

Credit: Bettmann Archive via Getty Images 

Stockbroker

In the 1950s through the early 1980s, stockbrokers occupied an elite position in the American labor market. Trading commissions were fixed, information was scarce, and brokers acted as essential gatekeepers to financial markets. While precise figures are difficult to pin down because compensation was heavily commission-based and not consistently captured in government wage data, average salaries in 1969 ranged between $13,000 and $20,000, or $118,000 to $182,000 when adjusted for inflation. Top performers could earn much more, and regulations effectively guaranteed commissions.

Deregulation on May 1, 1975, known as “May Day,” eliminated fixed commissions and fundamentally changed the industry. Discount brokerages, online trading platforms, and algorithmic trading stripped individual brokers of their pricing power. But even with the new rules, many brokers continued to command impressive salaries into the 1980s, with an average salary of $79,000 in 1985 — or $242,000 in today’s dollars. Currently, the median salary for a securities, commodities, and financial services salesperson sits around $78,000 annually. Some brokers still earn commissions or performance-based bonuses on top of their base pay, but commissions are typically smaller and less central to earnings than they once were. While a small minority still earn very high incomes, the average stockbroker now makes a fraction of what the role once commanded.

5 Unbreakable Olympic Records

Author Tony Dunnell
January 27, 2026

Love it?

Every four years, the world watches as elite athletes push themselves to ever greater heights in search of Olympic gold — and, perhaps, even a new Olympic record. Some records, however, stand so far above the rest that they seem destined to endure forever. An “unbreakable” record, of course, is a little hard to prove, but some feats — such as the five below — are so exceptional that it seems unlikely they will be bested anytime soon.

Credit: Smiley N. Pool/ Houston Chronicle via Getty Images

Usain Bolt’s 100 Meters

During the 2012 London Games, Jamaican sprinter Usain Bolt set a new Olympic record time of 9.63 seconds in the 100-meter dash. The record has yet to be beaten at the Olympics and would have represented the absolute pinnacle of human speed if it weren’t for Bolt’s world record of 9.58 seconds, set at the 2009 IAAF World Championships in Berlin. (Bolt reached an astonishing 27.8 mph when he hit full stride.) 

Bolt is a towering figure, quite literally, among his rivals. The fastest sprinters tend to be comparatively short and compact in comparison to Bolt’s frame of 6 feet, 5 inches, which allowed him to complete a 100-meter race in around 41 steps — three to four steps fewer than his competitors. His perfect technique, peak competition form, and biomechanical uniqueness may never be seen again, making it unlikely that his record will be beaten in the foreseeable future.